• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

School shooting this morning . . .

I don't understand why this is still being debated in breaking news....
 
The idiocy mounts. YOu just cannot understand that if the Hughes Amendment is proper and constitutional-its application to semi autos would be just as proper. You might claim to have a FFL but you obviously have proven very little understanding of constitutional law and the concept of precedent

You have proven to be a clueless ambulance chaser with nothing better to do that be contrary and annoying. But you are correct about one thing - your idiocy continues to mount.
 
True, but there is the reality of the numbers. How many schools? How many students? How many teachers? Now, how many have been shot at school by some crazed maniac?
I really dont think a military style lockdown of schools is justified at this point.

The day it's your or my kid; then the lockdown needed to have already happened. I read there have been four massacres just in the past few weeks. At some point enough has to be enough. Honestly, enough needed to be enough after Columbine. Nobody did much of anything, and along came Sandy Hook. I'm not one for believing in zombie apocalypses and times of anarchy; but I tell all my friends to "buy guns and gold, b*tches".
 
I don't understand why this is still being debated in breaking news....

My guess? Some scrub that thinks he is a lawyer didn't get enough love growing up.
 
My guess? Some scrub that thinks he is a lawyer didn't get enough love growing up.
Nah, it spiraled into a discussion of the 2nd A, then into a discussion about whether inalienable rights exist or not, in relation to the former, and finally into it's current form, a discussion about the constitution in general and the 2nd A in semi-particular.


Or something like that...
 
Back
Top Bottom