- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 57,470
- Reaction score
- 14,587
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The scotus hasn't ruled on *this* in particular and thus it's open to concern and discussion. What's the purpose of the group: to inform or to harass? Anyway - I think their behavior, attitudes, and actions are what would make it tolerable or not. If they cross lines it's obvious they shouldn't be allowed to carry on.
Either way: I think it's distasteful to display anything pertaining to bodily functions or gore in a lunch hall (regardless of what it is). Outside of an eating area: I don't care so much.
They don't have to Rule on a specific case. they have already ruled on subsequent cases that apply in the same regard.
right their action do but that doesn't mean you can suppress those action just because you think they might happen.
They hadn't crossed any lines.
that is your opinion 1st amendment trumps your opinion.