• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Excon said:
It's a game.
Click to expand...

zero game, just pointing out FACTS backed up by definitions and links and his own words

ill ask you the same questions

simply questions

did he make a comparison between bestiality and homosexuality? yes or no
did he equate homosexuality and bestiality? yes or no


there is zero other written content except for what is present anything else will be an assumption on your part so the questions and answers are easy as there is only one factual way to answer them.
yes or no?
 
AGENT J said:
you made the same mistake the other poster di YOU assumed
Click to expand...
No that was your mistake as it was known what I was speaking about.
You assumed otherwise.




AGENT J said:
FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
Click to expand...
The constant ignoring of the facts makes your postings wrong each and every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
 
apdst said:
The only one hurting A&E is A&E.

GLAAD supporters don't even watch the show! So what if they get mad...lol!
Click to expand...

Whether A & E is damaging A & E, remains to be seen. It is not a stand alone network and the other brands could be damaged.

Yeah, so? That is not the on show on the A & E network.
 
AGENT J said:
there was ZERO semantics in my statement

did he make a comparison between bestiality and homosexuality? yes or no
did he equate homosexuality and bestiality? yes or no
Click to expand...

It is semantically accurate (for the wrong reasons), sure.

No (semantics works both ways).

No (semantics works both ways).
 
Excon said:
No that was your mistake as it was known what I was speaking about.
You assumed otherwise.
]
Click to expand...

link? proof? facts?

"I" made a statement then "YOU" attacked it and called it wrong, "YOU" dont get to determine what "I" was talking about LMAO
both your statments are 1005 false and facts prove that

the only assumption was yours again if you disagree qoute it, point it out, back up your false claim which you can not
 
Excon said:
Wrong, it is a game.

You already have been told he made no such comparison.
Click to expand...

zero game, just pointing out FACTS backed up by definitions and links and his own words


ill ask you the same questions


simply questions


did he make a comparison between bestiality and homosexuality? yes or no
did he equate homosexuality and bestiality? yes or no




there is zero other written content except for what is present anything else will be an assumption on your part so the questions and answers are easy as there is only one factual way to answer them.
yes or no?

he factually made the comparison this fact will never change
 
scatt said:
1.)It is semantically accurate (for the wrong reasons), sure.

2.)No (semantics works both ways).

3.)No (semantics works both ways).
Click to expand...

1.)) facts, definitions, his quotes and links all prove you wrong there was no semantics

2.) see 1#
3.) see 1#

i have facts, links his quote and definitions all proving he factually did make a comparasion between them and he factually did equate them, what FACTS do you have that supports your claim? please post them id love to read it
 
AGENT J said:
link? proof? facts?

"I" made a statement then "YOU" attacked it and called it wrong, "YOU" dont get to determine what "I" was talking about LMAO
both your statments are 1005 false and facts prove that

the only assumption was yours again if you disagree qoute it, point it out, back up your false claim which you can not
Click to expand...
:naughty
You were the one commenting on what I said when you didn't know what I was saying. You assumed and were wrong.


Spare us the crying and game.

It is not needed, and is nothing more than a distraction. And I am sure you know that.
 
Excon said:
:naughty
1.)You were the one commenting on what I said when you didn't know what I was saying. You assumed and were wrong.
2.)Spare us the crying and game.
3.) It is not needed, and is nothing more than a distraction. And I am sure you know that.
Click to expand...

1.) 100% a lie and false, you commented on my statement and i pointed out your statement was factually wrong and it still is. Would you like me to quote you and further prove your post wrong?

heres your qoute talkign to me and referring to my statment and your post as worded is 100% factually wrong
Excon said:
I will take your bait.
Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison.
Click to expand...
facts destroy your post again
2.) no crying as usual facts are winning :shrug:
3.) facts are important and never a distraction no matter how much you deny them

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
AGENT J said:
1.) 100% a lie and false, you commented on my statement and i pointed out your statement was factually wrong and it still is. Would you like me to quote you and further prove your post wrong?
2.) no crying as usual facts are winning
3.) facts are important and never a distraction no matter how much you deny them

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
Click to expand...
:doh
iLOL

Wrong!

:lamo
 
AGENT J said:
1.) 100% a lie and false, you commented on my statement and i pointed out your statement was factually wrong and it still is. Would you like me to quote you and further prove your post wrong?

heres your qoute talkign to me and referring to my statment and your post as worded is 100% factually wrong

facts destroy your post again
2.) no crying as usual facts are winning :shrug:
3.) facts are important and never a distraction no matter how much you deny them

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
Click to expand...
He won't substantiate. He just keeps posting you're wrong over and over again like he responded to my posts earlier this afternoon. It's a game for him...his form of trolling, I imagine.
 
Last edited:
It is over. He will be filmed for more episodes. The A&E ratings grab attempt backfired and they proved that they answer to the dollar, and have no corporate morals regarding "anti-gay" anything.

A&E calls off 'Duck Dynasty' suspension
 
Excon said:
:doh
iLOL

Wrong!

:lamo
Click to expand...
good move backing off the lie you posted

again simply provide any FACTS you have to support your false claims, even ONE will do

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
scatt said:
Definitions are required for semantics to be applied, silly goose.
Click to expand...

correct yet i played no semantics game and this is why you have avoid, dodged and run from providing any facts to back up your claims

AGAIN please post any proof that support your false statments

Fact is a comparison was made and he did equate the two. This fact will never change if you disagree as always simply provide any facts that prove otherwise so far you have posted nothing to this effect.
 
Last edited:
AGENT J said:
correct yet i played no semantics game and this is why you have avoid, dodged and run from providing any facts to back up your claims

AGAIN please post any proof that support your false statments

Fact is a compassion was made and he did equate the two. This fact will never change if you disagree as always simply provide any facts that prove otherwise so far you have posted nothing to this effect.
Click to expand...
A compassion was made? Boy you ain't making any sense.
 
scatt said:
If you mean by not equating them as the same thing but as two things that are grouped irrelevant of him, sure.
Click to expand...

I dont mean anythign im simply goig by facts and the actual defintion of the words

Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as[/SIZE] equal, equivalent, orcomparable[/SIZE]
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins
 
scatt said:
1.)Sins only
2.), no comparison given.
Click to expand...

1.) which was factually a comparison and equation
2.) 100% false and a lie against facts, his quotes, links and the definition of the words all prove you 100% factually wrong

remind me what do you have supporting your argument against facts?
 
Excon said:
He answered about a specific time period.
You saying he made a comparison is a lie.

He made no comparison.
He wasn't asked which was better. He wasn't even asked to make a comparison. He was asked specifically about his experience of the time to which he answered.
Stop being dishonest.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but pre is before. It's a comparison. It's simple communication.
 
Excon said:
And you are wrong.
You have no definitive source that can say any such thing.
Secondly you were asked for the actual clause which you have failed to provide.
Click to expand...

Fox News isn't specific? I'm sorry, but you're just closing your eyes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom