- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Really? Another post devoid of [highlight]the[/highlight] relevant facts?FACTS:
no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof
your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"
PROOF:
Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them
: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins
Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up
Do you really not understand that context and meaning of what was said is everything here?
And that the constant ignoring of that makes your postings wrong each and every time
So again.
Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.