• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Charity offers to pay for 7-year-old's lifesaving treatment; drug maker still refuses

Renae

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
50,241
Reaction score
19,243
Location
San Antonio Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative
A pediatric cancer charity is offering to pay for 7-year-old cancer survivor Josh Hardy to receive lifesaving medication that could cure him of a potentially deadly virus.
But Chimerix, the pharmaceutical company that produces the medication, is still refusing to give Josh the treatment he so desperately needs. In fact, a representative for the charity said he tried speaking with Chimerix CEO Kevin Moch about Josh's case - but Moch hung up on him.
Charity offers to pay for 7-year-old's lifesaving treatment; drug maker still refuses | Fox News

Poor kid, hope he gets the drugs he needs. On a side note, my wife used to work for Mr. Moch and was floored to see him on the front page.
 
Re: Charity offers to pay for 7-year-old's lifesaving treatment; drug maker still ref

Charity offers to pay for 7-year-old's lifesaving treatment; drug maker still refuses | Fox News

Poor kid, hope he gets the drugs he needs. On a side note, my wife used to work for Mr. Moch and was floored to see him on the front page.

It's not approved by the FDA.

This means one thing - it's not the CEO that's putting the kai-bosh on this. It's the gaggle of Big Pharm lawyers covering their asses saying no.
 
Last edited:
Re: Charity offers to pay for 7-year-old's lifesaving treatment; drug maker still ref

It's not approved by the FDA. This means one thing - it's not the CEO that's putting the kai-bosh on this. It's the gaggle of Big Pharm lawyers covering their asses saying no.

According to the report that company has given hundreds of doses away and the CEO is reported to have claimed he put a stop to it because the company couldn't afford it.
 
Re: Charity offers to pay for 7-year-old's lifesaving treatment; drug maker still ref

According to the report that company has given hundreds of doses away and the CEO is reported to have claimed he put a stop to it because the company couldn't afford it.

That's not exactly what I'm reading.
Thousands beg company to give medication to sick boy

It seems that the drug is still in clinical trials and that this kid doesn't match the criteria for those trials.
 
Back
Top Bottom