• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Darrell Issa: Emails suggest Elijah Cummings prompted IRS targeting[W:130, 252, 358 ]

Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Because it is a fishing expedition and a witch hunt and the Constitution protects us from such shenanigans by unscrupulous partisan politicians.

a withhunt is what the the media did to Palin flying to Alaska and turning over every rock on her and her family.. trying to even go after her tiny church..

thats a witchhunt
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Because it is a fishing expedition and a witch hunt and the Constitution protects us from such shenanigans by unscrupulous partisan politicians.

You have no idea of what your'e talking about.


Your best defense, the Liberals BEST defense is to use hyperbole and lies to try and reclassify House Oversight as a "witch hunt".

You dont even know what a Witch hunt means.

Its persecution, done outside the legal processes.

So now you know and can move onto the next desperate ans pathetic attempt to justify this highly illegal behaviour by the Democrats.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

False. Many stayed in limbo through the 2012 election cycle. If they were approved after November 2012 then they were effectively blocked from participating in the election process.



Ah, you don't agree with the law so why NOT apply the law unevenly against your political enemies, eh?

How exactly were they prevented from doing anything? First, 501c4's are allowed to operate as 501c4's without gaining approval. Second, 501c3's and 501c4's aren't allowed to participate in the election process.

I think this is about the 15th time I've "reminded" you about this. Any chance you can update your talking points a bit?
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

The letter to Holder, Levin said, is part of the Republican Party's "year-long effort" to try to show that the White House was involved in the IRS scandal or that only conservative groups were targeted. "All of those claims were false," Levin said.

Some liberal groups were also inappropriately targeted by the IRS, but that didn't stop the GOP over the past year from seizing this issue as a conservative cause.

House panel asks feds to consider criminal charges against Lois Lerner - CBS News

.. youre wrong... funny CBS seems to still be run by Mapes and Rather.. they still dont report accurate news.. only make up the news they want

Committee report: No progressive groups were targeted by IRS | The Daily Caller
 
Last edited:
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

We have made how many posts? hundreds, still zero evidence there was any wrong doing, or if there was it was connceted to the white house...Why do we fall for this?
How exactly were they prevented from doing anything? First, 501c4's are allowed to operate as 501c4's without gaining approval. Second, 501c3's and 501c4's aren't allowed to participate in the election process.

I think this is about the 15th time I've "reminded" you about this. Any chance you can update your talking points a bit?
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Rep. Sandy Levin, D-Mich is who I quoted. But she probably doesnt know, cause she dont read enough RW web sites. Impossible for her to know the truth.

all I know is youre not bringing any truth to this debate..
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Rep. Sandy Levin, D-Mich is who I quoted. But she probably doesnt know, cause she dont read enough RW web sites. Impossible for her to know the truth.

who cares about some dim dem shill Sandy Levin? you and her are both wrong.... its comical what you post thiniking its truth
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

So you are just oblivious or you are playing dumb. Not a great debate technique.

I am only concerned with changing the law and so would you if you cared about fairness. All groups that got that exemption were violating tax law as far as I am concerned.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

We have made how many posts? hundreds, still zero evidence there was any wrong doing, or if there was it was connceted to the white house...Why do we fall for this?

enjoy the crow.. use salt..
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

I am only concerned with changing the law and so would you if you cared about fairness.

Oh Im sure thats all you care about....
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Taste like fish, a fish with big eyes and a confused look on his face. I will go with the word of Levin, Issa is nuts.
enjoy the crow.. use salt..
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

We have made how many posts? hundreds, still zero evidence there was any wrong doing, or if there was it was connceted to the white house...Why do we fall for this?

We like hearing ourselves talk? or write?

I think of it more as balancing the scales a bit. If someone came into this discussion knowing nothing, I'd hope they'd see more than the intentionally false right wing talking points.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

How exactly were they prevented from doing anything? First, 501c4's are allowed to operate as 501c4's without gaining approval.

No they aren't. Not without losing their tax exempt status.

Second, 501c3's and 501c4's aren't allowed to participate in the election process.

They are allowed to spend money on advocating political positions.

But do I take it that you think Citizens United SCOTUS decision was no big deal? It's one of the problems that the Dems face in this debate, on the one the scream that CU decision was the end of free elections, and on the other they want to argue that denying 501(c)(4) participation is no big deal. They can't have it both ways.

I think this is about the 15th time I've "reminded" you about this. Any chance you can update your talking points a bit?

Nope. You haven't actually made a point worth considering yet, and if you made that point to me in the past I can see why it was forgettable.
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Even The Daily Caller says there seven Progressive groups targeted.


IRS agents testified before Congress that the agency’s political targeting did not apply to progressive groups as Democrats and the media have claimed, according to a bombshell new staff report prepared by the House Oversight Committee chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa.

IRS agents testified before Oversight that ACORN groups were scrutinized because the agency thought they were old organizations applying as new ones. Emerge America was scrutinized for potential “improper private benefit.” No evidence exists that the IRS requested additional information from any Occupy Wall Street group.

“Only seven applications in the IRS backlog contained the word ‘progressive,’ all of which were then approved by the IRS, while Tea Party groups received unprecedented review and experienced years-long delays. While some liberal-oriented groups were singled out for scrutiny, evidence shows it was due to non-political reasons,” according to the Oversight staff report



Read more: Committee report: No progressive groups were targeted by IRS | The Daily Caller



wrong.. not one did they reuqest any info on...
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

I am only concerned with changing the law and so would you if you cared about fairness. All groups that got that exemption were violating tax law as far as I am concerned.

So in your warped world you justify the biased application of the law because those who were stonewalled shouldn't be allowed anyway? Do you have any idea how dangerous your thinking is?
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Even The Daily Caller says there seven Progressive groups targeted.

try to read it without Obama blinders on next time..
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Funny, if this were truly a "witch hunt" it would have been over long ago.

Who counters a "witch hunt" with 24 consecutive 5th ammendment pleas ?

Lol..
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

Taste like fish, a fish with big eyes and a confused look on his face. I will go with the word of Levin, Issa is nuts.

well thats makes sense since facts and you cant coexist..
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

CBS and CNN, who I trust a little more than Tucker Carlson when it comes to journalism.

But, it doesn't matter. I have a hunch that you're going to say that anything which runs contrary to your view as "liberal lies".

dont care who you trust.. I bet you thought the fake docs Rather created to harm GWB were "real"...CBS.. laughable stuff..
 
Re: Issa uncovers the smoking gun int he IRS targeting of conservatives

CBS and CNN, who I trust a little more than Tucker Carlson when it comes to journalism.

But, it doesn't matter. I have a hunch that you're going to say that anything which runs contrary to your view as "liberal lies".

Liberals ARE LIARS.
That much CAN be proven over and over and over again.

From Obamas pathological promises to Al Sharpton's lies about when and how he became a FBI informant, the left relies on spouting misinformation because they know their followers are low information ideologues.
 
Back
Top Bottom