- Joined
- Jul 10, 2011
- Messages
- 5,189
- Reaction score
- 1,932
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
You know which governments also interfered in peoples sexlives?
Iran, when it abolished contraceptions and abortions after 1979. A step so stupid even these savage fanatics legalised contraceptions again later.
And communist Rumenia. It outlawed abortion and contraception, to make things worse: the government there actualy forced all teenage girls and young women to undergo regular inspections by government nurses to make sure that when one got pregnant - she stayed pregnant.
What`s it like being in company like that?
It's a pretty serious stretch to compare outright banning of BC and abortion to the law in Texas. Not a very honest attempt at debate.
You know which governments also interfered in peoples sexlives?
Iran, when it abolished contraceptions and abortions after 1979. A step so stupid even these savage fanatics legalised contraceptions again later.
And communist Rumenia. It outlawed abortion and contraception, to make things worse: the government there actualy forced all teenage girls and young women to undergo regular inspections by government nurses to make sure that when one got pregnant - she stayed pregnant.
What`s it like being in company like that?
It is considering that the people who wanted the law passed are authoritarian swamp people screaching "abortion holocaust" with their repulsive toothless gobs.
They also live in buildings and wear clothes.
What's it like being in company like that?
Since when is the wearing of clothes an indication of how radical your political alignment is?
That's true of everyone, on everything.Cons LOVE government over regulation when it's something THEY like.
Cons LOVE government over regulation when it's something THEY like.
It is considering that the people who wanted the law passed are authoritarian swamp people screaching "abortion holocaust" with their repulsive toothless gobs.
You mean like mandatory health insurance?Conservatives cheer when innocent human life if protected. Imagine that!
You mean like mandatory health insurance?
I fail to see how that is possible? Isn't a healthy nation a better and stronger nation? Considering that we already spend more on "healthcare" than anyone else, if we took that money and made sure that it actually was spent on making people healthy we would be better off and could also save some of that money.It can be questioned that mandatory health care is advantageous to us or not.
What are individual needs? Can anyone predict with any certainty what illness or accident will befall them? The need is to cover medical expenses as they occur, nothing more nothing less.Before this mandatory health care, health care cost less and offered more of what an individual needs
Lets not make this political, but other than that corporate greed comes back to mind.Also, the medical community, with all it's flaws, ran much smoother than it does now under the control of the Obama administration.
It can be questioned that mandatory health care is advantageous to us or not. Before this mandatory health care, health care cost less and offered more of what an individual needs, not blanket, one-size-fits-all coverage for all, regardless of need. Also, the medical community, with all it's flaws, ran much smoother than it does now under the control of the Obama administration.