• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texas Gay Marriage Ban Latest to Be Struck Down[W:97]

Reading your posts is a challenge and even harder because you don't comprehend what your reading. Hypothetically speaking if there was a law you didn't agree with would you obey it.(for crying out loud) The religious belief that homosexuality is a sin is quite clear all over the bible and to ask a Christian to set a side they're beliefs for deviate behavior is intolerant. Surely that falls into the category of religious intolerance by insisting they set aside their beliefs for yours. I'm hoping you'll send me an invite when you tell God he got it all wrong and you know more than he does about life , the universe and everything. As far as my example goes, have you ever heard of pandoras box? I agree with one thing you hinted at though the owners providing the services should just say I'm booked. Well I'll enjoy my spiced rum and you do whatever it is you do.
 
1.)Reading your posts is a challenge and even harder because you don't comprehend what your reading.
2.) Hypothetically speaking if there was a law you didn't agree with would you obey it.(for crying out loud)
3.) The religious belief that homosexuality is a sin is quite clear all over the bible and to ask a Christian to set a side they're beliefs for deviate behavior is intolerant.
4.) Surely that falls into the category of religious intolerance by insisting they set aside their beliefs for yours.
5.) I'm hoping you'll send me an invite when you tell God he got it all wrong and you know more than he does about life , the universe and everything.
6.) As far as my example goes, have you ever heard of pandoras box?
7.) I agree with one thing you hinted at though the owners providing the services should just say I'm booked.
8.) Well I'll enjoy my spiced rum and you do whatever it is you do.

translation: you cant defend your claims we get it

1.)if your inability to say what you really mean bothers you fix it
2.) see now this is totally different if it doesnt apply to gay marriage which CAN NOT BE disobeyed lol a fact you missed
so cry out loud all you want the mistake is yours lol

there was a law i broke today, i was speeding so hypothetically having no basis behind your example yes its very possible i might not follow it like i did to day i sped

3.) first its not clear obviously since many religions support equal rights and secondly NOBODY is asking or forcing Christian to set aside thier beliefs. Im Christian this has no impact on my religion thats a fact. This mad up straman will never work, Like i said you disagree provide a FACTUAL example. You keep dodging this

4.) no based on the context of this thread religion is meaningless because its not impacted by equal rights for gays nor is its input needed nor does it have any meaning on this topic.
do you know what the word factual means? please provide a factual example

5.) who said this is going to happen? i never even said god got it wrong what i said is religion has nothing to do with legal marriage.
i know we all learned already you factually dont know what the law is and what rights are but dont start making stuff up please that will just make your posts fail worse

6.) yes, please focus on the word FACTUAL the failed fallacy and strawman of pandoras box and slipper slope will never be taken seriously by anybody educated and honest on this subject, holy cow. lol Please provide a FACTUALLY and intellectual honest argument and example.

7.) yes that would be the SMART thing to do instead of being an idiot

8.) Private stock? McDowells? Old Monk? Bacardi? enjoy
 
Well all you have is disrespect and insults so I'm very sure your church loves you. How old are you 15? To end this lousy attempt at a discussion or debate I'm sure your church supports enablers and it's Capt. Morgan. Don't worry we won't cross paths again.
 
1.)Well all you have is disrespect and insults so
2.)I'm very sure your church loves you.
3.)How old are you 15?
4.) To end this lousy attempt at a discussion or debate
5.) I'm sure your church supports enablers
6.) and it's Capt. Morgan.
7.)Don't worry we won't cross paths again.

1.) when did i disrespect you and insult you? lol
omitting out the fact that you do not know what the law is and rights are? thats just a fact
the first insult is yours and you just made it but it failed
2.) they do :shrug:
3.) you are decades off
4.) yes your attempt was lousy but thats ok, you simply were unaware that you didnt know the law and rights, im here to help
5.) enablers? what does that have to do with legal matters? oh thats right nothing lol
6.) one of my favs
7.) not worried i like educating people when they dont know stuff, any time just ask, thanks
 
translation: you wont do the homework it takes to prove your statement true and the link you provided already seems to prove it wrong.

let us know when this changes

us? got a frog in your pocket?
 
The article discusses the powers and guidelines for being an AG in Texas. You just didn't read it.
One question? Where was the AG when the case was being argued in federal District court in San Antonio? Was he agressively fighting the challenge from the campaing trail? Will he give this case its full attention when it goes to the before the 5th Circuit court?

No one can do two jobs effectively. I wonder what is more important to Abbott? To beat WD and become Governor or defending Texas' SSM ban?
 
Last edited:
One question? Where was the AG when the case was being argued in federal District court in San Antonio? Was he agressively fighting the challenge from the campaing trail? Will he give this case its full attention when it goes to the before the 5th Circuit court?

No one can do two jobs effectively. I wonder what is more important to Abbott? To beat WD and become Governor or defending Texas' SSM ban?

Well she's been ragging on him to quit defending this but, he's been working on the case. [and he has lawyer from his office at trial]

Wendy Davis calls on Greg Abbott to stop defending same-sex marriage ban - San Antonio Express-News

Judge denies Abbott
 
us? got a frog in your pocket?

all the people in this thread that proved you wrong and asked for the same :shrug: simple concept lol
 
The article discusses the powers and guidelines for being an AG in Texas. You just didn't read it.

id did read and like other posters (us) we even pointed out the parts your obviously didn't read or ignored LMAO
seriously why do you think making stuff up will work

let US know when you are ready to back up your claims with facts otherwise you are guessing at best and per the history of other AGs you are probably wrong

we'll be waiting
 
id did read and like other posters (us) we even pointed out the parts your obviously didn't read or ignored LMAO
seriously why do you think making stuff up will work

let US know when you are ready to back up your claims with facts otherwise you are guessing at best and per the history of other AGs you are probably wrong

we'll be waiting

You got it Mr. PC group thinker. ;)

Actually you don't and never will.
 
1.)You got it Mr. PC group thinker. ;)
2.)Actually you don't and never will.
1.) nope the group posted thier own thoughts and asked you the same questions and pointed out the same things that make your posts fail and wrong
2.) correct i got nothing because YOU never provided anythig factual or that you could support

and yes i agree i never will because like we thought, you never will do this



STate law
State constitution
Texas AG oath

and then use that to prove that he would be FACTUALLY not doing his job if he choose to personally not defend a law in court

let us know when you can :)
we'll be waiting
 
4. Well here's a good one: The Bible clearly states a man should not lay down with another man(or woman) so if I am forced to participate them I'll be forced to be party to a sin I'd rather not be forced to be involved in(while we're on the subject of rights). Now if you liberal guys could have God inspire a rewrite of the Bible I'm in.
5. if the law read I can't refuse service to anyone due to my religious beliefs for any reason then your reasoning might have teeth. Since swords cut both ways how well would it go over at Slick Willees BBQ if the neo-nazis were throwing a party for the clan and the offended race could not decline the job, just saying.

Oh my god, they're going to force you to have gay sex? That's horrible!

Membership in the KKK is not a protected classification and would not be subject to the anti-discrimination laws. You can't kick someone out for being white, but you can kick them out for wearing the white hood.
 
God's Wrath on Unrighteousness

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,[a] in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.

24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.

26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. 29 They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.

That's all rather ironic because in terms of God's wrath in regards to extreme heat waves, hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, and droughts, Texas has lead the nation for quite some time. Yall have obviously been really pissing off the Almighty for a decades.
 
Who's not equal? No one can marry someone of the same sex heterosexual or otherwise. That sounds pretty equal.

How bout we make it instead that no one can marry the *opposite sex* for the next 200 years, then see you not at all blow a gasket over this equality.
 
That's all rather ironic because in terms of God's wrath in regards to extreme heat waves, hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, and droughts, Texas has lead the nation for quite some time. Yall have obviously been really pissing off the Almighty for a decades.

Uhh, because of the gays, duh!
 
Well she's been ragging on him to quit defending this but, he's been working on the case. [and he has lawyer from his office at trial]

Maybe next time we should hire a litigator and not an administrator. Someone like Kansas' AG that litigates cases. Not a career politician.
 
Maybe next time we should hire a litigator and not an administrator. Someone like Kansas' AG that litigates cases. Not a career politician.

The legal case for a same-sex marriage ban is essentially impossible to make at this point, so that really wouldn't help. Such bans simply don't meet the test required to pass an equal protection challenge. (particularly since the Windsor case appears to indicate heightened scrutiny)
 
The legal case for a same-sex marriage ban is essentially impossible to make at this point, so that really wouldn't help. Such bans simply don't meet the test required to pass an equal protection challenge. (particularly since the Windsor case appears to indicate heightened scrutiny)

correct this is why they are going down one by one :)

very soon they may all fall at once
 
correct this is why they are going down one by one :)

very soon they may all fall at once

Utah or Virginia. Please be Utah or Virginia's case!
 
Utah or Virginia. Please be Utah or Virginia's case!

lol nothing yet but it seems we cant go a week without news on this front
 
lol nothing yet but it seems we cant go a week without news on this front

Utah's case goes to the appeals court in April, making it essentially impossible to reach SCOTUS this session. Next session will start in October, through July of 2015. There's just too many cases now to ignore, I'm thinking that will be the session that ends this.
 
That's all rather ironic because in terms of God's wrath in regards to extreme heat waves, hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, and droughts, Texas has lead the nation for quite some time. Yall have obviously been really pissing off the Almighty for a decades.

We'd only have to look as far as California to say the same. Being the political climate is reversed from Texas....explain that.
 
1.) nope the group posted thier own thoughts and asked you the same questions and pointed out the same things that make your posts fail and wrong
2.) correct i got nothing because YOU never provided anythig factual or that you could support

and yes i agree i never will because like we thought, you never will do this



STate law
State constitution
Texas AG oath

and then use that to prove that he would be FACTUALLY not doing his job if he choose to personally not defend a law in court

let us know when you can :)
we'll be waiting

I suppose you and one other person makes a 'group'
:roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom