• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Economy adds 192,000 jobs; unemployment rate holds steady at 6.7%

monthly jobs report. rage or rejoice.

It's funny how our "honest" government never reports how many jobs were lost or how many people left the workforce entirely because either a) they couldn't find work or b) because their unemployment benefits expired. In both cases those individuals aren't even factored into unemployment numbers.

Also, we always here how many jobs were gained but we're never told how many jobs were lost. For all we know there was a net loss in jobs - and without question if we had a republican president the media would figure that out really quick and point out the net losses.

This administration is the most deceptive I have ever witnessed.

These assclowns redesigned the unemployment formula in such a way that it makes unemployment drop regardless if data contradicts the "official" unemployment numbers.

In short - the government is downright lying to the American people, and they're doing so just to make it appear that what they're doing is actually working when in reality what they have done has made everything worse.
 
Last edited:
Ah! Back to the pamphlet slogan's eh? Is it because you don't want to define what it is your talking about, and you don't like specifics being asked that you have to take such a puerile approach?

Speak like an adult, and answer the direct question....What do you mean by "habit"?

Still only non sequiturs for your Cause, even after all the posts in this very thread?

Why not solve simple poverty in our republic and stop playing shell games with statism regarding unemployment metrics.

Why not get a clue and a Cause, and then debate the issues?
 
Still only non sequiturs for your Cause, even after all the posts in this very thread?

Why not solve simple poverty in our republic and stop playing shell games with statism regarding unemployment metrics.

Why not get a clue and a Cause, and then debate the issues?

I have news for you - you or your progressive ilk will NEVER solve poverty.

The progressive solution to poverty is to make everyone poor because they cant make everyone rich - of course this all stems from the idea that progressives are obsessed with "equality" - which is why presently progressives are obsessed with stealing from one and giving to another.

Do you not understand that stealing is wrong and living off the taxpayers is wrong???

Now, I realize that sometimes people fall on tough times, however we have a populace out there that have made it a policy to live for free off the taxpayers and given progressives and their actions they don't have any problem with that at all - as a matter of fact some progressives call that "justice."

Furthermore the progressive elitists in government have no desire to solve poverty - you know why? because these elitist clowns need someone to pander to (the poor) and they need to pay them off for their progressive vote.

If these people didn't need or want the free money the progressives love to hand out like candy then they wouldn't need the democratic party, which in turn would eradicate the democratic party entirely...

Also, the notion these progressive elitists are trying to help people is laughable -- these assholes aren't trying to help you, they're doing what they do for self preservation. These elitist progressives in government would cull you if you got in their way and if they could get away with it.
 
Ah! Back to the pamphlet slogan's eh? Is it because you don't want to define what it is your talking about, and you don't like specifics being asked that you have to take such a puerile approach?

Speak like an adult, and answer the direct question....What do you mean by "habit"?



Heya JMAC.....wonder what country in Human history ever got rid of poverty? Do you think they can name one? Just one throughout mankind's history on this planet?

Oh and on that Jobs issue.


Why 100,000 jobs a month won't lower unemployment rate.....

How's that? Well, if the whole economy, including government, ticked along at a pace of 100,000 job gains per month, it wouldn't be fast enough to account for natural demographic growth in the labor force. A rising population means about that many new people should be entering the workforce each month.

So a modest pace of 100,000 jobs a month is certainly better than declines, but it doesn't begin to fill America's jobs hole. .....snip~

Why 100,000 jobs a month won't lower unemployment rate - CSMonitor.com

http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-pa...a-and-democrats-believe-8.html#post1063237175
 
I have news for you - you or your progressive ilk will NEVER solve poverty.

The progressive solution to poverty is to make everyone poor because they cant make everyone rich - of course this all stems from the idea that progressives are obsessed with "equality" - which is why presently progressives are obsessed with stealing from one and giving to another.

Do you not understand that stealing is wrong and living off the taxpayers is wrong???

Now, I realize that sometimes people fall on tough times, however we have a populace out there that have made it a policy to live for free off the taxpayers and given progressives and their actions they don't have any problem with that at all - as a matter of fact some progressives call that "justice."

Furthermore the progressive elitists in government have no desire to solve poverty - you know why? because these elitist clowns need someone to pander to (the poor) and they need to pay them off for their progressive vote.

If these people didn't need or want the free money the progressives love to hand out like candy then they wouldn't need the democratic party, which in turn would eradicate the democratic party entirely...

Also, the notion these progressive elitists are trying to help people is laughable -- these assholes aren't trying to help you, they're doing what they do for self preservation. These elitist progressives in government would cull you if you got in their way and if they could get away with it.

I have even worse news for you; appeals to ignorance are irrelevant. In case you missed it, a market friendly solution could lower our tax burden by better ensuring full employment of resources in the market for labor; by using existing legal and physical infrastructure in our republic.
 
Heya JMAC.....wonder what country in Human history ever got rid of poverty? Do you think they can name one? Just one throughout mankind's history on this planet?

Oh and on that Jobs issue.


Why 100,000 jobs a month won't lower unemployment rate.....

How's that? Well, if the whole economy, including government, ticked along at a pace of 100,000 job gains per month, it wouldn't be fast enough to account for natural demographic growth in the labor force. A rising population means about that many new people should be entering the workforce each month.

So a modest pace of 100,000 jobs a month is certainly better than declines, but it doesn't begin to fill America's jobs hole. .....snip~

Why 100,000 jobs a month won't lower unemployment rate - CSMonitor.com
]

So what? How many countries have landed a person on Mars? Solving simple poverty in our republic doesn't require rocket science, and we have already been to the moon and back.
 
I have even worse news for you; appeals to ignorance are irrelevant. In case you missed it, a market friendly solution could lower our tax burden by better ensuring full employment of resources in the market for labor; by using existing legal and physical infrastructure in our republic.
He didn't miss it, because it was never there.

Your words are meaningless and empty.

Put some detail into it.
 
He didn't miss it, because it was never there.

Your words are meaningless and empty.

Put some detail into it.

They aren't meaningless or empty, just because you don't have a clue or a Cause. Remember, this is in the public domain, not just some special pleading venue.
 
They aren't meaningless or empty, just because you don't have a clue or a Cause. Remember, this is in the public domain, not just some special pleading venue.
Ah, but I do have a clue, if perhaps not a cause (unless you're using those words for some other meaning).

And if I say your words are meaningless and empty, they damn well are.

Put some detail into it.
 
Ah, but I do have a clue, if perhaps not a cause (unless you're using those words for some other meaning).

And if I say your words are meaningless and empty, they damn well are.

Put some detail into it.

i have put some detail into it in the past and only got fallacies and affirmative action from the moderators, for all of the other ones.

What is so difficult about solving simple poverty through unemployment compensation that clears our poverty guidelines on an at-will basis?
 
i have put some detail into it in the past and only got fallacies and affirmative action from the moderators, for all of the other ones.

What is so difficult about solving simple poverty through unemployment compensation that clears our poverty guidelines on an at-will basis?
It's a meaningless statement that conveys no information beyond a vague, half-formed, idea (ideal?), thus not allowing response without....

Put some detail into it.
 
I am going run this through a "normal person speak" translator for everyone so they can understand just what the hell you are saying....


I have even worse news for you;

Translation: I am going to spew formerly spewed nonsense so as to not address anything relevant...

appeals to ignorance are irrelevant.

Translation: Everything is a fallacy, that way I need not address anything that doesn't agree with my own opinions..

In case you missed it, a market friendly solution could lower our tax burden by better ensuring full employment of resources in the market for labor; by using existing legal and physical infrastructure in our republic.

Translation: Just fire up the printing presses regardless of the damage that does to the dollar, and give everyone a check regardless of the damage that does to the work force numbers.

Problem is people that daniel is spewing this literally from Mom, and Dad's basement, while he himself doesn't work a job at all, and is proud of, as he puts it, "getting an allowance".... I am guessing 15, maybe 16 years old. So, I am done with this guy, he doesn't know the simplest of economic consequences of his regurgitated rhetoric. He is literally a waste of time.

Now of course he'll come in here to respond to this and make some pathetic claim of victory, or fallacy, or some other nonsense, but I feel sorry for his parents, I truly do...I wonder if they know that he will be there, in their house until he's 40?

 
i have put some detail into it in the past and only got fallacies and affirmative action from the moderators, for all of the other ones.

What is so difficult about solving simple poverty through unemployment compensation that clears our poverty guidelines on an at-will basis?

Why must you constantly spew this nonsense? You are not going to get unemployment benefits simply because you elect not to work. Give up on this silly dream to simply kick back in your parent's home and get an allowance (via a UI check) from the gov't. Try actually working - many actually do so. ;)
 
Why must you constantly spew this nonsense? You are not going to get unemployment benefits simply because you elect not to work. Give up on this silly dream to simply kick back in your parent's home and get an allowance (via a UI check) from the gov't. Try actually working - many actually do so. ;)

why are you advocating the moral turpitude of bearing false witness to our own laws?
 
I have even worse news for you; appeals to ignorance are irrelevant. In case you missed it, a market friendly solution could lower our tax burden by better ensuring full employment of resources in the market for labor; by using existing legal and physical infrastructure in our republic.

Our problems with poverty has everything to do with the government and nothing to do with resources.

Hell, I could solve poverty in the United States in 2 seconds.... It's easy - minimum wage should be scaled to regional standard of living. If you're having a problem understanding what I'm saying or trying to say - 10 bucks will go a lot further in a place like Green Bay, Wisconsin than it would in Chicago, yet we have a federal minimum wage.

The fundamental problem with our economy beyond crony capitalism and a government that steals is the fact that our economy is locally and regionally based yet our government and even many economists refuse to acknowledge that.
 
It's a meaningless statement that conveys no information beyond a vague, half-formed, idea (ideal?), thus not allowing response without....

Put some detail into it.

What is so difficult about solving simple poverty through unemployment compensation that clears our poverty guidelines on an at-will basis? Any questions or do you only have fallacy for your Cause.
 
I am going run this through a "normal person speak" translator for everyone so they can understand just what the hell you are saying....

Translation: I am going to spew formerly spewed nonsense so as to not address anything relevant...

Translation: Everything is a fallacy, that way I need not address anything that doesn't agree with my own opinions..

Translation: Just fire up the printing presses regardless of the damage that does to the dollar, and give everyone a check regardless of the damage that does to the work force numbers.

Problem is people that daniel is spewing this literally from Mom, and Dad's basement, while he himself doesn't work a job at all, and is proud of, as he puts it, "getting an allowance".... I am guessing 15, maybe 16 years old. So, I am done with this guy, he doesn't know the simplest of economic consequences of his regurgitated rhetoric. He is literally a waste of time.

Now of course he'll come in here to respond to this and make some pathetic claim of victory, or fallacy, or some other nonsense, but I feel sorry for his parents, I truly do...I wonder if they know that he will be there, in their house until he's 40?

Red herrings and diversions are just fallacies.

Why not solve for a natural rate of unemployment by using Socialism to bail out Capitalism, like usual.
 
Our problems with poverty has everything to do with the government and nothing to do with resources.

Hell, I could solve poverty in the United States in 2 seconds.... It's easy - minimum wage should be scaled to regional standard of living. If you're having a problem understanding what I'm saying or trying to say - 10 bucks will go a lot further in a place like Green Bay, Wisconsin than it would in Chicago, yet we have a federal minimum wage.

The fundamental problem with our economy beyond crony capitalism and a government that steals is the fact that our economy is locally and regionally based yet our government and even many economists refuse to acknowledge that.

I only agree with you to the extent our elected representatives can't muster up enough moral fortitude to bear true witness to our own laws.

How do you account for structural forms of unemployment?
 
It's a meaningless statement that conveys no information beyond a vague, half-formed, idea (ideal?), thus not allowing response without....

Put some detail into it.

wow, thats pretty much what I have been telling him.
 
too bad you only had diversions for your Cause. you are welcome to actually debate the issue and provide any rebuttals, if practicable, for you.

More mumbo jumbo that means nothing.

We might even be on the same side of this issue, I dunno because I'm either too stupid or too lazy to figure out what you are talking about, and you are either too confused or too scared to explain what you are talking about.

All I know is that according to you we could solve all of humanities issues if we just "mustered up enough moral fortitude to bear true witness to our own laws". Whatever that means.

Personally, I think that if we catchuped up enough renial tention to zebra false laws to our own witness, then the price of a piece of string would be about this long.
 
Last edited:
More mumbo jumbo that means nothing.

We might even be on the same side of this issue, I dunno because I'm either too stupid or too lazy to figure out what you are talking about, and you are either too confused or too scared to explain what you are talking about.

All I know is that according to you we could solve all of humanities issues if we just "mustered up enough moral fortitude to bear true witness to our own laws". Whatever that means.

Personally, I think that if we catchuped up enough renial tention to zebra false laws to our own witness, then the price of a piece of string would be about this long.

in that case, don't worry; even my propaganda and rhetoric covers the issues you may come across, eventually.
 
in that case, don't worry; even my propaganda and rhetoric covers the issues you may come across, eventually.

You are probably correct about that, except that I won't know because I don't know what your propaganda and rhetoric issues are.
 
While some of this is good news, many of those jobs are low wage. Many middle income and higher income jobs have not recovered. This is a problem.
 
Back
Top Bottom