Re: Dunn convicted of attempted murder; hung jury on murder in 'loud-music' trial
If it smells like a murder, looks like a murder and sounds like a murder it most often is a murder.
Unfortunately it doesn't look that way to others.
And some of those were on the jury.
It obviously wasn't a slam dunk as someone said
(at least not to the Jurors, the ones who actually count), nor does there have corroborating evidence as another has indicated the lack of.
The prosecution has to prove their case. Period. The defense does not have to.
And with the circumstantial evidence that what Dunn saw may have been stashed, and the highly suspicious activity of the driver contacting his aunt and her later coming into the area, that circumstantial evidence has some clout.
As such, it is very understandable that he wasn't convicted of such, the prosecution did not prove it to all the jurors.
this is what you still don't understand.
Murder 1 was for davis.
the other 3 attempted murders were for the 3 boys in the car that were of no threat to dunn.
the discharge of a gun into a occupied vehicle was for the 3 boys that were no threat to dunn.
they are all independent charges and they will stand as guilty even if the murder charge doesn't go through. you cannot just randomly shoot at innocent people and not be held responsible. more so when those innocent people are driving away.
No ludin. :naughty
That is what you do not understand.
Nor do you understand that he was not shooting at them, but at the perceived threat, who was Davis.
He can not be held accountable if he is found not guilty and/or later granted immunity.
The law can not say, you can fire at an immanent threat, but be held accountable for any other unintentional damage caused by you defending yourself. It does not say that.
The immunity is complete. It covers any criminal action arising from your use of that justified force.
So learn the law before speaking about it.
