• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

‘Knock That White Boy Out’: Arrests Made After Mob Of Teens Attack Disabled Vet

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's no such thing as black racism. The term is used by racists to imply that bigotry by blacks is the same as bigotry by whites. Given power dynamics, that is clearly not the case. The term 'black racism' is nothing more than a false equivalence employed by racists in attempt to claim that common bigots are as detrimental to society as organized actual (institutionally backed) racism.

Institutionally backed racism such as racial quotas in employment and even university admissions?
 
There's no such thing as black racism. The term is used by racists to imply that bigotry by blacks is the same as bigotry by whites. Given power dynamics, that is clearly not the case. The term 'black racism' is nothing more than a false equivalence employed by racists in attempt to claim that common bigots are as detrimental to society as organized actual (institutionally backed) racism.

Ah. yes. "Power Dynamics" means Black people can never be racist. Even to Hispanics?
 
Ah. yes. "Power Dynamics" means Black people can never be racist. Even to Hispanics?

He should talk to some of the Korean shop owners in South Central L.A. while he's at it.
 
Institutionally backed racism such as racial quotas in employment and even university admissions?

It's not racism. It's 'power dynamics'.

That's a Liberal term meaning Blacks are permitted to treat Whites differently (and others I presume) without complaint. It's their plan to bring the country together.
 
Actually, it is part and parcel among apologists to create such a template whereby two races are treated very differently.

Differentiating between the majority and minority, sociologically, is hardly "treating races different".

And I'll tell you something else that maybe you should consider. The term is meant to piss people off. It's no different than the claims of "Jewish Nazism" going on over there in Palestine. You don't like that, do you? Sure, when Jews are made out to be the monster, Gard's panties get all bunched. But when blacks are made out to be the monster beneath which they suffered then you have no ****ing problem with it.

You better rethink that.
 
Last edited:
.
.
.
Second thing is even in this local report the word "hate crime" never comes up. Go figure.
.
.

It is only a hate crime if the reason for the attack was race. I think the reason for this attack was robbery. I would think that this group of thugs has attacked others in the past and I suspect vulnerability is a bigger factor in the choice of victims than race.
 
Differentiating between the majority and minority is hardly "treating races different".

And I'll tell you something else that maybe you should consider. The term is meant to piss people off. It's no different than the claims of "Jewish Nazism" going on over there in Palestine. You don't like that, do you? Sure, when Jews are made out to be the monster, Gard's panties get all bunched. But when blacks are made out to be the monster beneath which they suffered then you have no ****ing problem with it.

You better rethink that.

It isn't differentiating, it is the institutionalized implementation of various memes intended to promote double standards and excuse behavior that should be inexcusable.

As far as Jewish people are concerned, I have never denied that there are Jewish racists, especially in Israel in their settler population. They are loathsome individuals. If I ever get to the point where I need to deny this in order to retain true to political correctness of some sort much as is what is happening in this thread regarding the issue at hand, do me a solid and remind me, k?

oh, and one more thing. Do try to keep in mind who is the majority and who is the minority vis a vis Arabs and Jews, k?
 
Last edited:
It isn't differentiating, it is the institutionalized implementation of various memes intended to promote double standards and excuse behavior that should be inexcusable.

No, it's sociology. The majority with power discriminating is not the same as some nobody pissing in the wind. Racism requires institutional backing, otherwise it's just common bigotry. I'm sorry if sociology scares you or is beyond your interests, but those are facts and they should be within your grasp.

As far as Jewish people are concerned, I have never denied that there are Jewish racists, especially in Israel in their settler population. They are loathsome individuals. If I ever get to the point where I need to deny this in order to retain true to political correctness of some sort much as is what is happening in this thread regarding the issue at hand, do me a solid and remind me, k?

Jewish Nazism, not Jewish racism.

Calling a Jew a Nazi is just like calling a black a racist. You are calling them the monster beneath which they suffered. You have a BIG problem with it when it comes to Jews, but you throw blacks under the bus.
 
Differentiating between the majority and minority, sociologically, is hardly "treating races different".

And I'll tell you something else that maybe you should consider. The term is meant to piss people off. It's no different than the claims of "Jewish Nazism" going on over there in Palestine. You don't like that, do you? Sure, when Jews are made out to be the monster, Gard's panties get all bunched. But when blacks are made out to be the monster beneath which they suffered then you have no ****ing problem with it.

You better rethink that.

I did rethink it and came up with the idea that everyone should be treated equally, all having equal respect and rights, and that we should all be judged on the content of our character rather than the color of our skin.
 
There's no such thing as black racism

Sure there is.

Racism | Define Racism at Dictionary.com

rac·ism [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA
noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

Black people can do that just as white people can. Just because you want to insert power dynamics into the definition doesn't mean it's actually in the definition.
 
I did rethink it and came up with the idea that everyone should be treated equally, all having equal respect and rights, and that we should all be judged on the content of our character rather than the color of our skin.

And so you choose to ignore history, sociology and common sense. That's great!
 
My opinion .... black racism is rearing its ugly head and its no coincidence that Barak Obama & Eric Holder are in charge during a period of time when hundreds of incidents all over the country have blacks abusing whites, fact is they support it and see it as social justice for past crimes by whites many years ago. You can see the bias from this authoritarian regime in the white cop & black professor incident where Obama backed the black skinned person as well as Zimmerman case where he backed the black person as well. Dont forget Obama went to Reverand Wrights racist black church as well. It is also my opinion that this tanning tax has racism written all over it as well as we all know that it is only white people who tan. I would be willing to bet that Obama thought long & hard about some kind of tax where he could just tax whitey & this is what he came up with. Why else would you tax tanning beds? ridiculous

Black racists feel emboldened by this presidents behavior and thats at least one of the reasons why you see so much Black on white crime during this regimes rule.

Translation: I can't deal with a black president due to my own racism, so as a defense mechanism I have to accuse Obama of being a racist to justify my own racist beliefs.
 
Black people can do that just as white people can.

No, they cannot. Because there's no power behind it and there never has been. Where there is no threat of unjust discrimination, there is no racism.
 
No, they cannot. Because there's no power behind it and there never has been. Where there is no threat of unjust discrimination, there is no racism.

Okay, that's not the definition of racism. Which I posted.

Words have meaning.
 
Sure there is.

Racism | Define Racism at Dictionary.com



Black people can do that just as white people can. Just because you want to insert power dynamics into the definition doesn't mean it's actually in the definition.

There's different degrees of racism.

Whites are 63% percent of the population. Blacks are 13% of the population. Thus, because of that, white racism is rightfully considered much worse. Not to mention black racism in general is usually based on them complaining about whites being racist towards them (which sometimes is justified complaints, and sometimes not). White racism is usually white people claiming to be superior to blacks, calling them dumb, prone to violence, etc.
 
And words have more meaning when one is educated.

No, the word "sky" doesn't mean something new when you go to graduate school. Blacks can be racist. So can whites. It's right there in the definition of the word.
 
No, it's sociology. The majority with power discriminating is not the same as some nobody pissing in the wind. Racism requires institutional backing, otherwise it's just common bigotry. I'm sorry if sociology scares you or is beyond your interests, but those are facts and they should be within your grasp.



.

So, how is it NOT institutionalized backing when people intentionally limit their application in such a way as to favor one race over another? I am older than you and was studying sociology when there was a concerted effort by interested parties to define racism in exactly the way as you now simply accept as gospel. Their having succeeded to the point where folks like you DO accept it as gospel and implement the double standards only proves how thoroughly the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction since the early sixties.

At the end of the day, reactionary politics are just reactionary politics, however, and implementing a system of black privilege is no different than the previous system of white privilege. Just because you lend yourself to the power structure of this particular system of privilege does not mean it does not exist. It just means that you accept it unquestioningly.
 
There's different degrees of racism.

Whites are 63% percent of the population. Blacks are 13% of the population. Thus, because of that, white racism is rightfully considered much worse. Not to mention black racism in general is usually based on them complaining about whites being racist towards them (which sometimes is justified complaints, and sometimes not). White racism is usually white people claiming to be superior to blacks, calling them dumb, prone to violence, etc.

That's fine, but to say something silly like "blacks can't be racist" or "black racism doesn't exist" is just dumb.
 
So, how is it NOT institutionalized backing when people intentionally limit their application in such a way as to favor one race over another?

That discrimination is just. It is in the interest of higher learning institutions to foster diversity. Diversity increases the quality of the university, the college experience and thus the product they are selling.
 
I see that the claim that the media somehow ignores black on white hate crimes is being ignored (you know, the issue raised in the OP) in favor of eco's wacky "blacks can't be racist" because the former is harder to defend while the latter is easier to attack and reinforces the feeling of oppression that many whites feel.
 
That discrimination is just. It is in the interest of higher learning institutions to foster diversity. Diversity increases the quality of the university, the college experience and thus the product they are selling.

Whether or not it's just has nothing to do with whether it's racially motivated discrimination.

You seem to have just decided racism means something that it does not. You've added power dynamics to it (that's not in the definition) and now justice (that's not in the definition). The word has meaning. You can't run from that lol
 
No, the word "sky" doesn't mean something new when you go to graduate school. Blacks can be racist. So can whites. It's right there in the definition of the word.

Is it too difficult for you to read all the way down to the "2." in your definition? That 2. makes it clear that blacks are incapable of racism via being incapable of unjust institutionalized discrimination.

2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.


If you're gonna post the dictionary, at least read it.
 
Is it too difficult for you to read all the way down to the "2." in your definition? That 2. makes it clear that blacks are incapable of racism via being incapable of unjust institutionalized discrimination.

lol not it doesn't, unless you think 1- that that's the only definition (odd, since you yourself recognize it's number 2) or that black people are incapable of creating policies.

lol blacks can't be racist.tumblr_lu419rDeQl1r0w390.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom