• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

George Zimmerman Arrested Again In Central Florida [W:351]

mak2 said:
No, it doesnt. Not guilty is not saying he was Proven innocent, there was not enough evidence to convict him. Remeber he killed the other witness.
Click to expand...

He doesn't have to be proven innocent. He's innocent until proven guilty in this country (at least that's how it's supposed to be before the media became the judge jury and executioner), thus, by default he's innocent. Burden is on the state.
No I remember there being a whole slew of witnesses on the stand.
 
mak2 said:
, there was not enough evidence to convict him, that is all.
Click to expand...
Wrong. That is an excuse.
There was no such evidence.


mak2 said:
in which he shot an unarmed minor,
Click to expand...
More dishonesty I see.
He shot a young adult who was using his own body as a weapon. That is not being unarmed.
 
Excon said:
Wrong. That is an excuse.
There was no such evidence.



More dishonesty I see.
He shot a young adult who was using his own body as a weapon. That is not being unarmed.
Click to expand...

You are right, he was armed. And legged.
 
trayvonbooksm.jpg



Jack Cashill talks about his new book.

10 Minute preview.


Full.

Politics - "'If I Had a Son': Race, Guns, and the Railroading of George Zimmerman" - Book TV
 
Last edited:
The Mark said:
Personally, I think the prosecution should have tried for a lesser conviction, because the evidence just wasn't there for what he was charged with.


That is, of course, based on limited knowledge of the full details.
Click to expand...
Lesser was included.
The jury didn't find him guilty of that either.
 
Excon said:
Lesser was included.
The jury didn't find him guilty of that either.
Click to expand...
Less than that, then? I forget and/or never knew the details of the charges.
 
The Mark said:
Personally, I think the prosecution should have tried for a lesser conviction, because the evidence just wasn't there for what he was charged with.


That is, of course, based on limited knowledge of the full details.
Click to expand...

How could he have been found guilty of a lesser charge? What charge and using what evidence? In the words of our beloved Tom Cruise: "it doesn't matter what I know. It only matters what we can prove."

Did you order the code red?
 
Puigb said:
I should buy that "book" and use the pages as bird cage liners.
Click to expand...
Ahhhhhhhhhhh. Someone sounds a little hurt.
Why is that?
Can't accept the facts for what they are?

I have a better suggestion.
Buy the epub version and use your monitor to line your bird cage.
 
Excon said:
Ahhhhhhhhhhh. Someone sounds a little hurt.
Why is that?
Can't accept the facts for what they are?

I have a better suggestion.
Buy the epub version and use your monitor to line your bird cage.
Click to expand...

Ouch, conservatives, opps, I mean "independents" sure get feisty when someone talks negatively about one of their messiahs.
 
Puigb said:
Ouch, conservatives, opps, I mean "independents", sure get feisty when someone talks negatively about one of their messiahs.
Click to expand...
:doh
Said the person who can't accept the evidence.
 
Excon said:
:doh
Said the person who can't accept the evidence.
Click to expand...

I accept the evidence just fine.

I heard ZimmerChrist is selling paintings on eBay. Perhaps world renowned author Jack Cashill should bid for it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom