• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ukraine accuses Russia of Occupation calls for help from US/UK

There's governments all around the world that do just that and claim legitimacy. You're real concerned about civilians except when its US drones killing them. And considering Nulands comments three weeks before this broke out, the US once again has bloody hands.

Ukrainians were murdered while protesting and you still complain about the USA. You must be a paid stooge.
 
A dead civilian is a dead civilian. Drones are misguided.

Ah yes, A dead civilian is a dead civilian just as a dog is a dog. Don't you agree that there's a difference between a Chihuahua and a Great Dane though?
Your attempt at painting moral equivalency between terrorists and protestors by stating the obvious is humorous but unconvincing.
 
The fix was in.

The Euros have been moving for twenty years toward laying their burden down and getting small. They have become increasingly uncomfortable with us because -- although we too want shrinking responsibilities -- we have declined more slowly and we have a clearer memory of the nobility of the cause that once called us to our higher duty. We are Banquo's ghost.:peace
 
Ukrainians were murdered while protesting and you still complain about the USA. You must be a paid stooge.

Stop name calling and think about this. I don't like anybody being killed, but you minimise the hostility of the protesters. These guys weren't the Wall Street protesters we had here. They became violent and started burning ****, and did in fact injure police, they broke out in violence, otherwise they likely wouldn't have been met with violence. I'm still wondering if Nuland planed for that. And who pays you to dismiss the US killing of civilians?
 
Ah yes, A dead civilian is a dead civilian just as a dog is a dog. Don't you agree that there's a difference between a Chihuahua and a Great Dane though?
Your attempt at painting moral equivalency between terrorists and protestors by stating the obvious is humorous but unconvincing.

We have for example right now terrorists working to overthrow president Assad in Syria, they're protesters too aren't they.
 
A dead civilian is a dead civilian. Drones are misguided.

lol is this serious? The US conducting drone strikes targeting belligerents that happen to kill civilians is the same as another country firing on its own people, in its own cities, that are protesting?

lol like I like, the logical gymnastics you put yourself through is just hilarious.
 
We have for example right now terrorists working to overthrow president Assad in Syria, they're protesters too aren't they.

Are they protesting? Or are they conducting attacks?

Do you not know the difference, or are you pretending to not know?
 
One wonders if Monte will support the US government firing on protesters. If they break some windows and set some fires, can the US government fire at will upon them? You'll support that, Monte?

Be serious.

Or, like I've told you for several days and across dozens of pages, BE CONSISTENT.
 
Are they protesting? Or are they conducting attacks?

Do you not know the difference, or are you pretending to not know?
al Qaeda right now compromise the bulk of the rebels fighting the Syrian government.

are you here solely as a disinformation agent?
 
lol is this serious? The US conducting drone strikes targeting belligerents that happen to kill civilians is the same as another country firing on its own people, in its own cities, that are protesting?

lol like I like, the logical gymnastics you put yourself through is just hilarious.

Your dishonesty is hilarious. Those '"protesters" were violent and were met with violence.
 
al Qaeda right now compromise the bulk of the rebels fighting the Syrian government.

are you here solely as a disinformation agent?

lolwut

I asked a question. I'm fairly certain I have much more of the information than you, though. But no, I'm here both as disinformation agent and a car salesman, are you in need?
 
One wonders if Monte will support the US government firing on protesters. If they break some windows and set some fires, can the US government fire at will upon them? You'll support that, Monte?

Be serious.

Or, like I've told you for several days and across dozens of pages, BE CONSISTENT.

I already told you, it's happened in America. Our NG has fired on Americans and killed them. It's only your hypocrisy that's consistent.
 
Your dishonesty is hilarious. Those '"protesters" were violent and were met with violence.

And you'd support the US acting the same way? Tell me you would, Monte.

This is about consistency. Tell me you would.
 
I already told you, it's happened in America. Our NG has fired on Americans and killed them. It's only your hypocrisy that's consistent.

Did I ever say it didn't happen in the US? This is why I mock your critical thinking skills. I didn't say it didn't happen in the US. I was asking if you'd supported it. Do you?
 
al Qaeda right now compromise the bulk of the rebels fighting the Syrian government.

are you here solely as a disinformation agent?

Yes he is, that's clear enough.
 
lolwut

I asked a question. I'm fairly certain I have much more of the information than you, though. But no, I'm here both as disinformation agent and a car salesman, are you in need?
I only see your arrogance, I do not see any proof that you " have much more of the information than me ".
 
I only see your arrogance, I do not see any proof that you " have much more of the information than me ".

I...don't care? I asked a question. If you read too far into it, that's your problem. Not mine. I'm here showing that Monte is ridiculously inconsistent. You're talking about al Qaeda? I don't care.
 
Did I ever say it didn't happen in the US? This is why I mock your critical thinking skills. I didn't say it didn't happen in the US. I was asking if you'd supported it. Do you?
That's a rather crazy question. What next if you can construe the next answer?
 
I...don't care? I asked a question. If you read too far into it, that's your problem. Not mine. I'm here showing that Monte is ridiculously inconsistent. You're talking about al Qaeda? I don't care.
Your an arrogant liar and denier. You posts are of low quality and little substance, you do not spread knowledge to anyone on this forum.
 
That's a rather crazy question. What next if you can construe the next answer?

What next? We'd either find out if Monte was in support of these things or not. Or, more likely, if he supported it when it fit the agenda he wanted to promote and didn't when it didn't.

This, the man he bemoans US tyranny on all fronts, is now supporting a nation firing on protesters. Does he support the US doing the same thing? That's the question.
 
Did I ever say it didn't happen in the US? This is why I mock your critical thinking skills. I didn't say it didn't happen in the US. I was asking if you'd supported it. Do you?

It depends, shooting people for standing around holding placards for change, no. Shooting people that are throwing Molotov cocktails at you, yes. Our police shoot people all the time for that and less. But your deflecting from the larger point. Putin and his non violent securing of his Crimean assets, that has every bodies knickers knotted up.
 
Your an arrogant liar and denier. You posts are of low quality and little substance, you do not spread knowledge to anyone on this forum.

lol okay
 
It depends, shooting people for standing around holding placards for change, no. Shooting people that are throwing Molotov cocktails at you, yes. Our police shoot people all the time for that and less. But your deflecting from the larger point. Putin and his non violent securing of his Crimean assets, that has every bodies knickers knotted up.

No, I'm not deflecting from the larger point, I'm focusing on your hypocrisy. So you wouldn't have minded if the US government opened fire during the Seattle WTO protests? That's now your stance. You who decries the American killing of American citizens overseas associated with terrorism- you don't mind them shooting at violent protesters. So what's the difference, then?
 
What next? We'd either find out if Monte was in support of these things or not. Or, more likely, if he supported it when it fit the agenda he wanted to promote and didn't when it didn't.

This, the man he bemoans US tyranny on all fronts, is now supporting a nation firing on protesters. Does he support the US doing the same thing? That's the question.

No, you're continuing with your dishonesty and misrepresentation of the violent mob in Kiev.
 
Back
Top Bottom