• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:465]

I'm sure the court will appreciate the benefit of your insight. You should contact them.:peace

its not my insight im using the courts and how they have decided previously on like matters so no need to contact them :)
 
1.) Catholic hospitals' mission of healing entails their free exercise of religion. I think all the government can legally do is to say, 'if you won't do the job, send the patient to someone who will.'

2.) As for life saving: You might research the different levels of emergency care that exist in US hospitals. A hospital that is not equipped to provide a particular level of care will airlift a patient to another facility. Happens all the time.

Edited to add levels of trauma centers and services provided.

ED Facility Level Coding Guidelines

1.) they can do more and already have to facilities owned by religious orgs that dont follow public rules (IF there were any broken)

2.) see post 448
 
Generally a person does not sue and get damages paid for something that might have happened.

As to what the government can force on religion, I'd say not allowing snake handling is pretty reasonable given the likelihood of someone being injured of killed. But, like it or not, a hospital is a business, even a hospital that is based on a religious foundation. The government really can't change its business model. We all knew the ACLU was just waiting in the grass for a case like this one. As I said before, it will be a landmark case. The sad part of it is that this case is too weak to even be heard. But it will be. Catholic hospitals, even though they follow a business model, are a mission of the Catholic church. I'm not sure how many Catholic hospitals there are in the US. But I know of one in Nashville, and there is one in my hometown here in KY. There are only two hospitals in my hometown. Can you imagine what would happen if the Catholic church decided to shut down every hospital in the US? It could do that. I doubt it will, but that is an option if the government tries to change what services they offer. I think the only foundation for a finding in favor of the plaintiff is that the hospital did not make an effort to transfer the woman to a facility that would do the procedure. And that is not outlandish. We even have an Air Evac Life Team here in western KY. So, a person with a medical emergency that cannot be treated at a hospital in this area can be in Nashville in less than 20 minutes.

I think it is appropriate to remind posters of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Catholic hospitals' mission of healing entails their free exercise of religion. I think all the government can legally do is to say, 'if you won't do the job, send the patient to someone who will.'

As for life saving: You might research the different levels of emergency care that exist in US hospitals. A hospital that is not equipped to provide a particular level of care will airlift a patient to another facility. Happens all the time.

Edited to add levels of trauma centers and services provided.

ED Facility Level Coding Guidelines

Might I ask if you have a legal background? ;)
 
Your point was that the doctors did not know the condition of the woman's fetus.

Your point was a lie and exposed as such, so now you're pretending that your point is something else

It is a policy decision. And this case is about policy. You are too quick to jump on it when you don't really understand it. This case is not about medical negligence, it is about policy. She is accusing the hospital of acting in accordance with a policy. The same as a Jewish or muslim deli is acting in accordance with a policy when they refuse to serve pork. I realize that it is difficult for someone without a legal background to understand.

Might I ask if you have a legal background? ;)

To some extent. :)
 
If it gets that far, yes. But if they had a doctor's statement that (s)he didn't do X because of Directive Y, then they would need to put that in the suit to establish the role of the defendant. They are missing that piece, which is why its weak.

Not missing, just possibly to be presented at a later time.
 
Zimmerman was found not guilty. ;)

Does that matter?

You were clear that discussing the issue at hand was wrong because we did not have the other side. So inevitable guilt or innocence should be beside the point. I just want to have a discussion without the hypocrisy and double standards. By your standard, discussing that case should not have happened until all information was known.
 
I don't think a religious based business can be forced by the courts to act outside the parameters of that religion.

A hospital is not a religious based business

Which law school did you go to?

And did you graduate?
 
Last edited:
A hospital is not a religious based business

Which law school did you go to?

And did you graduate?

Owned by the church, governed by the church as a mission of the church, and operated with funds of the church. But not a religious based business? How do you figure?

And what does her credentials matter? What are yours?
 
Does that matter?

You were clear that discussing the issue at hand was wrong because we did not have the other side. So inevitable guilt or innocence should be beside the point. I just want to have a discussion without the hypocrisy and double standards. By your standard, discussing that case should not have happened until all information was known.

My "standard" was to show how trumped up the lefty hysteria over "facts not in evidence" was. And this is the same. As is the lesbian waitress.
 
My "standard" was to show how trumped up the lefty hysteria over "facts not in evidence" was. And this is the same. As is the lesbian waitress.

And many on the right had Trayvon Martin on trial before he was ever arrested. The same folks would cry foul when Zimmerman's past was brought out.

But if you are honest, most of the left and most of the right did no such things.
 
And many on the right had Trayvon Martin on trial before he was ever arrested. The same folks would cry foul when Zimmerman's past was brought out.

But if you are honest, most of the left and most of the right did no such things.

Trayvon Martin was never on trial. And he is only a household name because the left WANTED HIM TO BE.
Admit it, you guys are prone to this kind of thing.
 
Trayvon Martin was never on trial. And he is only a household name because the left WANTED HIM TO BE.
Admit it, you guys are prone to this kind of thing.

Good Lord, I need to stop feeding the trolls.
 
Owned by the church, governed by the church as a mission of the church, and operated with funds of the church. But not a religious based business? How do you figure?

And what does her credentials matter? What are yours?

Medicine is not a religious based field. It's based on science

As far as my credentials go, why didn't you bring that up when she was pestering me about where I went to law school?
 
Moderator's Warning:
No more personal attacks, no more sniping, no more de-railing the thread - the topic is about a lawsuit against a hospital, not Trayvon Martin. The next who sees it fit to ignore this warning will face the consequences.
 
Re: Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:

Medicine is not a religious based field. It's based on science

As far as my credentials go, why didn't you bring that up when she was pestering me about where I went to law school?


Medicine yes, hospital admin no.

And I figured if you wanted her creds, then the proper thing to do is lay yours out there too.
 
Re: Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:

Your point was that the doctors did not know the condition of the woman's fetus.

Your point was a lie and exposed as such, so now you're pretending that your point is something else

It is a policy decision. And this case is about policy. You are too quick to jump on it when you don't really understand it. This case is not about medical negligence, it is about policy. She is accusing the hospital of acting in accordance with a policy. The same as a Jewish or muslim deli is acting in accordance with a policy when they refuse to serve pork. I realize that it is difficult for someone without a legal background to understand.

A hospital is not a religious based business

Which law school did you go to?

And did you graduate?

Well don't tell the Pope:


Vatican City, Nov 13, 2012 / 01:02 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers announced Nov. 13 that its upcoming international conference will discuss how health facilities can maintain a Catholic identity in secular societies.

The conference will be “devoted to the study of all aspects of hospitals as privileged spaces, to fulfill both individually and collectively the baptismal mandate” to minister to the sick in imitation of the Good Samaritan, the council’s president Archbishop Zygmunt Zimowski said.

The council’s 27th international conference will take place Nov. 15 to 17 and will address the theme, “The hospital, a place of evangelization, human and spiritual mission.”

The gathering will bring together churchmen as well as health care professionals. Up for discussion will be several key issues: respect for life from conception to its natural end, compassionate care with full respect for the sick person’s identity, and palliative care, which focuses on relieving and preventing the suffering of patients

Vatican conference to examine Catholic identity in health care :: Catholic News Agency (CNA)

Yes, I graduated. Did you?
 
Last edited:
Re: Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:

No matter what the Pope says, the hospitals will need to be run in accordance with US rules and regulation and be in compliance with State regulations and the Joint Commission (etc).

Is there a regulation that forces a hospital to perform a procedure?
 
Re: Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:

Is there a regulation that forces a hospital to perform a procedure?

They need to assure the safety of their patient. If, to keep the patient safe, they have to send her to a different facility, that is ok.

I will be curious to see any kind of discharge instructions she got.
 
Re: Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:

They need to assure the safety of their patient. If, to keep the patient safe, they have to send her to a different facility, that is ok.

I will be curious to see any kind of discharge instructions she got.


I agree, but that wasn't the question
 
Re: Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:

Hospitals are supposed to inform the patient of his/her diagnosis, treatment and prognosis in terms that the patient understands.
 
Re: Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:

Medicine yes, hospital admin no.

We're talking about policies concerning medical treatment. They're based on science

And I figured if you wanted her creds, then the proper thing to do is lay yours out there too.

But if she wants my creds, she shouldn't lay out hers. :roll:
 
Re: Catholic hospital 'risked woman's life by forcing her to deliver 18-week fetus[W:

Is there a regulation that forces a hospital to perform a procedure?

The suit is not based on the hospital not being willing to perform any procedure.

There are laws which require doctors to tell their patients about their condition.
 
Back
Top Bottom