You're not making sense. When the system is working properly, the cashier can reference the available balance. Hence it operates like a gift card and not your earlier comparison to a check or banking card. When the system went faulty, the cards were showing an unlimited balance. Walmart staff correctly recognized this as a failure in the system and contacted corporate.
You claimed this justified walmart facilitating charges to these accounts because it was not their responsibility. I pointed out this was helping to facilitate the crime, because Walmart had working knowledge of the system, showed they were aware that it was not working properly. And in similar circumstances involving a bank, per your previous examples, would also be liable. Being that they tried to knowingly exploit a system error for personal benefit, just like the welfare moops.
1) No, I keep pointing out walmart knew the system wasn't working properly, because anyone semi familier with the system knows EBT cards do not have an unlimited balance, and they contacted corporate about it.
2) No, I was pointing out they have access to the information on the card, like any other gift card system and that they can easily reference it. This was in response to you claiming walmart had no access to such information and could not know there was such an error (also ignoring the manager contacted corporate)
Go back and reread the discussion and familiarize yourself with the information available, as opposed to confusing yourself in an effort to justify the inherent contradictions on the point of personal responsibility and your various other positions here
After that, I'll be happy to continue this