• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rainbow Flag Will Fly Over Montreal City Hall During Olympics

APACHERAT said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there's freedom of speech in Russia.
Click to expand...

aww sorry was going with more of a unalienable( but totally alienable hence the problem) Rights vibe I beg your pardon
 
winston53660 said:
Not if one is talking about homosexuality.
Click to expand...

I wonder if gay jokes are illegal in Russia ?

Gay jokes are now against regulations in the U.S. military.

First they went after the interservice rivalry jokes.
Then they went after the ethnic jokes.
Next was the jokes about girls.
Soon sex jokes were no longer were able to be told.
All that was left were gay jokes and Obama jokes.
With repealing DADT, gay jokes went off base.
All that was left was Obama jokes and guess what happened ?
 
APACHERAT said:
I wonder if gay jokes are illegal in Russia ?

Gay jokes are now against regulations in the U.S. military.

First they went after the interservice rivalry jokes.
Then they went after the ethnic jokes.
Next was the jokes about girls.
Soon sex jokes were no longer were able to be told.
All that was left were gay jokes and Obama jokes.
With repealing DADT, gay jokes went off base.
All that was left was Obama jokes and guess what happened ?
Click to expand...


Goal posts switched.
 
AGENT J said:
you mean like cowboys, people that ride harleys and many 80s rock bands like van halen?

View attachment 67161693


thats crazy how "****ed up, desperate and unnormal" all those people are LMAO
Click to expand...
Sure...them too. Nothing screams "I am comfortable with who I am" more clearly than "LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME HOLY **** LOOK AT ME AND SEE HOW "NORMAL" I AM!!!" :roll: and really...you want to use DLR as your standard of 'normal...and NOT some insecure self absorbed attention whore?

BUT...I want to stress...I DO support your RIGHT to do whatever the **** you want to do, J. With whoever you want to do it with. Let your freak flag fly.
 
Last edited:
blarg said:
ok but can we give all of them and us the option of marge to some 1 of the same gender in the mean time and moral support when it comes to having the same freedoms that we enjoy
Click to expand...
Im all for giving 'them' the same love and moral support I give everyone. I dont have to agree with their choices or even support gay marriage to do so.
 
VanceMack said:
1.)Sure...them too. Nothing screams "I am comfortable with who I am" more clearly than "LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME HOLY **** LOOK AT ME AND SEE HOW "NORMAL" I AM!!!" :roll:
2.) and really...you want to use DLR as your standard of 'normal...and NOT some insecure self absorbed attention whore?
3.)BUT...I want to stress...I DO support your RIGHT to do whatever the **** you want to do, J. With whoever you want to do it with. Let your freak flag fly.
Click to expand...

1.) id have to agree, takes a whole lot of confidence to do that, you wouldnt see my cheesy butt on stage and on tv in front of millions LMAO, yes definitely comfortable.
2.) nope, just pointing out that the subjective, worthless, meaningless and failed "logic", singling out gays is a farce. These types of manufactured, strawman and hypocritical issues are mentally retard, dishonest and make no intellectual sense what so ever, its transparent and pure entertainment to honest, educated and objective people.
3.) thanks for your support but currently my rights arent being infringed on but my fellow americans are, most americans care about that . . . . .but there are some that are bigoted and or support discrimination and they dont, i know im one of the ones that do care and it makes me proud :)
 
Last edited:
VanceMack said:
Im all for giving 'them' the same love and moral support I give everyone. I dont have to agree with their choices or even support gay marriage to do so.
Click to expand...

if you dont support equal rights theres no love that is being given :shrug:
 
AGENT J said:
if you dont support equal rights theres no love that is being given :shrug:
Click to expand...
Sorry...it doesnt work that way. But I DO support you doing whatever you want with whomever you want J. Your business.
 
AGENT J said:
1.) id have to agree, takes a whole lot of confidence to do that, you wouldnt see my cheesy butt on stage and on tv in front of millions LMAO, yes definitely comfortable.
2.) nope, just pointing out that the subjective, worthless, meaningless and failed "logic", singling out gays is a farce. These types of manufactured, strawman and hypocritical issues are mentally retard, dishonest and make no intellectual sense what so ever, its transparent and pure entertainment to honest, educated and objective people.
3.) thanks for your support but currently my rights arent being infringed on but my fellow americans are, most americans care about that . . . . .but there are some that are bigoted and or support discrimination and they dont, i know im one of the ones that do care and it makes me proud :)
Click to expand...
Yes...THATS what they exude...CONFIDENCE. And thats why they have NO identity concerns. :roll:
 
VanceMack said:
1.)Sorry...it doesnt work that way.
2.)But I DO support you doing whatever you want with whomever you want J. Your business.
Click to expand...

1.)Yes it works that way LMAO
its a hard sell to violate peoples rights and make them a lesser and then claim love

reminds me off the abusive husband that tells his wife he beats her up because he loves her so much, nobody buys that, but it is very funny that you think somebody would.

2.) you already proved this false, if i was gay this would not be true, you are being dishonest lol

if you dont support equal rights for gays thats not love for them
 
VanceMack said:
1.)Yes...THATS what they exude...CONFIDENCE.
2.) And thats why they have NO identity concerns. :roll:
Click to expand...
1.) yes, they do
2.) nope they dont, some do:shrug: just like everybody

so role your eyes as much as you wan,t facts win again over your inane illogical sterotypes lol
 
AGENT J said:
you mean like cowboys, people that ride harleys and many 80s rock bands like van halen?

View attachment 67161693


thats crazy how "****ed up, desperate and unnormal" all those people are LMAO
Click to expand...

I'm not sure the comparison of a rockstar in a performance situation is really equatable to the attendees at a pride festival. performer=/=attendee. Also, cowboys and people wearing harleys are usually wearing clothing underneath them, in general situations. The situation he is talking about is men wearing them as a lone piece of atire, possibly with something like a thong.

In fact, you're better off pointing out that it's an adult environment where people are partying and those engaging in such things are doing so on a limited basis and not representative of the whole.
 
APACHERAT said:
Neither does having some getting their panties all knotted up over that foreign activist can't enter a sovereign nation and break its laws by advocating a lifestyle that just happens to be legal in that country.

It makes no sense.

It's your usual agitators causing problems.

Smoking tobaco is still legal in America but activist aren't allowed to advertise cigarettes on television, in print or on billboards. Do you see smokers getting their panties all knotted up ?
Click to expand...


political and commercial speech have always been regulated differently, for rather obvious reasons
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
1.)I'm not sure the comparison of a rockstar in a performance situation is really equatable to the attendees at a pride festival. performer=/=attendee. Also, cowboys and people wearing harleys are usually wearing clothing underneath them, in general situations. The situation he is talking about is men wearing them as a lone piece of atire, possibly with something like a thong.

2.)In fact, you're better off pointing out that it's an adult environment where people are partying and those engaging in such things are doing so on a limited basis and not representative of the whole.
Click to expand...

1.) oh brother here we go again with you not having a clue what is actually being talking about and you getting it wrong

point 1 was, ALL CHAPS are assless, thats one of the things that makes them chaps, referring to chaps as assless or a gay thing was stupid
point 2 was, STRAIGHT people also have worn chaps with thier naked asses exposed as the pic i provided
if better examples of all types of people being lude then we can simply spring break, concerts, mardi gras, performers, college parties etc etc

but thank you for clearlign that up

2.) yes in MOST cases this is true but not always but my point was the strawman failed anyway because subjective lude acts are not solely conducted by "gays" and saying assless chaps is like saying crotchless shoes, its redundant
 
APACHERAT said:
As part of this defense of “Christian values,” Russia has adopted a law banning “homosexual propaganda” and another that makes it a criminal offense to “insult” the religious sensibilities of believers.
Click to expand...

Do you support these laws, Apache?
 
Kobie said:
Do you support these laws, Apache?
Click to expand...

thankfully thats not my country but the most scary part about those laws are these parts

"homosexual propaganda”
“insult” the religious sensibilities

who determines what the propaganda is and how
who determines what the an insult is and how
who determines what sensibilities are and how

seems to me they can just make it up
 
AGENT J said:
point 2 was, STRAIGHT people also have worn chaps with thier naked asses exposed as the pic i provided
if better examples of all types of people being lude then we can simply spring break, concerts, mardi gras, performers, college parties etc etc
Click to expand...

Then you made your point poorly citing a rockstar and comparing it to general attendees

2.) yes in MOST cases this is true but not always but my point was the strawman failed anyway because subjective lude acts are not solely conducted by "gays" and saying assless chaps is like saying crotchless shoes, its redundant
Click to expand...

well, like others have pointed out, and you will likely continue to ignore, assless chaps usually refers to a style. You know, wearing them with nothing or next to nothing underneath
 
AGENT J said:
thankfully thats not my country but the most scary part about those laws are these parts

"homosexual propaganda”
“insult” the religious sensibilities

who determines what the propaganda is and how
who determines what the an insult is and how
who determines what sensibilities are and how

seems to me they can just make it up
Click to expand...

I'm curious to see if Apache thinks these laws are good.
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
1.)Then you made your point poorly citing a rockstar and comparing it to general attendees

2.)well, like others have pointed out, and you will likely continue to ignore, assless chaps usually refers to a style. You know, wearing them with nothing or next to nothing underneath
Click to expand...

1.) odd the person i was talking to and people in the conversation got it just find, thanks for your meaningless opinion though its entertaining as always :)
2.) you mean like the picture i provided? LMAO and it wanst not ignored at all, had a whole discussion on it, and it was pointed out its all wrong and redundant. Thanks again
 
Kobie said:
I'm curious to see if Apache thinks these laws are good.
Click to expand...

will be interesting but i bet the question will be dodged or a deflection failed attempt at humor or attempt to upset answer will be given.
 
Last edited:
AGENT J said:
1.) odd the person i was talking to and people in the conversation got it just find
Click to expand...

a bunch of people accepting a faulty argument doesn't make it valid.


2.) you mean like the picture i provided?
Click to expand...

yes, what about it?
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
a bunch of people accepting a faulty argument doesn't make it valid.
2.) yes, what about it?
Click to expand...

1.) you thinking your opinion matters doesn't make it valid either LOL and since your argument was it was poor but the people in the conversion understood it that makes your opinion even more useless, but this is typical and the MO of your posts
2.) it meant thanks for your explanation captain obvious

is there something accurate, relevant or even on topic that matters that youd like to discuss or are you simply going to continue to make posts trying to salvage the fact you guessed wrong and your post failed again? cause no one cares lol
 
AGENT J said:
1.) you thinking your opinion matters doesn't make it valid either LOL and since your argument was it was poor but the people in the conversion understood it that makes your opinion even more useless, but this is typical and the MO of your posts
Click to expand...

You're appealing to popularity here and ignoring the fact that your argument was dependent on comparing two unlike things.

2.) it meant thanks for your explanation captain obvious
Click to expand...

you're really not making sense
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
1.)You're appealing to popularity here and ignoring the fact that your argument was dependent on comparing two unlike things.
2.)you're really not making sense
Click to expand...

1.) again your opinion (NOT FACT) is meaningless, as usual your post is not about the actual discussion as explained in post 365 where you were shown to be factually wrong. My example was fine for what "I" was talking about lol

2.) Im sure you feel this way thats what happens when you jump in and get wrong

again your mistake and failed post cant be saved, now do you have something relevant, accurate and on topic?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom