• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Record Support for Gay Marriage[W:162:334]

Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

People are also afraid of being called bigots, or hateful if they don't cower in acquiescence. One can disagree with Homosexuality without hate or malice, but not in this day and age because our society has been warped into a lie.


what lie?
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

I am left handed.

I am not sure what you are trying to say. I had assumed by perverted you meant gay, I personally don't believe homosexuality is a perversion, but enough here do, that I make the assumption.

sorry im trying to say the relation ship is not perverted just long so it doesn't quite demonstrate a long lasting perverted relationship

I can only imagine being gay would be like being perverted in the sense that its an unusual deviation from the norm like being left handed
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

People are also afraid of being called bigots, or hateful if they don't cower in acquiescence. One can disagree with Homosexuality without hate or malice, but not in this day and age because our society has been warped into a lie.

ok then

homosexuality is bad because?

your not being an asshole for having a problem with it because?
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage[W:162]

Thats impossible

Because they dont fit the states definition of marriage. And again i dont want anyone getting benefits for being married

So polygamy means one man and many women? Thats not the only way. How about 1 woman with many husbands?
Yes you should try some logic.

LOLOL You just wrote, AGAIN, that gays cant reproduce...and yet they do all the time....are you seriously not aware of that???

And the issue is why they dont qualify for those benefits...because they are discriminated against...is there a reason you cant connect the sentences from one post to another...or you just have no good answer. No good answer I'm pretty sure, or you would have provided it by now...besides (the ridiculous) the cant have kids.

And I never said polygamy only meant one man, multiple women, my comment only applied to women in that particular arrangement. I think either arrangement should be legal.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage[W:162]

you cant use the same tactics as anti interracialmarriage racists and say theirs no comparison you act like oppressive racists so your getting compered to them deal with it
So now im a racist because i think gay marriage is a dumb idea ?

Heres what I think of most of you gay marriage advoctes

big·ot
[big-uht] Show IPA
noun
a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
Im perfectly tolerant of your views I just disagree. i dont go around disparaging you because of it unless attacked first.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

ok then

homosexuality is bad because?

your not being an asshole for having a problem with it because?

If you don't agree with me, you're a bad person! I WIN!


Group think is dangerous, dishonest group think is even worse.

I don't have a problem with homosexuality, could careless if you're gay or not. But I also have no problem with people believe a Straight, Christian upbringing is best for their families.


You, are very intolerant.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

what lie?

You don't see the lies, you are blinded, willfully or otherwise.

dishonest debate, emotional stupidity, Orwell nailed it.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

You don't see the lies, you are blinded, willfully or otherwise.

dishonest debate, emotional stupidity, Orwell nailed it.


ill try again, what lies specifically

im guessing you have no answer cause you made it up lol
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

Im not suggesting Im stating facts. No where in the constitution does it give SCOTUS that power

So you'll stop referring to them in some kind of fashion as the basis for your argument as to why something is or isn't constitutional?
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage[W:162]

So now im a racist because i think gay marriage is a dumb idea ?

Heres what I think of most of you gay marriage advoctes


Im perfectly tolerant of your views I just disagree. i dont go around disparaging you because of it unless attacked first.

no your just comparable to the ones who used the same kinds of arguments as you do
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

If you don't agree with me, you're a bad person! I WIN!


Group think is dangerous, dishonest group think is even worse.

I don't have a problem with homosexuality, could careless if you're gay or not. But I also have no problem with people believe a Straight, Christian upbringing is best for their families.


You, are very intolerant.

if you give other people **** for no good reason your a bad person

so again please explain why your not
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

ill try again, what lies specifically

im guessing you have no answer cause you made it up lol

It was an attempt to describe a bigger issue I have with society, but you're playing gotcha bull**** and psuedo-intellectual elitism... which is part of the problem.

Let's me try this:

I don't have a problem with a traditional hetrosexual christian family, group or life.

What's your reaction to this?
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

if you give other people **** for no good reason your a bad person

so again please explain why your not

This is part of the Lie AGENT J I speak of. Here I am being attacked with bull****, because I don't have blargs opinion on Gay Marriage. He thinks I'm attacking Gay Marriage or homosexuals because like a dog to a dinner bell he's been trained to react like this. To push an agenda he doesn't understand, an opinion he cannot formulate all out of fear of being "hateful".
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

1.)It was an attempt to describe a bigger issue I have with society
2.) but you're playing gotcha bull**** and psuedo-intellectual elitism... which is part of the problem.
3.)Let's me try this:
I don't have a problem with a traditional hetrosexual christian family, group or life.

What's your reaction to this?

1.) which is?
2.) nope wrong again im simply asking YOU to explain and support YOUR statement, this should be very easy since it was YOUR statement
i will ask you AGAIN and you will probably dodge it again because you have no answer, you made it up

3.) reaction? why would anybody have a reaction to that?

you just described my family, im a christian :shrug:

let me know when you have an example of what you are talking about
 
Last edited:
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

This is part of the Lie AGENT J I speak of. Here I am being attacked with bull****, because I don't have blargs opinion on Gay Marriage. He thinks I'm attacking Gay Marriage or homosexuals because like a dog to a dinner bell he's been trained to react like this. To push an agenda he doesn't understand, an opinion he cannot formulate all out of fear of being "hateful".

no ones trained me except for people like you who I can observe

come on you have some reasons why you not just making peoples lives mildly worse with your problem with homosexuality spit it out.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

I like your quote by H.L. Mencken. Here is another one:

"Liberty and democracy are eternal enemies, and every one knows it who has ever given any sober reflection to the matter. A democratic state may profess to venerate the name, and even pass laws making it officially sacred, but it simply cannot tolerate the thing. In order to keep any coherence in the governmental process, to prevent the wildest anarchy in thought and act, the government must put limits upon the free play of opinion. In part, it can reach that end by mere propaganda, by the bald force of its authority — that is, by making certain doctrines officially infamous. But in part it must resort to force, i.e., to law. One of the main purposes of laws in a democratic society is to put burdens upon intelligence and reduce it to impotence. Ostensibly, their aim is to penalize anti-social acts; actually their aim is to penalize heretical opinions. At least ninety-five Americans out of every 100 believe that this process is honest and even laudable; it is practically impossible to convince them that there is anything evil in it. In other words, they cannot grasp the concept of liberty. Always they condition it with the doctrine that the state, i.e., the majority, has a sort of right of eminent domain in acts, and even in ideas — that it is perfectly free, whenever it is so disposed, to forbid a man to say what he honestly believes. Whenever his notions show signs of becoming "dangerous," ie, of being heard and attended to, it exercises that prerogative. And the overwhelming majority of citizens believe in supporting it in the outrage. Including especially the Liberals, who pretend — and often quite honestly believe — that they are hot for liberty. They never really are. Deep down in their hearts they know, as good democrats, that liberty would be fatal to democracy — that a government based upon shifting and irrational opinion must keep it within bounds or run a constant risk of disaster. They themselves, as a practical matter, advocate only certain narrow kinds of liberty — liberty, that is, for the persons they happen to favor. The rights of other persons do not seem to interest them. If a law were passed tomorrow taking away the property of a large group of presumably well-to-do persons — say, bondholders of the railroads — without compensation and without even colorable reason, they would not oppose it; they would be in favor of it. The liberty to have and hold property is not one they recognize. They believe only in the liberty to envy, hate and loot the man who has it."

Well, Mencken couldn't be right about everything. He was also a confirmed anti-Semite and thought the stories of how the Jews were being treated in Germany was just British propaganda. That he was an elitist is undeniable. I don't admire Mencken. I do like his quote, however.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

no ones trained me except for people like you who I can observe

come on you have some reasons why you not just making peoples lives mildly worse with your problem with homosexuality spit it out.
I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH HOMOSEXUALITY.

You have been trained to think that way because I believe there is nothing wrong with a traditional christian hetrosexual life.

You are trained, you are not observant, you have been given triggers and told how to behave, the bell is ringing and you're drooling.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

1.) which is?
2.) nope wrong again im simply asking YOU to explain and support YOUR statement, this should be very easy since it was YOUR statement
i will ask you AGAIN and you will probably dodge it again because you have no answer, you made it up

3.) reaction? why would anybody have a reaction to that?

you just described my family, im a christian :shrug:

let me know when you have an example of what you are talking about

I've been trying too. Look at Blargs reaction to me, that's part of the LIE that society has become.

"I'm TOLERANT! But if you don't agree with my world view, you're EVIL!!!"

Saul Alinsky 101, foisted on society and people don't even realize how they are being manipulated.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH HOMOSEXUALITY.

You have been trained to think that way because I believe there is nothing wrong with a traditional christian hetrosexual life.

You are trained, you are not observant, you have been given triggers and told how to behave, the bell is ringing and you're drooling.

Well, since it is typed in all capps, it must be true, and not a defensive mechanism.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

People are also afraid of being called bigots, or hateful if they don't cower in acquiescence. One can disagree with Homosexuality without hate or malice, but not in this day and age because our society has been warped into a lie.

You can disagree with homosexuality....just the same as people can despise black people or any other bigoted view. You can even espouse those views to your hearts content. What you cannot, however be, is free of the consequences of your speech if you choose to espouse it.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

Well, since it is typed in all capps, it must be true, and not a defensive mechanism.

Sure thing there buddy.

You got me. I'm one of the most pro-trans people on this board. But I secretly HATE GAYS! You got me....

/roll eyes.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

You can disagree with homosexuality....just the same as people can despise black people or any other bigoted view. You can even espouse those views to your hearts content. What you cannot, however be, is free of the consequences of your speech if you choose to espouse it.

Thanks for proving my point, useful you are.
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

It was an attempt to describe a bigger issue I have with society, but you're playing gotcha bull**** and psuedo-intellectual elitism... which is part of the problem.

Let's me try this:

I don't have a problem with a traditional hetrosexual christian family, group or life.

What's your reaction to this?

I don't either. People should be free to choose and marry who they love and who they want to have a family with. Agreed?
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

It was an attempt to describe a bigger issue I have with society, but you're playing gotcha bull**** and psuedo-intellectual elitism... which is part of the problem.

Let's me try this:

I don't have a problem with a traditional hetrosexual christian family, group or life.

What's your reaction to this?

you can have my reaction

that's mostly ok till you start going on about how evil other people are and try to pass laws based on nothing but your religion cause your book tells you to and you feel like listening to it

reminds me of going to church as a kid and occasionally all of these otherwise very nice people I knew would turn into assholes and stat condemning others based on faith alone 1 or 2 stupid Adam and eve not Adam and Steve lines was heard
 
Re: Record Support for Gay Marriage

Thanks for proving my point, useful you are.

No....your point was somehow you are not allowed to espouse your views. You absolutely are. But just like racist Bigots who choose to spout of their racial slurs or otherwise express their dislike of blacks or other minority groups....you do so with whatever the consequences that come your way.
 
Back
Top Bottom