1/)Never said a law was broken.
2.)Sure he is-- he speaks freely-- his job is at risk. Sorry- not free speech.
3.)Opinion as to the deleterious of non-work activity- yes. Trying to drive somebody out of a job was factual. That such activity is not an example of free speech? factual.
4.)It succeeded twice.
5.)they did not practice their rights.
6.)Facts prove me correct.
7.)And the employees of Mozzilla swung their fist and made contact...
8.)Not at all.
9.)No law was broken by Eich. He supported the lawful remedy in the state of California to actions by the legislature.
10.)No lies.
11.)No analogy given.
12.)Well, Californians have the right to overturn an act of the legislature. Eich exercised that right.
13.)Beats me-- you are the one claiming free speech rights are limited-- right to swing a fist stops upon contact with another person you might recall. We know for example that workers (including CEO's) have a right to work in an harassment free envioronment-- trying to drive a employee out of his or her job because of disagreement of views seems rather harassing.
1,) yes you did! why do you post lies?
should i qoute you? you claimed they allowed an unsafe work environment. that would be breaking the law, again learn how to qoute and your posts wont fails so fast
2.) thank you for admitting you are wrong, you just said he speaks freely thats all free speach is he has ZERO right for there not to be consequences of his speech. Further proof you dont understand rights. Thank you for proving this fact. It is free speech and your point fails again
3.) thank yoiu again for doubling down are your complete wrong statement
example, i have every right to say i dont think you should post here, i have ever right to tell everybody and tell the mods/owner you shouldnt. and i have ever right to boycott until you are not posting here
are you claiming i dont? i Hope not
ALL factually free speech, your point fails again
4.) nope facts just destroyed it again people have every right to speech as proven sorry this bothers you.
If you disagree all you have to do is factually prove people arent allowed to voice thier opinion that he shouldn't work there and boycott while he does. all your attempts will fail and youll probably dodge this request.
5.) again facts already prove this wrong, let me know when this changes
6.) except you have none the laws, facts rights and court cases prove you all wrong. Remind us what you have on your side again that says the law, rights and court cases are wrong? lol
7.) nope, no laws were broken, his speech is 100% allowed another complete failure, example pleas, back up your failed claims with facts
8.) yes its a factually lie, if you disagree simply look up the case lol prove your lie
9.) the BAKER, please keep up lol
10.) yes its a lie if you disagree look up the case and prove it, i cant wait to read it
11.) another lie you are making an analogy that what OC cupid is doing is the same as what the customers did to the baker this is false
12.) yes he did and so did the employees, and customers
13.) there you go claiming the law was broken again Translation: you have ZERO facts to support the lie that the employees dont have free speech
facts win again and your post fails again
I bet you dodge the requests again
let me know when this changes and you have anything to support you failed claims
