• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wal-Mart Asks Workers To Donate Food To Its Needy Employees

Name me some of these costs.

[Edit] - Before I start down that road, I seriously hope that you're not counting brief periods of tax abatement and municipality-based infrastructure costs as "socialized". If you do, you're wrong. Those are contained externalities.

Their employees are paid so little that many of them qualify for food stamps and sometimes other government benefits, that is a taxpayer subsidy for Walmart.
 
If I could like your Post more than once, I would TED..I feel a bit guilty for not having kids but being a retired teacher still involved with kids allows me to feel your anxst..just know that it will be worth it as with your neighbor when her kids graduate college--career--marriage--grands--etc .

No need to feel guilty, it isn't your duty to the species to have kids.
 
Well it appears that a Cleveland, Ohio Walmart is holding a food drive so that it's employees can have a nice Holiday meal. The sign in the store, accompanied by several plastic bins, reads: "Please donate food items so associates in need can enjoy Thanksgiving dinner."

Really? Thank goodness those people are employed so those associates don't have to get on food stamps. :roll:

What cracks me up with some people that see nothing wrong with what Walmart is doing would probably go berserk if you wished them "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas." :roll:

That is just humiliating.
 
You know in one way I don't have a problem with employees helping employees. It's a nice gesture. But at the same time it really truly makes Wal*Mart look horrible.
 
Walmart employs people that no one else will employs.
I often go to Walmart in Penselvaniya and see who works there. Nice people, but bad workers.
Products in Walmart cheap. But if the store will pay them as doctors or stock-brokers, no one there will be buy. The prose of life. I'm sorry ..
 
Well it appears that a Cleveland, Ohio Walmart is holding a food drive so that it's employees can have a nice Holiday meal. The sign in the store, accompanied by several plastic bins, reads: "Please donate food items so associates in need can enjoy Thanksgiving dinner."

Really? Thank goodness those people are employed so those associates don't have to get on food stamps. :roll:

What cracks me up with some people that see nothing wrong with what Walmart is doing would probably go berserk if you wished them "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas." :roll:

Wal-Mart might be the best example of what's wrong with America. Wal-Mart won its dominance by taken advantage of global free trade policies, stocking its stores with goods made in China et al. and driving prices down just low enough to price out its local competitors. This simultaneously drives two industries out of business: American manufacturing, which cannot compete with foreign manufacturer's low wages and lax human rights laws, and local retailers that cannot sell bulk goods on the same scale and thus can't sell at Wal-Mart's prices.

The truly exploitive part is how Wal-Mart then fosters societies of total dependency on their stores. With manufacturing and retail jobs lost, Wal-Mart has a swollen labor force from which to hire, and can therefore offer low wages, to the point where we now are expected to donate to them in order for them to survive. And of course where can they afford to shop anymore, but Wal-Mart.

Wal-Mart is a nation-wide Pullman, a new sort of principality run with the blessing of the US Government, complete with its own dynasty of four out of the top ten richest Americans alive. When you talk about makers vs. takers, how can you not count the Waltons as takers?

This is probably the most visible example of how these low, low prices and low, low wages must be subsidized somewhere, and usually its by us.
 
Are they really getting an exemption???? I hadn't heard that. I know all corps are getting a delay, but getting an exemption? Please provide a link.

I'll try to find it and hope I didn't get it wrong. Over 1000 waivers have been granted - a total of about 2.6 million - but the government pulled down the website it had of the list. McDonalds, Red Lobster, most unions, insurance companies etc etc.

WalMart's first official response to ObamaCare was to reduce basically all employees except management to part-time (ie only 29 hours) - and sending a letter to the President explaining they can't afford the premiums and asking for a waiver. I've read that letter. I'll try to find the list of the companies given exemptions.
 
Wal-Mart might be the best example of what's wrong with America. Wal-Mart won its dominance by taken advantage of global free trade policies, stocking its stores with goods made in China et al. and driving prices down just low enough to price out its local competitors. This simultaneously drives two industries out of business: American manufacturing, which cannot compete with foreign manufacturer's low wages and lax human rights laws, and local retailers that cannot sell bulk goods on the same scale and thus can't sell at Wal-Mart's prices.

The truly exploitive part is how Wal-Mart then fosters societies of total dependency on their stores. With manufacturing and retail jobs lost, Wal-Mart has a swollen labor force from which to hire, and can therefore offer low wages, to the point where we now are expected to donate to them in order for them to survive. And of course where can they afford to shop anymore, but Wal-Mart.

Wal-Mart is a nation-wide Pullman, a new sort of principality run with the blessing of the US Government, complete with its own dynasty of four out of the top ten richest Americans alive. When you talk about makers vs. takers, how can you not count the Waltons as takers?

This is probably the most visible example of how these low, low prices and low, low wages must be subsidized somewhere, and usually its by us.

I spoke with a FedEx representative who handles arranging cargo containers and shipments from China, including for WalMart vendors. He explained that every year at contract time, WalMart expects suppliers to reduce their wholesale cost by 2%. When it reaches a point the vendor/supplier can't afford to lower prices and quality anymore, WalMart reps will guide them on how to shift their production from the USA to China. Of course, increasingly WalMart is opening up it's own factories in China.

It is not JUST that WalMart buys from China. WalMart proactively moves American company operations to China - and increasingly itself is a Chinese manufacturer.
 
Difference is Walmart has the power to do the right thing but they choose not to do it. Instead they make massive profits off the backs of their employees and also government subsidies. They have their cake and eat it too.

Is Walmart breaking the law?

Does Walmart force people to work for them or shop in their stores?

Do you give all your extra income to charity?
 
The entitlement mentality of liberals contributes to the decay of the welfare of the state.

Hey, maybe the Treasury should just print up enough money to make us all rich. :roll:
 
It's not hyperbole. Other business models have paid their employees better for doing the same thing. There is no reason they can't follow a more respectable business model. Also, I never shop at Walmart.

Name one business in competition with Walmart that pays their employees better for doing the same job. Unless it's hyperbole, this should be easy for you.
 
That's not what Kory Lundberg from Walmart said:



And if it's the majority, than 1.3 million people is a huge chunk. ;)

More Than Half of Wal-Mart's Hourly Workers Make Less Than $25,000

So, assuming you're correct, you have two people to blame:

1. You can blame the full time employee settling for $25,000 in yearly income because they didn't complete their education or didn't take seriously their education and now they have no skills or skills that are unattractive and of low value to the people who hire.

2. You can blame Obama and his administration for not developing/encouraging an economic environment where highly skilled and educated citizens can get and keep jobs that match those skills and that education.

Again, you can't blame Walmart because they don't force people to work in their stores and they don't force people to shop there. In your view, Walmart is responsible for correcting the bad life choices of their employees and the bad economic policies of the government. They're not. Walmart has no trouble finding employees at the wages they pay. If you want them to pay more, it will require them having more competition for their employees - simple as that.
 
Well it appears that a Cleveland, Ohio Walmart is holding a food drive so that it's employees can have a nice Holiday meal. The sign in the store, accompanied by several plastic bins, reads: "Please donate food items so associates in need can enjoy Thanksgiving dinner."

Really? Thank goodness those people are employed so those associates don't have to get on food stamps. :roll:

What cracks me up with some people that see nothing wrong with what Walmart is doing would probably go berserk if you wished them "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas." :roll:


I'm not really seeing what the issue is here. If someone have 15 kids and is trying to support them while working at Walmart, is that really Walmart fault? It's not really walmart's place as an employer to address the various issues of every employee and it's not like the skills needed to work at walmart are the most demanding.

So if you have a point you are trying to make about the general wage they employ, you could likely find better ways to do that
 
Hey, maybe the Treasury should just print up enough money to make us all rich. :roll:

I sure hope you're going to push for higher wages for those papermill workers considering all the extra work they're going to have to put in to supply the treasury. And don't forget the ink manufacturers too.
 
Is Walmart breaking the law?

Does Walmart force people to work for them or shop in their stores?

Do you give all your extra income to charity?

All beside the point. Those financial instruments the financial institutions used didn't break the law either and yet it caused a hazard to the entire economy.
 
Last edited:
The entitlement mentality of liberals contributes to the decay of the welfare of the state.

No, it's the entitlement mentality of businesses like Walmart. Most people don't want to be poor and live off the government which goes against everything certain people around believe.
 
All beside the point. Those financial instruments the financial institutions used didn't break the law either and yet it caused a hazard to the entire economy.

Actually, those financial institutions did break the law - that's why they paid hundreds of $billions in fines to the federal government - or did you just think they donated the money out of charitable good will?

Clearly, you wouldn't want to work for Walmart - with your entitlement mentality, I'm pretty sure their not too distressed.
 
Stop & Shop

Stop & Shop competes with Walmart? I've never heard of them. Clearly, you have a very strange understanding of competition - but then, you don't seem to understand competition in the labor market either, so not too surprising.
 
Back
Top Bottom