Re: George Zimmerman Arrested Again In Central Florida
I said there was no video, you said I was wrong. Since I was wrong there must be a video, I simply asked for you to provide a link.
What? No video. That's what I said.
:doh:doh
I see you also have trouble following.
I replied to your
no evidence of by saying the following.
Which is clear by the last sentence.
Wrong!
His injuries were consistent with his claim of an attack. That is evidence of.
And then you replied with more video bs.
And I replied by pointing out by asking if I said anything about a video, which I hadn't.
I replied to you claim of no evidence of.
Zimmerman didn't cry out for help until AFTER the fight started. That is not indicative of who started the fight, only that Zimmerman was losing.
Oy vey! One does not call out for help in a mutual confrontation.
There was no fight. It was an attack.
We are talking a very limited amount of time here.
There was no mutual confrontation but an attack and an immediate calling for help.
Zimmerman has shown a willingness to lie to the court.
Really? Where?
You shouldn't even go there because you are wrong.
Ahhh - yes it is. What is unknown is who started the fight.
Ah no it wasn't. We have evidence that it was by the very person being attacked.
The evidence in toto does not support that it was a fight but an attack.
Your beliefs on this are convoluted.
The prosecution failed to prove a case .
Right. Which isn't because there was evidence that could be found against Zimmerman, it was because the evidence pointed to his claim being accurate and believable.
You have yet to display such knowledge.
No it means that the witness didn't see it.
In addition brandishing a weapon does not mean it has to be removed from the holster. You know that right?
More silliness I see.
The witness not seeing it and Trayvon not saying anything about a gun to anybody, especially to a third party, who told him to stop, supports Zimmerman's account of when the gun came out.
Faulty logic. The phone call ended immediately after contact. It's illogical to assume that Martin was going to continue to describe to Rachel what was happening after he'd dropped the phone and the call ended.
Yes your logic is faulty.
He made no exclamation.
Rachel heard a little "get off" passed the point where Trayvon attack Zimmerman. Had Trayvon seen the gun and was reacting to it, he more than likely would have made a verbal exclamation about the gun, which Rachel would have heard, yet did not. The gun wasn't out or shown.
Again you incorrectly assume that threatening with a gun requires the removal of the gun from the holster. It doesn't.
:dohWrong. The gun wasn't out and he hadn't seen it either or he would have said something. Especially to someone who could help like John.
Instead he ignored John call to stop, which is what an attacker would do.
He attacked Zimmerman and lost his life for it.