• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

1.) yes it was not only insane it was bat**** insane and i say that as a religious person, this bill was mentally inane and retarded lol
2.) im sure you believe that
3.) yes you have that opinion

Not opinion but fact and it was not insane.

There is nothing insane about protecting peoples rights
 
Not opinion but fact and it was not insane.
2.) There is nothing insane about protecting peoples rights

1.) nope just your opinion
2.) rights would have been violated
 
1.) nope just your opinion
2.) rights would have been violated

1 absolute fact not opinion you do not grasp the difference but you are still wrong.

2 not one persons rights would have been violated
 
1 absolute fact not opinion you do not grasp the difference but you are still wrong.
2.) not one persons rights would have been violated

1.) nope just your opinion and nothing else lMAO
yes i understand the difference this is why i recognize what your opinion is
2.) 100% factually false it would have temporarily empowered and allowed illegal discrimination until it got taken to court and thrown out
 
1.) nope just your opinion and nothing else lMAO
yes i understand the difference this is why i recognize what your opinion is
2.) 100% factually false it would have temporarily empowered and allowed illegal discrimination until it got taken to court and thrown out

Illegal discrimination is the violation of people's rights.

No one has the right to demand trade with another.

So you are proven wrong I stated fact which fail to graswp and you cannot name one person who would have had their right's violated

You are dismissed to go study
 
1.)Illegal discrimination is the violation of people's rights.
2.)No one has the right to demand trade with another.
3.)So you are proven wrong I stated fact which fail to graswp
4.) and you cannot name one person who would have had their right's violated
5.)
You are dismissed to go study

1.) correct
2.) good thing nobody is doing this
3.) nothing you said has proven me wrong, nothing LMAO
4.) already did ill post it AGAIN:
"100% factually false it would have temporarily empowered and allowed illegal discrimination until it got taken to court and thrown out"
5.) i accept your concession
 
1.) correct
2.) good thing nobody is doing this
3.) nothing you said has proven me wrong, nothing LMAO
4.) already did ill post it AGAIN:
"100% factually false it would have temporarily empowered and allowed illegal discrimination until it got taken to court and thrown out"
5.) i accept your concession

Yes it has proven you wrong so i will be more clear.

The violation of peoples rights is making private discrimination illegal.

The law which was vetoed would have protected that right and not one persons rights would have been violated.

You are defeated now run along it is a school night
 
1.)Yes it has proven you wrong so i will be more clear.
2.)The violation of peoples rights is making private discrimination illegal.
3.)The law which was vetoed would have protected that right and not one persons rights would have been violated.
4.)You are defeated now run along it is a school night

1.) nope you provided an opinion and claimed it as fact
2.) private discrimination is not illegal, thanks for proving yourself wrong
3.) private discrimination is legal so it doesn't need protecting, thank you again for proving yourself wrong
4.) well facts prove you wrong so try again
 
on the basis of race its illegal and it infringe on rights
facts win again

hence you post is factually wrong

You don't have the right to demand/ get service from a privately owned company.
 
Then Business owners should be allowed to deny service to anyone for any reason.
they can

people/business owners whoever just cant break the law and infringe on peoples rights :shrug:
 
they can

people/business owners whoever just cant break the law and infringe on peoples rights :shrug:

But if you agree on that getting a service isn't a right, then what right is being infringed on?
 
1.)But if you agree on that getting a service isn't a right
2.) then what right is being infringed on?

1.)i always find this weird

i haven tbeen asked if i agree or what my opinion is

its just the law and factual the getting service isnt a right

2.)are you serious or are you just messing around

this is like saying, you agree sex is legal then whats the big deal about rape? its intellectual dishonest

nobody here is saying they have the right to service, they dont or its illegal to deny service, it isint

but since i think you asked a question your not serios about ill simply answer with a silly question of my own.

if i walked in to Walmart and the owner cam running up to me and said get out of here we don't allow your "kind" here and that kind had to do with age, disability, national origin/color/race, religion, gender or sexual orientation

what LAWS would that violate
what RIGHTS of mine would be infringed on
what would i press charges for
 
But if you agree on that getting a service isn't a right, then what right is being infringed on?

also just to be clear that wast being smart

if you would like to now my opinion on something or if i agree with something simply ask that way
it just seems confusing in point sometimes when facts or law is being discussed
 
1.) nope you provided an opinion and claimed it as fact
2.) private discrimination is not illegal, thanks for proving yourself wrong
3.) private discrimination is legal so it doesn't need protecting, thank you again for proving yourself wrong
4.) well facts prove you wrong so try again

Wrong the civil rights act forbids private discrimination in businesses.

Facts once again which prove me correct and factual from the start and prove you out of touch with the difference between fact and opinion.

School is dismissed little one
 
1.) i agree 100%
2.) I agree 100%
3.) I agree 100%
4.) good thing thats factually not happening

:shrug:

tell me what you think this thread is about

its NOT about solely denying service
its NOT about solely discrimaintion

do you know what its about?

well I do know this thread strayed, before I entered it
 
1.)Wrong the civil rights act forbids private discrimination in businesses.
2.)Facts once again which prove me correct and factual from the start and prove you out of touch with the difference between fact and opinion.
3.)School is dismissed little one

1.) wrong it forbids ILLEGAL discrimination, HUGE difference. thank you for proving yourself wrong again
2.) wrong see #1 facts proved you wrong
3.) yes it is, hope you learned something and im glad i could educate you :)

facts win again
 
Last edited:
so you dont know i accept that

to hit the nail on the head, it was stated libertarians only believe in their liberty.

which is ridicules, libertarians believe in everyone's liberty, even people who make foolish. stupid, wrong headed decisions.

because being foolish , stupid, and making wrong decisions is not unlawful.

I am from AZ
 
1.) to hit the nail on the head, it was stated libertarians only believe in their liberty.
2.)which is ridicules, libertarians believe in everyone's liberty, even people who make foolish. stupid, wrong headed decisions.
3.)because being foolish , stupid, and making wrong decisions is not unlawful.

1.) this has NOTHING to do with anything i discussed
2.) this is FACTUALLY not true, on paper that might be the philosophy but in reality some very much dont give a **** about others lol
this is just reality its not picking on libertarians, there are some very smart and respected ones here and that i know in real life but they dont post often but anyway this gors for ALL groups

i could say on paper Christians are supposed to trun the other cheek and love all and not judge and on paper thats correct, in real life not so much lol

3.) also 100% factually false, it very well can be

but more importunately this post also has nothing to do with anything i discussed
 
1.) this has nothing to do with anything i discussed
2.) this is factually not true, on paper that might be the philosophy but in reality some very much dont give a **** about others lol
this is just reality its not picking on libertarians, there are some very smart and respected ones here and that i know in real life but they dont post often but anyway this gors for all groups

i could say on paper christians are supposed to trun the other cheek and love all and not judge and on paper thats correct, in real life not so much lol

3.) also 100% factually false, it very well can be

but more importunately this post also has nothing to do with anything i discussed

1...no it does not, but why I rebutted the thread
2 well i dont confess to every person, who identifies themselves as democract, republican, libertarian, all think in lock step.
3 how is it 100% false,people do foolish stupid, and wrong headed things everyday, and those things do not violate anyones rights.

People also to foolish stupid, wrong things everyday to, when they violate a person rights endanger the public then its unlawful

and you and i know a rights violation is never acceptable, even if a person you dont like rights are violated.
 
Last edited:
1.) wrong it forbids ILLEGAL discrimination, HUGE difference. thank you for proving yourself wrong again
2.) wrong see #1 facts proved you wrong
3.) yes it is, hope you learned something and im glad i could educate you :)

facts win again

Yes illegal private discrimination which is a violation of human rights this is the fact which proves you wrong.

Back to school with you
 
1.)Yes illegal private discrimination which is a violation of human rights this is the fact which proves you wrong.
2.)Back to school with you

1.) nope thats just your OPINION and nothing else, in FACT many human rights groups support the 14th and civil rights :lamo
2.) yep seems i have to keep educating you and proving your posts wrong lol
people and private orgs are not allowed to break the law and illegally discriminate
if you disagree by all means PLEASE factually prove otherwise, i cant wait to read this humor


facts win . . . AGAIN lol
 
people and private orgs are not allowed to break the law and illegally discriminate

why?

you have not explained why they are not allowed to do something even thought there is no rights violation, or health or safety violation.

why are you not allowed perform an action..... if their is no victim of rights infringement.
 
Back
Top Bottom