• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Republican civil war is just getting started

If we wanted a civil war II it would be easy....

We're not exactly a communist nation and those that would spir such a problem would be takers ara than patriots....

The military will NOT defend "progressives"

It be an epic slaughter.....














































w
 
Last edited:
I wish I could bookmark threads like this. When Obamacare begins to implode and and Christie wins the White House it will be fun to find out what happened to the people who were so sure it was all over for the GOP. Probably be in hiding by then, huh?
Christie wins the whitehouse? Only if he runs as an independent. There is no way that Christie gets the nomination in todays wacko GOP.
 
It certainly would be over a lot faster,

You think your friends and family will fight against you? while killing their oath?


Yeah only you wish......
 
The problem is the Tea Party movement was never about that. It was a direct reaction to Obama's election. They had no problem with growing debt for 30 years. They suddenly have a problem with it when Obama gets elected.

I find it hilarious that the Tea Party claims to be about "fiscal responsibility" and yet the area their candidates mostly all agree on is social conservatism. ANy time a Tea Partier starts talking about how they are about this and that, just point them to the candidates they choose to align themselves to.
 
You think your friends and family will fight against you? while killing their oath?


Yeah only you wish......

What on earth are you talking about?
 
how so? Please explain?

Quite simple. Those folks in the 'red' areas of the map discontinue to supply foodstuffs to those in the 'blue' areas of the map. We know these 'blue' areas to be metro areas where food production is limited at best. Once the 'micro-society breakdown' occurs (within a week) due to widespread urban hunger 'city folks' will be killin' each other. We in the rural 'red' areas will then defend ourselves (as we are the knuckle-dragging, gun toten', bible thumpers) from those wondering bands who 'escape' from these metro's. In a few weeks the 'enemy' will succumb/submit from starvation...very few shots will need be fired.

Also note the red/blue area relationship is pretty consistent throughout all the states...so this won't be a north/south thing.
 
I find it hilarious that the Tea Party claims to be about "fiscal responsibility" and yet the area their candidates mostly all agree on is social conservatism. ANy time a Tea Partier starts talking about how they are about this and that, just point them to the candidates they choose to align themselves to.


Yeah I find it funny that you believe you can pull a Janet Reno... while degrading the US Constitution or better yet the Bill or Rights.
 
Yes we would be doing better without the brinksmanship and sequester cuts. Most Congress's would have passed a job stimulus bill too with unemployment so high. Reagan spent his way out of his recession but not Obama. The "beast has been starved".


There have been three stimulus measures inacted since Obama's coronation and they did absolutely nothing, except to put us deeper in debt.

You are in denial if you don't see that what the Republicans are doing is trying to stunt our growth and keep deficits and unemployment high.

You mean like shutting down drilling, coal mines and slowing down the Keystone pipeline? Oh, wait, that's the Democrats that are doing all that...LOL!!!!
 
I can't help it if you don't know where the US lies on the actual political spectrum, but our most liberal President is kind of a toss up between Lincoln and Washington.

Lincoln was a racist, who was afraid that free blacks would cause a mongrolization of the races in America and Washington owned slaves.



Historians disagree as to which was the most liberal in their time, Obama isn't even on the radar.

I would LOVE to see some links! Can't wait to see what nimrod, so-called historian considers Lincoln, or Washington a Leftist.
 
That too is being talked about.

I bet it is! Even Obama is smart enough to know that if people get hounded by the IRS/Gestapo, that there will be a huge and probably violent backlash.
 
The Nazis had, "some positive effect", too. However just having, "some positive effect", doesn't necessarily mean success.
Goes Godwin on an effort to prop up a struggling economy with temporary spending measures and tax breaks. That's a new one.

You know whose name also started with an A, apdst?

That's right, Hitler.
 
Quite simple. Those folks in the 'red' areas of the map discontinue to supply foodstuffs to those in the 'blue' areas of the map. We know these 'blue' areas to be metro areas where food production is limited at best. Once the 'micro-society breakdown' occurs (within a week) due to widespread urban hunger 'city folks' will be killin' each other. We in the rural 'red' areas will then defend ourselves (as we are the knuckle-dragging, gun toten', bible thumpers) from those wondering bands who 'escape' from these metro's. In a few weeks the 'enemy' will succumb/submit from starvation...very few shots will need be fired.

Also note the red/blue area relationship is pretty consistent throughout all the states...so this won't be a north/south thing.
They can't win on ideas so they're planning the violence.
 
Goes Godwin on an effort to prop up a struggling economy with temporary spending measures and tax breaks. That's a new one.

You know whose name also started with an A, apdst?

That's right, Hitler.

That's all the argument you can summon? Color me surprised!

The only bigger surprise would be that you didn't call me a racist.

BTW, you need to do some research and see what, "Godwin", really means. I didn't meet that standard and you're just mad because history isn't on your side.
 
Lincoln's early adult days in your Louisiana taught him to hate slavery..
Lincoln was a racist, who was afraid that free blacks
would cause a mongrolization of the races in America and Washington owned slaves.
Lincoln promised no more Missouri Compromises and Kansas/Nebraska acts if elected, thus the firing on fort Sumter..
he even propose to let your state keep its slaves if that wouldn't cause a Civil War .
 
Quite simple. Those folks in the 'red' areas of the map discontinue to supply foodstuffs to those in the 'blue' areas of the map. We know these 'blue' areas to be metro areas where food production is limited at best. Once the 'micro-society breakdown' occurs (within a week) due to widespread urban hunger 'city folks' will be killin' each other. We in the rural 'red' areas will then defend ourselves (as we are the knuckle-dragging, gun toten', bible thumpers) from those wondering bands who 'escape' from these metro's. In a few weeks the 'enemy' will succumb/submit from starvation...very few shots will need be fired.

Also note the red/blue area relationship is pretty consistent throughout all the states...so this won't be a north/south thing.

Right wing murder fantasies can be entertaining as well as disturbing.

But they are pure fantasy.
 
Lincoln and Roosevelt made it to Mount Rushmore..
After the Monument was sculpted, who would you add in the 20th century??
The only bigger surprise would be that you didn't call me a racist.
That is supposed to be a no-no on DP..
you're just mad because history isn't on your side.
When you're team is losing the political debate, go back to Rumsfeldesque Revision .
 
Lincoln's early adult days in your Louisiana taught him to hate slavery..

Lincoln promised no more Missouri Compromises and Kansas/Nebraska acts if elected, thus the firing on fort Sumter..
he even propose to let your state keep its slaves if that wouldn't cause a Civil War .

I never said that Lincoln supported slavery. Did I? Do try and keep up.

What I said, was that Lincoln was a racist.

Lincoln would NEVER survive in today's political climate. The Libbos would go ape ****!

I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is physical difference between the two which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position.

Top 5 racist quotes by Abraham Lincoln | IGN Boards
 
If we wanted a civil war II it would be easy....

We're not exactly a communist nation and those that would spir such a problem would be takers ara than patriots....

The military will NOT defend "progressives"

It be an epic slaughter.....

The real tea party agenda, in all its glory
 
Back
Top Bottom