- Joined
- May 12, 2013
- Messages
- 24,776
- Reaction score
- 22,317
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
More massive speculation from US Con!!! :lamo
More like a trollish lie.
More massive speculation from US Con!!! :lamo
More massive speculation from US Con!!! :lamo
More like a trollish lie.
Lie? Where?
...
IF there was premature rupture of membraine, the baby probably needed to be delivered anyway.
The complaint is that the defendants were negligent, but not because the defendants omitted any information
declare that Defendants ’negligent acts and/or omissions caused Plaintiff injury.
English doesn't get any clearer than that.
That's right. It doesn't get any clearer. The word "omissions" does not necessarily mean "omission of information"
And what did the defendants omit that caused the Plaintiff injury? Did they forget to pray on those nights?
Omissions of action
And what did the defendants omit that caused the Plaintiff injury? Did they forget to pray on those nights?
I am not understanding your inference. The organization is not just a religious one, but one that delivers health care. Are you trying to insinuate that their only obligation to the patient was a religious one?
I'm pointing out that she is suing parties not present for negligence and omissions. Its a by-proxy charge that will likely be thrown out. We can revisit that point 6 months from now when/if this works its way through pre-trial hearings.
I'm pointing out that she is suing parties not present for negligence and omissions. Its a by-proxy charge that will likely be thrown out. We can revisit that point 6 months from now when/if this works its way through pre-trial hearings.
I am not understanding your inference. The organization is not just a religious one, but one that delivers health care. Are you trying to insinuate that their only obligation to the patient was a religious one?
One religion can have more credibility than another? I wasn't aware of that.
Appeal to tradition - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be picky, but it's his implication you don't understand. An inference would be something you draw from his post. Just sayin'.eace
One religion can have more credibility than another? I wasn't aware of that.
Appeal to tradition - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Post #399.
We are just trying to have a discussion about information about the case that has been presented. Most adults on this thread understand there are two sides and we have yet to see the other side.
Grow up.
This is exactly like the Trayvon Martin case where every lefty knew in their bones what happened.
This is exactly like that lesbian waitress.
Liberals, assuming facts not in evidence. :roll:
This is exactly like the Trayvon Martin case where every lefty knew in their bones what happened.
This is exactly like that lesbian waitress.
Liberals, assuming facts not in evidence. :roll:
Did you have any pre-trial assumptions?
The parties not present created the rules that lead to this incident.
McDonalds was on the hook for the temperature of its coffee. It creates the rules to distribute its products. So wouldn't the bishops be on the hook for their rules?
Did you have any pre-trial assumptions?
Just that we dont know that facts of the case and therefor DONT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED.
And that since neither the hospital OR any physician is named that this is not about malpractice-at least to the ACLU.
In that case, did they sue the guy who wrote the guidelines to heat coffee to 180F, or did they sue the corporation?
Futhermore, please point to the Directive that drove the results of this case. http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-act...c-Health-Care-Services-fifth-edition-2009.pdf
The guy who wrote them? Lots of people write lots of things. It is the institution that approves the use of the guidelines.
47. Operations, treatments, and medications that have as their direct purpose the cure of a
proportionately serious pathological condition of a pregnant woman are permitted when they
cannot be safely postponed until the unborn child is viable, even if they will result in the death of
the unborn child.