• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

School shooting this morning . . .

If you really believe that, you're missing a lot.

Btw, gun fights are not something that really happens. This isn't Iraq. Some stop pretending this is the Wild West and you're John Wayne.

Its not what I believe. It is what I know and what your posts clearly indicate you don't know. And wild west gun fighting has no relevance to what goes on now. You feel a desperate need to counter what i have said, and lacking any relevant experience or knowledge you just make pronouncements as if they matter to us in the circle of the knowing. You speak out your 6 that gun bans and magazine limits are "minor" without having any evidence of that. They are minor to you because you aren't a shooter and you appear to be afraid of guns. You spew bovine excrement that 7 rounds is enough. Based on what?

your unbridled love for Andrew Cuomo's mediocre intellect?
 
easy - the person whom you quoted has been lobbying for more and more gun proliferation for years now and uses this so called excuse of "gun free zones" to push that idea.

gun proliferation-the Democratic Party's term for law abiding citizens being able to exercise their rights without being hassled by the scummy Dem party jerkoffs in Congress?
 
Its not what I believe. It is what I know and what your posts clearly indicate you don't know. And wild west gun fighting has no relevance to what goes on now. You feel a desperate need to counter what i have said, and lacking any relevant experience or knowledge you just make pronouncements as if they matter to us in the circle of the knowing. You speak out your 6 that gun bans and magazine limits are "minor" without having any evidence of that. They are minor to you because you aren't a shooter and you appear to be afraid of guns. You spew bovine excrement that 7 rounds is enough. Based on what?

your unbridled love for Andrew Cuomo's mediocre intellect?

As I said, you're missing a lot. You're getting emotional again. I'll come back when you're more rational.
 
As I said, you're missing a lot. You're getting emotional again. I'll come back when you're more rational.

when your nonsense is devoid of facts and you are getting hammered by the pickaxe of reality, I guess sanctimonious arrogance is all that is left
 
easy - the person whom you quoted has been lobbying for more and more gun proliferation for years now and uses this so called excuse of "gun free zones" to push that idea.

So, what is the purpose of gun free zones then, seeing this is almost the only place this stuff happens.

No pro gun person on here has been lobbying for "gun proliferation" Only to be left alone for the guns they, themselves, do have and may want in the future. So, that is a flat out lie.
 
That is a bald faced complete lie as I advocated nothing of the kind.

And the dance of discounting personal accountability continues......
 
And you won't be proficient with seven? Really?

lets see 7 head shots or 20 head shots, that couple in the Manhattan range rover could have been a lot more effective using my weapon
 
lets see 7 head shots or 20 head shots, that couple in the Manhattan range rover could have been a lot more effective using my weapon

So you wanted to make a bad situation worse? Really?
 
So you wanted to make a bad situation worse? Really?

another irrational comment. dead scumbags is not making the situation worse. Someone getting beaten up by thugs is
 
1 head shot is usually enough to render someone dead or a vegetable.

yeah generally. Gabby Giffords was the light side of the usual outcome. Its generally hard to hit someone in the head in high stress situations
 
So you wanted to make a bad situation worse? Really?

It would have made it much better, our own sheriff said the driver should have shot half of those idiots
 
1 head shot is usually enough to render someone dead or a vegetable.

Yep. There wasn't likely a need to have 20 corpses. 7 would have dispersed the crowd. So, I ask again, you just wanted to make things worse?
 
It would have made it much better, our own sheriff said the driver should have shot half of those idiots

Nope. There wasn't likely a need to have 20 corpses. 7 would have dispersed the crowd. So, I ask again, you just wanted to make things worse?
 
Yep. There wasn't likely a need to have 20 corpses. 7 would have dispersed the crowd. So, I ask again, you just wanted to make things worse?

speculation by you, but false
 
Nope. There wasn't likely a need to have 20 corpses. 7 would have dispersed the crowd. So, I ask again, you just wanted to make things worse?

There is always a need and there will continue to be a need as long as liberal minded people side with the thugs over law abiding citizens.
 
There is always a need and there will continue to be a need as long as liberal minded people side with the thugs over law abiding citizens.

What the hell are you talking about? Slow down. Try to breath. And re- read for understanding.
 
Yep. There wasn't likely a need to have 20 corpses. 7 would have dispersed the crowd. So, I ask again, you just wanted to make things worse?

20 less assholes is a better scenario than 7 less assholes.
 
What the hell are you talking about? Slow down. Try to breath. And re- read for understanding.

why do you pretend that everyone who doesn't buy into your anti gun, anti self defense nonsense is either

1) hysterical

2) out of control

3) or irrational

when your posts on this subject are devoid of logic and have no relationship to even the most tenuous of facts?
 
why do you pretend that everyone who doesn't buy into your anti gun, anti self defense nonsense is either

1) hysterical

2) out of control

3) or irrational

when your posts on this subject are devoid of logic and have no relationship to even the most tenuous of facts?

No where have I said I was opposed to self defense. Quite the opposite actually. I'm not sure why you argue things not said, but ignore what was said.

Try again.
 
Back
Top Bottom