• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Costco labels bibles "Fiction"

In order to label the Bible "fiction" there has to be some sort of evidence to support that the Bible is fiction.

This is/was political bull**** - an attack that progressive sociopaths deny happens ....

You mean being swallowed by a whale doesn't qualify as fiction?
 
Yep and digest them not spend several nights in their belly mouth what ever

Well, outside of a killer whale - the rest eat through filtering whatever they can forage.

A Blue Whale could easily eat a person - so could Jay Carney.
 
In the very least the bible should be placed in some mature content adult section. Being as it's filled with stories of murder, rape, incest, and mass carnage, those who purchase it should be carded.
 
Let's face it. Anyone who thinks that the Bible, or any other religious work for that matter,belongs in a the "fiction" section really isn't smart enough to spend time in a book store. It isn't a comment on your beliefs. It is a comment in your basic understanding of how books are categorized. You should reconsider going back to elementary school and take another "library" class, cause I can assume you have also forgotten the Dewey decimal system too.

The fact is the book belongs in a "religion/theology" section. I would go so far as to say "philosophy." But "fiction" is a wholly incorrect categorization. The fact is that "fiction" and "theology" are NOT written for the same purposes. I think we can chalk up the smug agreement with the false categorization to those who have bone to pick with religion. Sad you would rather ignore reality and blindly agree with an obviously incorrect assessment. Ironic.
 
Last edited:
Of course your right. We were just having fun over the fictional nature of the book.
 
Let's face it. Anyone who thinks that the Bible, or any other religious work for that matter,belongs in a the "fiction" section really isn't smart enough to spend time in a book store. It isn't a comment on your beliefs. It is a comment in your basic understanding of how books are categorized. You should reconsider going back to elementary school and take another "library" class, cause I can assume you have also forgotten the Dewey decimal system too.

The fact is the book belongs in a "religion/theology" section. I would go so far as to say "philosophy." But "fiction" is a wholly incorrect categorization. The fact is that "fiction" and "theology" are NOT written for the same purposes. I think we can chalk up the smug agreement with the false categorization to those who have bone to pick with religion. Sad you would rather ignore reality and blindly agree with an obviously incorrect assessment. Ironic.

Fiction and Religion are both fictitious. The faith/spirituality (or religion/theology, depending on what bookstore you're in) is a compromise.
 
Fiction and Religion are both fictitious. The faith/spirituality (or religion/theology, depending on what bookstore you're in) is a compromise.

Regardless of whether or not you believe they are fictitious or not...only a complete and utter moron would argue that the Bible and the Great Gatsby belong in the same section. You don't put an encyclopedia in the same section as a biography of Liv Tyler...even though both maybe "true," only a retard would put a reference book in the biography section or vice Versa.

There is no argument here. The only person who would agree with the placement of the book in that section is someone who had a problem with religion and wishes to childishly "stick it" to people's faith. Ridiculous.
 
Who would call the Bible FACT?

No one with a brain.

That isn't the problem here. Book stores and libraries aren't labeled by "fact and fiction." There are far more categorizations. And anyone with a brain knows that. It doesn't take a genius to place a religious book in a religious section.

Ironic that people who hate religion because it isn't "based on facts" would blindly ignore an elementary level fact just to "stick it" to religious people. So ironic.
 
no actually scientists have dug up much of what was written in the bible and proven it to have happened,which was also written by many other ancient religions prior.the simple fact scientists went out of their way to prove or disprove locations and events in the bible,and only found that the bible overexaggerated them,but didnt lie or make them up,simply shows some will outright deny it simply because its associated with religion,and ignore the fact that prior to modern times,religious scripts were often the most common method of recording history.

Specific references and links to scientific peer-reviewed journals where this has been established please.
 
Who would call the Bible FACT?

No one with a brain.

That's a little steep. Of course the bible isn't fact, but people are born into and exposed all their lives in religion. That's why if your Indian your more likely to be a Hindu and in the ME a Muslim etc. plenty of people with properly functioning brains believe their sacred writings are fact. It's a hard thing to break away from, I think only some few actually do.
 
Back
Top Bottom