• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Holder: Feds recognize Utah’s same-sex marriages[W:50]

I don't live in a warped world - I live in a Democratic Republic and Constitutional United States - where representatives of the people vote for the people AND OR when direct democracy is a ballot initiative. This is not the land of non-democratically elected officials making public policy or a non-democratically elected judicial system ruling on democracy or overruling a democratic vote...

Hell, using your logic anarchy is "more free" so what's wrong with that?

Come to me with a real argument instead of stunted logic....

You obviously don't understand why we have something called a "Constitution". If you did, you would understand why the dribble you just posted doesn't hold water.
 
1.)I don't live in a warped world - I live in a Democratic Republic and Constitutional United States - where representatives of the people vote for the people AND OR when direct democracy is a ballot initiative. This is not the land of non-democratically elected officials making public policy or a non-democratically elected judicial system ruling on democracy or overruling a democratic vote...

2.)Hell, using your logic anarchy is "more free" so what's wrong with that?

3.)Come to me with a real argument instead of stunted logic....

1.)if you did youd see this is factually an equal rights issue, your own words prove you wrong
you dont get to vote others rights away, facts simply prove you wrong

2.) theres that failed laughable buzz word again, "anarchy" anarchy is actually what was stopped by this

3.) this further proves why your post fails, its not an ARGUMENT, this is factually an equal rights issue
 
You want anarchy....

Our Bill of Rights AND Constitution draw that line. Too bad our constitution is no longer controlled by the congress but rather regulated by the courts.

Also, the Ninth Amendment deals with indentured servitudes - not gays.

The best part about the Ninth is that the Ninth only includes amendments 1-8....

An Amendment cannot pertain directly to a future Amendment.

There are procedures to deal with issues such as this as (usually) addendums or repeals.

all these documents and amendments you quote prove your post wrong wrong and others right
 
Yes, our federal government cannot circumvent the constitution - which it has been doing and been making a habit of doing in an attempt of progress (meaning YOU TOLERATING THEIR TYRANNY DOING SUCH)...

good thin on this issue it is factually not, this strawman argument will never work nobody honest and educated buys it
 
Back
Top Bottom