• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:76]

Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

The ultimate failure of conservatism and libertarianism can be found right here.

Maybe American libertarianism, but that is far from representative of the left libertarian (the original libertarian) movement.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Not really true.

Lives were short, but that was mainly parasites and disease.

On average, primitive people worked about 20 hours a week.

Original affluent society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just wiki, but i've read a lot on the subject over the years.

People in resource rich areas work less, those in less rich ateas more, but the whole "nasty, brutish and short" was salve for colonialists consciences. Not objective 7ruth.

All false.

The original affluent society is nonsensical bunk.

The fact is regardless of availability of resources primitive peoples worked sunup to sunset every day of their lives just to stay alive.

They may not have known any better way and therefore took it in stride but they lived in what would now be considered misery and poverty.

Lives were short due to never ending brutal work to get food. The never ending warfare which accompanies such ways of living. Disease and parasites not to mention no modern medicine which led to massively higher infant mortality and death from what today are minor injuries and illnesses.

The whole point of the original affluent society is to paint a picture that capitalism started poverty which is an easily proven falsehood. The idea of primitive peoples leading such idealic lives is proven revisionist fiction
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

It is really astounding that the best counter arguments are really nothing more than ignorant partisan talking points or outright fabrications.
Why can't anyone offer a criticism or counterarguments based on the merits or lack of, of the study or the opposite, the merits of overconsumption and large economic inequality? After all 'let them eat cake' has world so well in the past.

Overconsumption and economic inequality are in fact entirely subjective and no scientific data or evidence proves they are harmful.

That is why such counterarguments are not needed. All one needs to know is that these ideas are political beleifs and not scientific theory or studies and therefore the burden of proof is on those asserting such ideas, proof and evidence is that which they fail to provide.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Do you assume we need an earthlike planet to move out of the gravity well?

Energy is ridiculously abundant in space, and the moon has water (oxygen/fuel) and gravity (to slow bone loss)

And 100,000 years of raw materials at projected growth rates in the asteroid belt.

Doesn't seem "impossible" to me.

Um no water food fuel and oxygen would have to be sent to the moon and asteroids.

They have yet to find vioable sources of these necessary resources on the moon or elsewhere. The raw materials of the asteroid belt ( which we are centuries away from being capable of exploiting ) are mainly specific minerals.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Should we start trying to find a can of Ubik?
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

All false.

The original affluent society is nonsensical bunk.

The fact is regardless of availability of resources primitive peoples worked sunup to sunset every day of their lives just to stay alive.

They may not have known any better way and therefore took it in stride but they lived in what would now be considered misery and poverty.

Lives were short due to never ending brutal work to get food. The never ending warfare which accompanies such ways of living. Disease and parasites not to mention no modern medicine which led to massively higher infant mortality and death from what today are minor injuries and illnesses.

The whole point of the original affluent society is to paint a picture that capitalism started poverty which is an easily proven falsehood. The idea of primitive peoples leading such idealic lives is proven revisionist fiction

Anthropology, dude. Study it.

Historical fact doesn't threaten your precious global finance capitalism.

We have more comfort and toys. We work more for it. It is what it is.

The primitive lifestyle ship has sailed. We exceeded the natural carrying capacity long ago.

Polynesians alone belie your premise. They lived in abundance. Thousands of islands and the bounty of tropical seas.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Um no water food fuel and oxygen would have to be sent to the moon and asteroids.

They have yet to find vioable sources of these necessary resources on the moon or elsewhere. The raw materials of the asteroid belt ( which we are centuries away from being capable of exploiting ) are mainly specific minerals.

Moon has water. That's water, air and fuel.

Luddites is funny. Do you refuse to fly because folks like you considered it impossible?
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

If things are really that bad, then we have a very good reason to cut the strings and let the lazy, useless and non-productive among us. More reasons to end welfare. Let natural selection take them.

I say start with the retired military with their generous pensions and benefits leeching off of us working folks.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

I say start with the retired military with their generous pensions and benefits leeching off of us working folks.

Do you know how much military retirees, especially enlisted retirees actually make in pensions? Or what benefits they receive? Or how many of them actually retire and are not "working folks" themselves?

Would you accept cutting your retirement benefits also to pay for greater welfare benefits? A pensions is something that is earned, not just given.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

One other point worth mentioning is that the study does not specify between whether a collapse would be regional or global. Past collapses have been regional and not global in nature, though the world was not interconnected to the degree that it is today.

One can't discount the possibility that a relatively resource rich society with sufficient power to enforce its decision might not "disconnect" from the world at large. Nations have often acted in their interests and such a move would not be too far removed from the emergent concept of resource nationalism that has appeared in recent years. Already, China is slowly reducing the rare earth minerals it will permit to be exported. A more robust move to avert a collapse might entail some country's ending exports of its resources be it food, certain minerals, etc.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Anthropology, dude. Study it.

Historical fact doesn't threaten your precious global finance capitalism.

We have more comfort and toys. We work more for it. It is what it is.

The primitive lifestyle ship has sailed. We exceeded the natural carrying capacity long ago.

Polynesians alone belie your premise. They lived in abundance. Thousands of islands and the bounty of tropical seas.

Your source was one book which is not valid.

Anthropology in general proves your claim false.

Polynesians do not belie anything and we work less for more.

Primitive man in every part of the world was poor and living in misery sorry that I stated factas and sorry that you are ignorant of anthropology and history but you are now hit the books.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Moon has water. That's water, air and fuel.

Luddites is funny. Do you refuse to fly because folks like you considered it impossible?

Water is not air and food and the moon has no viable water for us to exploit
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Yeah... the idea that everyone would be happy if we all just had the same things/lived primitively is preposterous and ignores human nature. People by nature are different. We like different things, prefer different things, are motivated by different ideals, hold different values, have different physical and mental charicteristics, and approach the world from different perspectives. Those differences will inevitably give rise to individual and group conflict within and between any group/groups of people. Poverty is a an idea of relativity. Wherever there is difference, there will be poverty. Wherever there are at least two people, there will be differences between them. Both will be in states of relative poverty at the same time with regards to their differences. It is when individuals/groups allow their impoverishments to define them that conflict arises.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Your source was one book which is not valid.

Anthropology in general proves your claim false.

Polynesians do not belie anything and we work less for more.

Primitive man in every part of the world was poor and living in misery sorry that I stated factas and sorry that you are ignorant of anthropology and history but you are now hit the books.

Do you have some suggested reading?

Or are you just repeating what you heard somewhere?
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Water is not air and food and the moon has no viable water for us to exploit

Water is made of hydrogen and oxygen. So is rocket fuel. Once captured, water is constantly recycled. Lots of sunlight, unfiltered by atmosphere, is available for energy and growing food. Your ignorance is showing.

'Significant Amount' of Water Found on Moon | Space.com

The biggest obstacle is bone loss, and we may need the geneticists to solve that one.

But your resource argument is completely vapid.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Do you have some suggested reading?

Or are you just repeating what you heard somewhere?

Yes I suggest anthropology which you named but know nothing of.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Water is made of hydrogen and oxygen. So is rocket fuel. Once captured, water is constantly recycled. Lots of sunlight, unfiltered by atmosphere, is available for energy and growing food. Your ignorance is showing.

'Significant Amount' of Water Found on Moon | Space.com

The biggest obstacle is bone loss, and we may need the geneticists to solve that one.

But your resource argument is completely vapid.

Care to name a power plant for providing heat and light which runs off of hydrogen or oxygen?

Using rocket fuel is certianly using an energy source but every energy source is not viable for every energy need. Just as the applications for internal combustion are limited( one cannot launch a rocket into space using a fossil fuel internal combustion engine ) the applications for hydrogen and oxygen are limited.

Water is constantly recycled by the earth not by people. The moon has no ecosystem to recycle water and we have found the the idea of artificially recycling water for a permanent habitat is beyond our grasp.

The atmosphere filters sun light which ALLOWS plants to grow. Lack of such atmosphere ( and lack of magentic field ) means too much radiation and sun light to allow plant growth.

The water found is SIGNIFICANT but that is a highly subjective term. Much of what your link talks about is theory which is far beyond our current level of technology to exploit. This is why the article constantly refers to potential much the same way gravity is a potential energy source but we are a long way from harnassing it for any meaningful application.

My resource argument is compltely factual yours is more akin to science fiction
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Yes I suggest anthropology which you named but know nothing of.

I've been looking and cqn't find anything to refute my position.

So yer gonna gave to put up or shut up.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Care to name a power plant for providing heat and light which runs off of hydrogen or oxygen?

Using rocket fuel is certianly using an energy source but every energy source is not viable for every energy need. Just as the applications for internal combustion are limited( one cannot launch a rocket into space using a fossil fuel internal combustion engine ) the applications for hydrogen and oxygen are limited.

Water is constantly recycled by the earth not by people. The moon has no ecosystem to recycle water and we have found the the idea of artificially recycling water for a permanent habitat is beyond our grasp.

The atmosphere filters sun light which ALLOWS plants to grow. Lack of such atmosphere ( and lack of magentic field ) means too much radiation and sun light to allow plant growth.

The water found is SIGNIFICANT but that is a highly subjective term. Much of what your link talks about is theory which is far beyond our current level of technology to exploit. This is why the article constantly refers to potential much the same way gravity is a potential energy source but we are a long way from harnassing it for any meaningful application.

My resource argument is compltely factual yours is more akin to science fiction

Uhhh...

Sunshines on solar panels, unfiltered by atmosphere. This produces electricity. Lots of it.

Electic lights and heating are century old technology.

You are aware that they grow plants on the ISS, right?

You keep SAYING stuff. Do you have anything to cite?

You keep talking nonsense while completely ignoring the two main difficulties: bone loss and radiation. Both of which can be mitigated on the moon.

As with the anthropoly bit, put up or shut up.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

I've been looking and cqn't find anything to refute my position.

So yer gonna gave to put up or shut up.

I did put up and you did not look you just are too childish to deasl with ignorance
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Overconsumption and economic inequality are in fact entirely subjective and no scientific data or evidence proves they are harmful.
Riiiiiights, thanks for the opinion.

That is why such counterarguments are not needed.
More like you are not able to, so you dismiss, typical.
 
Last edited:
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Uhhh...

Sunshines on solar panels, unfiltered by atmosphere. This produces electricity. Lots of it.

Electic lights and heating are century old technology.

You are aware that they grow plants on the ISS, right?

You keep SAYING stuff. Do you have anything to cite?

You keep talking nonsense while completely ignoring the two main difficulties: bone loss and radiation. Both of which can be mitigated on the moon.

As with the anthropoly bit, put up or shut up.

SOlar pane,s are now like plants to you?

Here is a clue for the clueless solar panels are manufactured from various materials. Plants are living organisims. Your comparison is a false one and a failure.

Also for your general information solar panels do not produce electricity they transfer solar energy to batteries.

Yes they grow plants on the iSS and protect them from direct exposure to radiation and sunlight unless they are attempting to sudy the effects of said direct sunlight.

It is you saying stuff which is irgnorant and without any bassis in science.

Try alibrary for your ignorance in both anthropology and science
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Riiiiiights, thanks for the opinion.

More like you are to able to so you dismiss, typical.

An opinion in answer to opinion.

Dismissal of opinon? Sure
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

Care to name a power plant for providing heat and light which runs off of hydrogen or oxygen?

Using rocket fuel is certianly using an energy source but every energy source is not viable for every energy need. Just as the applications for internal combustion are limited( one cannot launch a rocket into space using a fossil fuel internal combustion engine ) the applications for hydrogen and oxygen are limited.

Water is constantly recycled by the earth not by people. The moon has no ecosystem to recycle water and we have found the the idea of artificially recycling water for a permanent habitat is beyond our grasp.

The atmosphere filters sun light which ALLOWS plants to grow. Lack of such atmosphere ( and lack of magentic field ) means too much radiation and sun light to allow plant growth.

The water found is SIGNIFICANT but that is a highly subjective term. Much of what your link talks about is theory which is far beyond our current level of technology to exploit. This is why the article constantly refers to potential much the same way gravity is a potential energy source but we are a long way from harnassing it for any meaningful application.

My resource argument is compltely factual yours is more akin to science fiction

NASA - Habitation Systems Project - NASA's Deep Space Habitat

Perhaps you should read up on where we are at before making predictions about what cannot be done. NASA has been doing various space habitat studies for decades.

This should interest you since you're concerned about food. NASA - LED Lights Used in Plant Growth Experiments for Deep Space Missions

We use semi-closed nuclear systems on submarines, or maybe the are fully closed, don't know that much about their power plants, since the 1950s. Really think it is that hard to add cooling tubes to reclaim the water and re-use it? Nuclear reaction causes heat, heat turns water to steam, steam turns turbines, turbines turn generators, generators make electricity. Recycle the water and repeat. Not to mention lots and lots of room for solar panels without the atmosphere soaking up energy or reflecting back into space.

Recycling water is easy, heat until turned to steam, run steam through cooling loops, you get distilled water. Put in a lead lining to block radiation and you probably could recycle water while generating electrical power.

Those plants up there that they can grow with LEDs need fertilizer. Well, what do you know, what comes out of us after eating plants contains a lot of what those plants need. So after separating out the water, burn or heat to level to kill bacteria, feed to plants.

Oxygen, hmm, lets see, humans and other animals take in oxygen, give off CO2. Plants take in CO2 and give off oxygen. Guess they need enough plants to augment the scrubbers.

Bone density problem is easily solved by generating a sort of artificial gravity, kind of like a hamsters wheel. Just make sure everyone spends enough time in there.
 
Re: Nasa-funded study: industrial civilisation headed for 'irreversible collapse'?[W:

An opinion in answer to opinion.
No, you offered an opinion where you were unable to offer something meaningful or relevant, not to mention intelligent.
 
Back
Top Bottom