• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wal-Mart Asks Workers To Donate Food To Its Needy Employees

It's not full of anybody saying the government needs to swoop in and force them to take action. My point is simply that if they want their employees to have a nice holiday, it is entirely within their power and means to do something. They could, for example, not be open on Thanksgiving Day, but that's not going to happen.

It's not like moving from one thread to another changes who a person is. Same people hating on Walmart here are the same ones in the other Walmart and minimum wage threads.

But for the record, do you support an increase in the minimum wage?
 
:lamo

You REALLY want to pretend that small businesses hire the same number people that large retailers like WalMart do....thats...comical. You are either spouting rhetoric (lying) which is laughable or BELIEVE it...which is...sad...

(most small businesses do not hire accountants...they contract with an accounting agency)

So you ARE innumerate,then. You think 100 is greater than 7+12+5+22+16+4+11+19+5

No wonder,too. Who needs to think when uncle Rush has already done it for you,eh?

Intelligent people realize that as far as employment is concerned, there is an inverse relationship between efficiency and job creation. The more efficient a company is about doing something, the fewer jobs are necessary.That may be a no brainer to most ,but the notion obviously escapes you. Walmart is quite efficient because of its centralization and streamlining compared to a series of independents all doing the same thing and that is because of all the duplication of tasks involved in various people doing things separately. That isn't to say inefficiency is necessarily a good thing or walmart is bad, but it sure does destroy this silly notion of yours and the radio pundits that provide you your talking points that Walmart somehow creates more jobs. It doesn't. All it does is concentrate more under one employer.
 
:lamo

You REALLY want to pretend that small businesses hire the same number people that large retailers like WalMart do....thats...comical. You are either spouting rhetoric (lying) which is laughable or BELIEVE it...which is...sad...

(most small businesses do not hire accountants...they contract with an accounting agency)

So you ARE innumerate,then. You think 100 is greater than 7+12+5+22+16+4+11+19+5

No wonder,too. Who needs to think when uncle Rush has already done it for you,eh?

Intelligent people realize that as far as employment is concerned, there is an inverse relationship between efficiency and job creation. The more efficient a company is about doing something, the fewer jobs are necessary.That may be a no brainer to most ,but the notion obviously escapes you. Walmart is quite efficient because of its centralization and streamlining compared to a series of independents all doing the same thing and that is because of all the duplication of tasks involved in various people doing things separately. That isn't to say inefficiency is necessarily a good thing or walmart is bad, but it sure does destroy this silly notion of yours and the radio pundits that provide you your talking points that Walmart somehow creates more jobs. It doesn't. All it does is concentrate more under one employer.
 
Where to start?

I admire your passion and respect your point of view, but I also detect the brand of idealism that is unique to conservatism, which is that it is within anyone's power to better their position and that therefore people are responsible for themselves and not nearleach other. While I as well would prefer an economy based on high-skill, innovation, invention, and higher education for all, I also recognize that even doctors and scientists need store clerks and janitors in order to function. Where we disagree is that these latter positions should be stepping stones to the former in order to achieve a basic quality of life. There will never be enough room for everyone to have a highly valuable job, or even climb up to one within their lifetime, and I don't think people should essentially be second-class citizens for not doing so.
 
The WalMart heirs - 4 of them - only have $20 BILLION dollars each so - accordingly to Obama - are SO poor they needed government welfare in the form of exemption from ObamaCare.

According to you, they shouldn't have even been asked to provide decent insurance for their employees in the first place.
 
I admire your passion and respect your point of view, but I also detect the brand of idealism that is unique to conservatism, which is that it is within anyone's power to better their position and that therefore people are responsible for themselves and not nearleach other. While I as well would prefer an economy based on high-skill, innovation, invention, and higher education for all, I also recognize that even doctors and scientists need store clerks and janitors in order to function. Where we disagree is that these latter positions should be stepping stones to the former in order to achieve a basic quality of life. There will never be enough room for everyone to have a highly valuable job, or even climb up to one within their lifetime, and I don't think people should essentially be second-class citizens for not doing so.

I don't disagree with much of what you've said except for the last line. I'm not the one considering people who hole "entry level" or "service" jobs "second-class citizens". I don't. Neither do I think that all people or even most people who hold entry level or service jobs as being unable to climb the ladder a little or a lot higher. In fact, in Walmart, that's exactly what they do. What I do think, however, is that the entry level and/or service job in our society has limited economic value and rightly so. If stocking shelves at Walmart paid a "living wage" or better, there'd be precious little incentive for a lot of people to improve their lot in life.
 
Well it appears that a Cleveland, Ohio Walmart is holding a food drive so that it's employees can have a nice Holiday meal. The sign in the store, accompanied by several plastic bins, reads: "Please donate food items so associates in need can enjoy Thanksgiving dinner."

Really? Thank goodness those people are employed so those associates don't have to get on food stamps. :roll:

What cracks me up with some people that see nothing wrong with what Walmart is doing would probably go berserk if you wished them "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas." :roll:

Well the rich certainly ain't gonna do it.
 
According to you, they shouldn't have even been asked to provide decent insurance for their employees in the first place.

Perhaps they should pull an Oprah Winfrey and give all there employees "brand new cars" too, right?

After Walmart gives all their deserving employees all these additional benefits and increases in wages, are you going to force people to shop there when all their prices skyrocket? Because you know, don't you, that people aren't going to pay more for a package of toilet paper simply because the Walmart clan pays better wages and benefits.
 
I don't have anything against private charity, but if this is so important to Wal-Mart, maybe it would help if they paid their employees more. Or if it's so important to the corporate office, why don't they put these together and take care of their employees?

Maybe it was set up by one Wal-Mart employee to help out others.
 
1st, its not "WalMart" it is that particular WalMart and they are doing it for employees that have faced recent severe hardships. Second...out of curiosity...do you donate the buck at the local grocery store or convenience store or wherever to contribute to the cause of the day?

I don't. I have no idea where that money is going or if it will ever get to the people on the poster.
 
So you ARE innumerate,then. You think 100 is greater than 7+12+5+22+16+4+11+19+5

No wonder,too. Who needs to think when uncle Rush has already done it for you,eh?

Intelligent people realize that as far as employment is concerned, there is an inverse relationship between efficiency and job creation. The more efficient a company is about doing something, the fewer jobs are necessary.That may be a no brainer to most ,but the notion obviously escapes you. Walmart is quite efficient because of its centralization and streamlining compared to a series of independents all doing the same thing and that is because of all the duplication of tasks involved in various people doing things separately. That isn't to say inefficiency is necessarily a good thing or walmart is bad, but it sure does destroy this silly notion of yours and the radio pundits that provide you your talking points that Walmart somehow creates more jobs. It doesn't. All it does is concentrate more under one employer.
:lamo the last refuge of the simpleton...invoke Rush Limbaugh. Hey...maybe throw in a "Fox News" in there for good measure!

You are seriously dishonest or seriously uninformed. Your knowledge of community economics is just...nonexistent. Your pretense that small businesses in ANY given community employ more people than a WalMart is equally silly. Your lack of knowledge about the co-occurring economic factors should be embarrassing. Sadly, you will...soldier on...dont worry...merely a flesh wound. You've 'ad worse.
 
Perhaps they should pull an Oprah Winfrey and give all there employees "brand new cars" too, right?

After Walmart gives all their deserving employees all these additional benefits and increases in wages, are you going to force people to shop there when all their prices skyrocket? Because you know, don't you, that people aren't going to pay more for a package of toilet paper simply because the Walmart clan pays better wages and benefits.

Greetingss, JC. :2wave:

Ironically, yesterday I heard someone make the grumbling statement "yeah, but it doesn't do much for me, does it?," when talking about Dairy Queen raising their prices recently due to the cost of increases in milk and other dairy products. Human nature can be counted on to look out for number one where money is concerned, I guess.
 
Seems like this thread went off topic before I got a chance to address the issue! So, I'll just say that a lot of the comments underline my main frustration with conservative and libertarian drones - the complete reluctance to criticize corporations, billionaires because of adherence to the holy faith of free market fundamentalism! This reminds me of how, back during the banking meltdown a few years ago, when the bankers went to the Government for bailouts to cover their bets on derivatives markets, the tea baggers and tea party activists channeled all of their rage at Obama, the Obama Administration, and the unfortunate late entries into the overinflated real estate markets, many of whom bought liar loans that shouldn't have even been legal in the first place. But, you would have to look long and hard to find any conservative or any libertarian criticize AIG Insurance, Goldmann-Sachs, or the other investment banks. The Republicans claimed that bad banks should be allowed to fail, but they conveniently dropped the subject and approved Bush's bailout once Lehman Bros. went down! But, up and down right wing opinion, there is no one to be found who criticizes corporate power or who even advances the notion that...maybe these guys are too powerful and need to be reigned in a bit!

In the Walmart example, conservatives seem to think it's fine and dandy for the family that still has most of the shares to be sitting on a pile of cash greater in size than the net worth of the poorest half of the U.S. population! There's no criticism of Walmart for paying employees so poorly that they can qualify for relief benefits like food stamps...instead the answer is to cut off food stamps!

Instead of Walmart asking for donations for their poorly payed employees from other poorly payed employees, how about the State says to Walmart:' no need for your charitable efforts, we're raising the minimum wage to $15.00 per hour, so you're going to have to cut into the vast treasure of wealth you have amassed through your outsourcing and low wage policies over the years.' Of course no state, local or national government is going to do it right now, because the vast majority of Democratic and Republican politicians are on the take! And are either taking money now from their corporate sponsors, or are expecting generous rewards for their services on behalf of their corporate masters after they retire from political office...heck, some are in and out of government and private business, like banks and oil companies so they can keep changing laws and regulations on behalf of their real constituents: the bankers and oil company executives. And Walmart has a piece of that action as well, like almost every other corporation.
 
Seems like this thread went off topic before I got a chance to address the issue! So, I'll just say that a lot of the comments underline my main frustration with conservative and libertarian drones - the complete reluctance to criticize corporations, billionaires because of adherence to the holy faith of free market fundamentalism! This reminds me of how, back during the banking meltdown a few years ago, when the bankers went to the Government for bailouts to cover their bets on derivatives markets, the tea baggers and tea party activists channeled all of their rage at Obama, the Obama Administration, and the unfortunate late entries into the overinflated real estate markets, many of whom bought liar loans that shouldn't have even been legal in the first place. But, you would have to look long and hard to find any conservative or any libertarian criticize AIG Insurance, Goldmann-Sachs, or the other investment banks. The Republicans claimed that bad banks should be allowed to fail, but they conveniently dropped the subject and approved Bush's bailout once Lehman Bros. went down! But, up and down right wing opinion, there is no one to be found who criticizes corporate power or who even advances the notion that...maybe these guys are too powerful and need to be reigned in a bit!

In the Walmart example, conservatives seem to think it's fine and dandy for the family that still has most of the shares to be sitting on a pile of cash greater in size than the net worth of the poorest half of the U.S. population! There's no criticism of Walmart for paying employees so poorly that they can qualify for relief benefits like food stamps...instead the answer is to cut off food stamps!

Instead of Walmart asking for donations for their poorly payed employees from other poorly payed employees, how about the State says to Walmart:' no need for your charitable efforts, we're raising the minimum wage to $15.00 per hour, so you're going to have to cut into the vast treasure of wealth you have amassed through your outsourcing and low wage policies over the years.' Of course no state, local or national government is going to do it right now, because the vast majority of Democratic and Republican politicians are on the take! And are either taking money now from their corporate sponsors, or are expecting generous rewards for their services on behalf of their corporate masters after they retire from political office...heck, some are in and out of government and private business, like banks and oil companies so they can keep changing laws and regulations on behalf of their real constituents: the bankers and oil company executives. And Walmart has a piece of that action as well, like almost every other corporation.



In short, what the state should do is pass a law that ensures that Walmart's charity drive is for EX-employees.
 
Right! I work for a pretty good company that pays wells and every year we do a food drive and make thanksgiving baskets for other coworkers that may have had a tough year or just need some help. Not one coworker has ever made negative remarks or complained that we should all just get paid some more. They put their can of creamed corn in the box and moves along with their day. :)

Also on Christmas we put a tree up and hang up children's gloves, hats, and scarves to distribute. How diabolical of the company to allow that, the big boss should just distribute money so the parents can buy want they want!

I'm trying to imagine going to my company, saying I've had a tough year, could I get part of the food drive that they held for employees with tough years? I'd feel horrible, even if I had a tough year, knowing I was taking food from fellow employees. How do they decide who gets the extra help? And do employees feel pressured to donate something because the box is sitting right there?

I think if the store wants to give their employees - all of their employees, not just those who say they had a tough time - a nice holiday, they can give them a cash bonus. Those who don't need it can choose to give it to a charity of their choice. Those who need it will be grateful and not feel singled out.

Re giving trees - every time I've participated in a company giving tree, we've been told the first name of a kid and what to buy them; we aren't just buying them random things.
 
The Rachel Maddow Show on msnbc

I don't have cable and have to watch pundits once the shows are on-line. I'm just now getting around to last night's when I heard the BEST one sentence about this topic to date... It's in the 3rd video at the RMS. A former Walmart employee, current anti-Walmart activist is being interviewed by RM.

Vanessa Ferreira says, "What do they want these associates to donate with, their food stamps?"
 
The Rachel Maddow Show on msnbc

I don't have cable and have to watch pundits once the shows are on-line. I'm just now getting around to last night's when I heard the BEST one sentence about this topic to date... It's in the 3rd video 8:18m at the RMS. A former Walmart employee, current anti-Walmart activist is being interviewed by RM.

Vanessa Ferreira says, "What do they want these associates to donate with, their food stamps?"
 
Maybe it was set up by one Wal-Mart employee to help out others.

Don't get us wrong, we don't have anything against food drives or charities if it goes to the needy. Whoever set this up obviously cared for the welfare of those employees. Maybe it was concerned co-workers or maybe management frustrated by company policies. The point is that it revealed a truth about the company and our times that is difficult to ignore, that the new normal is that the needy may be fully employed and still be needy.
 
Anyone who walks into a Wal-Mart, knowing what they are, is so self centered and greedy I doubt they are even remotely willing to help someone else unless there is a tax break in it for them.

This could possibly be the most uniformed, ignorant statement I've ever seen on these boards.
 
Greetingss, JC. :2wave:

Ironically, yesterday I heard someone make the grumbling statement "yeah, but it doesn't do much for me, does it?," when talking about Dairy Queen raising their prices recently due to the cost of increases in milk and other dairy products. Human nature can be counted on to look out for number one where money is concerned, I guess.

Good afternoon Lady P.

And that's how it should be, in my view - Walmart's business is to make money from retail sales. To profit, they must find the lowest cost goods to be competitive and they must pay the going rate for employees in the areas they locate. If they'd done otherwise, they wouldn't be the successful business they are today.
 
Seems like this thread went off topic before I got a chance to address the issue! So, I'll just say that a lot of the comments underline my main frustration with conservative and libertarian drones - the complete reluctance to criticize corporations, billionaires because of adherence to the holy faith of free market fundamentalism! This reminds me of how, back during the banking meltdown a few years ago, when the bankers went to the Government for bailouts to cover their bets on derivatives markets, the tea baggers and tea party activists channeled all of their rage at Obama, the Obama Administration, and the unfortunate late entries into the overinflated real estate markets, many of whom bought liar loans that shouldn't have even been legal in the first place. But, you would have to look long and hard to find any conservative or any libertarian criticize AIG Insurance, Goldmann-Sachs, or the other investment banks. The Republicans claimed that bad banks should be allowed to fail, but they conveniently dropped the subject and approved Bush's bailout once Lehman Bros. went down! But, up and down right wing opinion, there is no one to be found who criticizes corporate power or who even advances the notion that...maybe these guys are too powerful and need to be reigned in a bit!

In the Walmart example, conservatives seem to think it's fine and dandy for the family that still has most of the shares to be sitting on a pile of cash greater in size than the net worth of the poorest half of the U.S. population! There's no criticism of Walmart for paying employees so poorly that they can qualify for relief benefits like food stamps...instead the answer is to cut off food stamps!

Instead of Walmart asking for donations for their poorly payed employees from other poorly payed employees, how about the State says to Walmart:' no need for your charitable efforts, we're raising the minimum wage to $15.00 per hour, so you're going to have to cut into the vast treasure of wealth you have amassed through your outsourcing and low wage policies over the years.' Of course no state, local or national government is going to do it right now, because the vast majority of Democratic and Republican politicians are on the take! And are either taking money now from their corporate sponsors, or are expecting generous rewards for their services on behalf of their corporate masters after they retire from political office...heck, some are in and out of government and private business, like banks and oil companies so they can keep changing laws and regulations on behalf of their real constituents: the bankers and oil company executives. And Walmart has a piece of that action as well, like almost every other corporation.

Far right thinks that way , their is moderate and being in the middle . Quite unfortunately your ideas just do not pan out . Lets say the minnum wage is increased their are a vast amount of possibilities that would not benefit but most likely worsen the situation . How would it help any way if people are making more money ( even if it doesn't fail before that point ) prices would just sky rocket again since if your making 15 dollar's an hour for a job that requires no thought than what should people who do something more meaningful than restocking shelves and checking out food . ( even if that was a overstatement prices will still inflate and will certainly be more ridiculous then today ) like for example when you would make 9 dollars a week and things cost a nickel when people made more money so did the prices .My tiff with your the corporation statement is that most corporations did not start that way and without human nature and our own desire for cheaper products would not be the way they are today . Like McDonald they were a mom and pop and now they are a corporation . I put in a earlier post that the purpose of making a store is for profit and making money why should we all be looking at them as if all problems would be solved if they gave more . The other things about oil and banks we were the people who put them in power and when it comes to money people get cold . I do agree people should be wary corporations getting to large but society as a whole should be writing them off and have a social justice streak in which the companies get boycotted , but by the peoples hand and not the government . Many things that sound good on paper work terrible in real life since it negates the nature of the beast . ( by beast I means human and our own tendencies and nature )

Other issues need to be solved before this is even considered plausible . Outsourcing is one of them that needs to be solved which is whole other issue entirely . You cant tackle part of them problem especially when you have another part that comes before it ( yes as said before out sourcing ) .
 
:lamo the last refuge of the simpleton...invoke Rush Limbaugh. Hey...maybe throw in a "Fox News" in there for good measure!

You are seriously dishonest or seriously uninformed. Your knowledge of community economics is just...nonexistent. Your pretense that small businesses in ANY given community employ more people than a WalMart is equally silly. Your lack of knowledge about the co-occurring economic factors should be embarrassing. Sadly, you will...soldier on...dont worry...merely a flesh wound. You've 'ad worse.

I do have to admit that I didn't think you were capable of understanding any of the concepts I mentioned,and you sure didn't disappoint in that regard.


Here is a little something for those who can.

http://advocate.nyc.gov/files/Walmart.pdf
 
Seems like this thread went off topic before I got a chance to address the issue! So, I'll just say that a lot of the comments underline my main frustration with conservative and libertarian drones - the complete reluctance to criticize corporations, billionaires because of adherence to the holy faith of free market fundamentalism! This reminds me of how, back during the banking meltdown a few years ago, when the bankers went to the Government for bailouts to cover their bets on derivatives markets, the tea baggers and tea party activists channeled all of their rage at Obama, the Obama Administration, and the unfortunate late entries into the overinflated real estate markets, many of whom bought liar loans that shouldn't have even been legal in the first place. But, you would have to look long and hard to find any conservative or any libertarian criticize AIG Insurance, Goldmann-Sachs, or the other investment banks. The Republicans claimed that bad banks should be allowed to fail, but they conveniently dropped the subject and approved Bush's bailout once Lehman Bros. went down! But, up and down right wing opinion, there is no one to be found who criticizes corporate power or who even advances the notion that...maybe these guys are too powerful and need to be reigned in a bit!

In the Walmart example, conservatives seem to think it's fine and dandy for the family that still has most of the shares to be sitting on a pile of cash greater in size than the net worth of the poorest half of the U.S. population! There's no criticism of Walmart for paying employees so poorly that they can qualify for relief benefits like food stamps...instead the answer is to cut off food stamps!

Instead of Walmart asking for donations for their poorly payed employees from other poorly payed employees, how about the State says to Walmart:' no need for your charitable efforts, we're raising the minimum wage to $15.00 per hour, so you're going to have to cut into the vast treasure of wealth you have amassed through your outsourcing and low wage policies over the years.' Of course no state, local or national government is going to do it right now, because the vast majority of Democratic and Republican politicians are on the take! And are either taking money now from their corporate sponsors, or are expecting generous rewards for their services on behalf of their corporate masters after they retire from political office...heck, some are in and out of government and private business, like banks and oil companies so they can keep changing laws and regulations on behalf of their real constituents: the bankers and oil company executives. And Walmart has a piece of that action as well, like almost every other corporation.

Sorry, but you've got at least three things wrong:

1. You assume that conservatives, at least those who believe in free enterprise, have anything to be critical of when discussing Walmart's business practices and the "billionaires" who own them. The Waltons built a business legally - made it wildly profitable - employ 2.2 million people along the way - and donate to charities of their own choosing. They had sales of $466 billion in 11,000 locations, about $42 million in sales for each store - so, clearly, even though you and others think they are evil incarnate, they are actually serving a pretty significant need in the places they locate. Would you rather they were like Solyndra - no sales and $500 million in government grants burnt up in the hot sun?

2. You assume that Walmart isn't paying people $15 hour. From what the OP provides, the average wage at Walmart for full time employees is just under $13 hour. That tells me that lots of people are making $15 hour and many are making much more. Depending on how long they've been working there and whether they've advanced to higher paying positions.

3. You have no concept of business and how business runs if you think that the heirs to the Walmart fortune and business pump their own personal funds into the business to provide salary increases or any other benefits. The people who run the business, hands on, make business decisions about cost inputs and how any increases will affect the bottom line, up or down. I suppose you think Bill and Melinda Gates should have taken their $50 billion and funnelled it back into higher salaries and benefits for the people who work at Microsoft.

If you stick with socialism, my friend, you're going to have a lifetime of envy and disappointment ahead of you. People with any initiative or sense of self-worth want to be the next founder of the next Walmart or Microsoft, not the next $20 hour low level employee working for them.
 
Last edited:
Seems like this thread went off topic before I got a chance to address the issue! So, I'll just say that a lot of the comments underline my main frustration with conservative and libertarian drones - the complete reluctance to criticize corporations, billionaires because of adherence to the holy faith of free market fundamentalism! .

You can thank Reagan for that. He implemented the plan perfectly by eliminating the fairness doctrine while undermining unions. With the resulting ability of enormous corporations to control the message through the airwaves and the lessening of the effect of union organizers,they were able to turn enough of the poorly educated white labor base into their ideological foot soldiers.

I miss the days when republicans were all about small business, myself. Most of the people here are too young to remember those days, though, as most have grown up in the post Reagan world.
 
Back
Top Bottom