- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: New Jersey Judge Blocks Dad From Delivery Room
1.) its not her "wishes" its her right, VERY large difference
2.) doesnt matter how he became the father he rights are still her rights
3.) this also doesnt matter to her rights
4.) see #3
5.) the father has no right to violate the womans rights, theres no weight to give.
6.) another thing that factually doesnt matter, that was her CHOICE just like it is now. would this excuse work for a peeping tom? of course not because it has no logical merit.
7.) You are free to have this opinion and you maybe 100% right but that doesn't take away her rights
8.) this also doesnt matter if a women chooses to have sex then decides to stop half way though is it ok to just continue? i mean she already made her decision right? again, of course not because that makes no logica sense
9.) you are free to think that but theres no laws or rights that support that thought.
1.)Again, I am not saying that the father should be there during the labor, I would honor the mother's wishes for privacy then.
2.) But in this case we are not even talking about a father who became a father by way of a casual sexual encounter are we? If it were then I think in a case of a casual relationship, then it would at least be more reasonable to impose a strict separation of the two parties at the hospital.
3.) However in this case the father was her fiance.
4.)This woman made a decision with this man to not only make this baby, but also at one point to be his wife.
5.) I give more weight in this case to the father on those grounds.
6.) How much "privacy" did this woman have when she was sleeping with this man and living with him for a long time?
7.) I'm sorry, but without proof that there was abuse by this man, I think this woman is being a spoiled brat.
8.) She made decisions well before the point of delivering a baby that involved this man
9.) and I think this judge got it wrong.
1.) its not her "wishes" its her right, VERY large difference
2.) doesnt matter how he became the father he rights are still her rights
3.) this also doesnt matter to her rights
4.) see #3
5.) the father has no right to violate the womans rights, theres no weight to give.
6.) another thing that factually doesnt matter, that was her CHOICE just like it is now. would this excuse work for a peeping tom? of course not because it has no logical merit.
7.) You are free to have this opinion and you maybe 100% right but that doesn't take away her rights
8.) this also doesnt matter if a women chooses to have sex then decides to stop half way though is it ok to just continue? i mean she already made her decision right? again, of course not because that makes no logica sense
9.) you are free to think that but theres no laws or rights that support that thought.