• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled[W:121]

Re: Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled

yep thats what makes the OP and the later provided PDF complete junk

I don't think pot will nation wide legality until they develop a roadside spot test for influence.
 
Re: Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled

I don't think pot will nation wide legality until they develop a roadside spot test for influence.

They already do.

All the cop has to do is throw Doritos all over the road, if the driver goes down to eat them, ****ing torched.
 
Re: Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled

I don't think pot will nation wide legality until they develop a roadside spot test for influence.


hmmm

very possible but im not sure that will have an impact unless evidence is produced that its needed to push that issue

i mean theres already not "roadside" test for many many drugs legal and illegal

Im all for people NOT driving under the influence i just dont know if this is going to matter unless something makes it
 
What a surprise-Rocketman:lol:

SEATTLE (CBS Seattle) – According to a recent study, fatal car crashes involving pot use have tripled in the U.S.
“Currently, one of nine drivers involved in fatal crashes would test positive for marijuana,” Dr. Guohua Li, director of the Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention at Columbia, and co-author of the study told HealthDay News.
.
Researchers from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health gathered data from six states – California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and West Virginia – that perform toxicology tests on drivers involved in fatal car accidents. This data included over 23,500 drivers that died within one hour of a crash between 1999 and 2010.
Li reported in the study that alcohol contributed to about 40 percent of traffic fatalities throughout the decade.

The researchers found that drugs played an increasing role in fatal traffic accidents. Drugged driving accounted for more than 28 percent of traffic deaths in 2010, which is 16 percent more than it was in 1999.
The researchers also found that marijuana was the main drug involved in the increase. It contributed to 12 percent of fatal crashes, compared to only 4 percent in 1999.

“If a driver is under the influence of alcohol, their risk of a fatal crash is 13 times higher than the risk of the driver who is not under the influence of alcohol,” Li said. “But if the driver is under the influence of both alcohol and marijuana, their risk increased to 24 times that of a sober person.”
Researchers found that the increase in marijuana use occurred across all ages for males and females.
Jonathan Adkins, deputy executive director of the Governors Highway Safety Association, told HealthDay News that marijuana impairs driving in much the same way that alcohol does.

“This study shows an alarming increase in driving under the influence of drugs, and, in particular, it shows an increase in driving under the influence of both alcohol and drugs,” Jan Withers, national president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, added.
“MADD is concerned anytime we hear about an increase in impaired driving, since it’s 100 percent preventable,” Withers said. “When it comes to drugged driving versus drunk driving, the substances may be different but the consequences are the same – needless deaths and injuries.”
Adkins noted that the legalization of marijuana in some states makes these findings important to traffic safety officials.

“It’s a wake-up call for us in highway safety,” Adkins added. “The legalization of pot is going to spread to other states. It’s not even a partisan issue at this point. Our expectation is this will become the norm rather than the rarity.”
Li added that police do not have a test as accurate as the Breathalyzer to check a driver’s marijuana intoxication level.

Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled « CBS Seattle

Is there a correlated increase in vehicular accidents? Also is the test good enough to determine marijuana was the contributing factor or just a trace amount?
 
Re: Study: Fatal Car Crashes Involving Marijuana Have Tripled

I thought pot smokers were supposed to be the stupid ones? This article is so blatantly deceptive you can discern what is wrong with it simply by skimming through it.

"Subjects with detectable amounts of marijuana (it can stay in your system up to 45 days after ingesting) in their systems after a fatal accident have tripled from 4% to 12% from 1999 to 2010" would be more accurate. I doubt its a mistake this article just happens to coincide with recent legalization. :roll:

Keep in mind also the tests that are given in 2010 would be more likely to have a positive than in 1999 due to increased test sensitivity.
 
Colorado Law Enforcement Drug Recognition Experts (DREs)

• Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) are law enforcement officers who are highly trained to recognize
impairment in drivers under the influence of drugs, and to identify which category of drug is causing
the impairment.
• The number of certified DREs has risen from 86 in 2005 to 173 as of July 1, 2011. There are expected to
be over 190 DREs statewide by the end of 2011.
• From 2005 to 2010, the number of evaluations conducted by DREs each year has nearly doubled, from
465 (2005) to 910 (2010).
o 2005 – 465
o 2006 – 511
o 2007 – 668
o 2008 – 729
o 2009 – 810
o 2010 -- 910
• On average, between 2005 and 2010, roughly 58% of all DRE evaluations came up with a result of
marijuana as a drug involved.
• From 2009 (391) to 2010 (599), there was a 35% increase in the number of DRE evaluation that came
up with a result of marijuana as a drug involved.
o 2005 – 300
o 2006 – 304
o 2007 – 335
o 2008—429
o 2009 – 391
o 2010 - 599

http://www.coloradodot.info/program...ving/assets/DruggedDrivingFactSheet082011.pdf


Let me see . . .

year % of evaluations determined to be THC


  • 2005 64.5%
  • 2006 59.5%
  • 2007 50.1%
  • 2008 58.8%
  • 2009 48.3%
  • 2010 65.8%

    I do not know what happened to make the spike at 2010 but I suspect that it was an emphasis on focusing on marijuana due to the legalization. These statistics are nearly worthless since we do not have info confirming this with a test that positively determines if a subject is under the influence by THC.
 
Back
Top Bottom