1.) Technically I suppose it does, but so what? You're nit picking the true nature of this bill. When was the last time you heard a heterosexual claim they were discriminated against based on their heterosexualism? Probably never, so to whom does this law really apply too? Your failure to acknowledge that is what marginalizes you constantly in these threads.
2.) Of course it matters because it solidifies the argument that many are making here, and that is this is a law that although applies to everyone, (Like all laws are supposed too) really only a very small few that would ever need to use it.
3.) What facts? My experience is all I have. I've met many gays and they all exhibit the same character flaws. Perhaps your experiences are much different, are they?
4.)Naw, can't be, but if it makes you feel better about yourself then I'm super duper ok with it.
5.)Claiming that the bill protects all of us is like stating the blatantly obvious, thank you. You have a remarkable knack for doing just that, but when challenged on the minutia and the finer details of a particular issue, you fall back on the painfully obvious and claim that the minutia and finer details lack standing. All laws protect all of us equally, at least they're supposed to, so now what AGENTJ, how do we further the argument? How about an approach similar to that presented here in this thread that perhaps, just perhaps after the factually recognizable obvious nature of all laws applying to all Americans, but the objective notion that perhaps, just maybe, maybe even most assuredly this particular law in all practical applications really only applies to homosexuals? And to further it even more, perhaps, just perhaps this law was designed to pin conservatives to the political wall in the Senate and the House, and was passed not so much because democrats care about homosexuals more than republicans, but to create a contentious issue for the upcoming mid-terms that would allow democrats that are in trouble because of Obamacare another manufactured football they can pass on to republicans and make whatever political hey they wish to make as a direct attack vehicle? Pandering doesn't make any sense, dems already have the gay vote, but they do need fodder, and painting republicans as racists, and homophobes seems to work well these days..
Tim-