You haven't made reasonable arguments. You have said sodomy is wrong because it doesn't lead to procreation; you then say it's ok to have sex even if you know you won't procreate. Those two things don't go together. If you are against sodomy because it doesn't lead to procreation, you should be against any sex except that done when you have a good reason to think pregnancy will result.
This is actually one of the things very different for humans - unlike other animals that mate only when a female is in heat - and thus likely to get pregnant - humans can mate at any time; we get aroused even outside of being of heat. This is how "nature" has made us, if you want to use that terminology. We are lucky that we can enjoy the closeness and bonding of sex at any time. And that we can "get off" in lots of different ways - whether oral stimulation, by hands, by vibrators, by anal sex, by **** between breasts, by all the other many variations we have dreamed off.
AND we can procreate even if we aren't a male/female pairing due to IVF.
Isn't it an amazing thing where our brains, talents, creativity combined with a nature that allows us to enjoy this at any time, not just when the female is in heat?
And you worry about the gender of the people involved or the type of act? Oh, what a narrow world you must have!
Again - because you have contradicted yourself - "sex is for procreation but yes you can have sex if you know you are infertile" makes your one argument against sodomy is invalid and not rational