• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI: Men tried to buy bombs for government attack

You are asking the man to quote himself?

Maybe you didn't quite get the point.

These militias are being called 'right wing', by at least two posters, and the question has been raised as to why 'right wing'? Why? Do you know or are you just knee jerking?

The purpose of calling any person or group 'right wing' is to propagandize people, and it obviously works. Thus anything bad is called 'right wing', or 'extreme right wing' (they really are interchangeable) while left wing carries little such negative baggage, despite its horrific history.

To the propagandized left there is no 'middle', nor is there any 'extreme left wing'. There are just the left, which is good and the right, which is bad.

This is a glimpse into the world Orwell warned us of.

What a load of horse****. They're "right-wing" because they're expressly antigovernment. But keep on with the typical Conservative Persecution Complex.
 
What a load of horse****. They're "right-wing" because they're expressly antigovernment. But keep on with the typical Conservative Persecution Complex.

Are the New Black Panthers "right wing" whatever that is, also?
 
What a load of horse****. They're "right-wing" because they're expressly antigovernment. But keep on with the typical Conservative Persecution Complex.

What a great demonstration of leftist debating skills! You've been carefully taught.
 
Are the New Black Panthers "right wing" whatever that is, also?

He may not have been told yet so it may take time for an answer.

I suppose the Weatherman and Bill Ayers (the university professor and close friend of BHO) were "right wing" as well. So were the Students for a Democratic America, Symbionese Liberation Army, etc.

Low Info Voters are doing America a lot of harm.
 
Nah, I wouldn't wish a murder on you for whatever reason. I'd call the cops and hope that they stop it. And whoever tries to kill another, due to delusions of a person taking away his rights, belongs in a mental hospital, inside a prison, for life. He can then delude himself into believing that the prison guards and men in white coats took away his rights and should all be killed, in between his hourly doses of thorazine.

So who should of been incarcerated first? Washington? Jefferson? Franklin? Hamilton? Payne?
 
Feels like DVSentinel.

Because I said I would support, under certain conditions, a revolution against the left? Perhaps you should familiarize your self with the difference between supporting something and doing something. I never said I would personally kill anyone and I also set conditions on those whom I would support.
 
Because I said I would support, under certain conditions, a revolution against the left? Perhaps you should familiarize your self with the difference between supporting something and doing something. I never said I would personally kill anyone and I also set conditions on those whom I would support.

What is your obsession with the left?

It's just ****ing weird, dude. I mean, it'd be almost as dumb to say "I support revolution against any government personally dislike" but at least it wouldn't seem so ridiculously ideological. But is that what you think? You should just kill whoever you don't like? Because saying you'd support a revolution (implying killing) against leftists (who you clearly dislike) means the same thing. Do you not get that, or do you just think other people don't get it?

I'm just hear to tell you, as a real person, your position is both laughable and laughably transparent.
 
What is your obsession with the left?

It's just ****ing weird, dude. I mean, it'd be almost as dumb to say "I support revolution against any government personally dislike" but at least it wouldn't seem so ridiculously ideological. But is that what you think? You should just kill whoever you don't like? Because saying you'd support a revolution (implying killing) against leftists (who you clearly dislike) means the same thing. Do you not get that, or do you just think other people don't get it?

I'm just hear to tell you, as a real person, your position is both laughable and laughably transparent.

The left is diametrically opposed to my political/personal views.

It would be a bit silly to support a revolution against a government you liked, wouldn't it? I also never said anything about a revolution against the government. That is another reason for saying, left, socialist, liberal, etc.

Funny that your against people supporting a revolution against a government they don't like when that is exactly what the founding fathers of this country did. And socialsim/liberalism/etc sure as hell was not the vision they had for this country.
 
So who should of been incarcerated first? Washington? Jefferson? Franklin? Hamilton? Payne?

Stop attempting to turn this around on me. I never advocated murdering those who I think may be antiamerican. YOU did.
 
Are the New Black Panthers "right wing" whatever that is, also?

Ah, the New Black Panthers. When did they try to buy bombs from the FBI?
 
Ah, the New Black Panthers. When did they try to buy bombs from the FBI?

Is that your criteria between 'left wing' and 'right wing', or the standard groups are held to before they're considered to be a 'militia'?
 
The left is diametrically opposed to my political/personal views.

It would be a bit silly to support a revolution against a government you liked, wouldn't it? I also never said anything about a revolution against the government. That is another reason for saying, left, socialist, liberal, etc.

Funny that your against people supporting a revolution against a government they don't like when that is exactly what the founding fathers of this country did. And socialsim/liberalism/etc sure as hell was not the vision they had for this country.

This is entirely nonsense. Grow up. Talking about killing people that you disagree with and how it's okay because you don't like them? Stop.
 
Hahahahaha

What you are failing to understand is that when a military member kills an enemy combatant, it is not MURDER, even if they are enemies during a revolution. Hence, Rebels and Blue Bellies were not committing murder during combat. There are very strict rules on who can be considered a combatant and who can not. Al Queda and the Taliban are terrorist because they fail to meet the standards of combatants.

Our erstwhile friends who got arrested in the OP would also not qualify. For me to support a revolution, there would have to be qualification as combatants.

However, just because they do not meet the standard to be combatants, they can still be carrying out revolution. You discount the possibility of revolution, even when the OP gives proof that such actions and thought are in existence.
 
Back
Top Bottom