• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans Lose Ground vs. Obama in the Shutdown Blame Game

LOL....you would have to be completely blind to "Conservatives" posting history to believe that he voted for GWB because he was the least horrible of a bad lot. I doubt there is anyone on this site (that is being honest) that doesn't recognize that are complete BS. Sorry....just calling it how it is.

How about it, Disney, who should a conservative have voted for in 2000 and 2004? I welcome your incredible insight and brilliance that we see in all your posts.
 
No...its more about being able to know Bull **** when you see it.

Yes, sure, and let me guess, you (liberals) know better than anyone else. But, of course. Now, just stay quiet on this, you are not helping yourself. We are dissecting something... something awful.
 
You really have to question the logic behind the GOP's behavior.

Have you read the 2013 GOP platform? Let me sum it up for you, "Obama Sucks". The GOP were behaving exactly as their voters demanded. The house republicans did their job. It isn't their fault that their electorate is full of morons. Morons merit representation too. GOP leaders represented their voters flawlessly. It wasn't about gaining anything. It was about doing what their boss told them to do. This should make us feel proud of our system of government. On the other side of the coin, we should be very ashamed of the American public. They got exactly what they asked for.

vasuderatorrent
 
So how'd that work out?

It didn't work out well because many like you ignored the results and focused on the media spin and liberal lies especially about Iraq. Bush lost the Congress in 2006 because of Iraq not because of the economy. I defy you to post the economic results prior to the 2006 elections to make your point?
 
Here's a quick quiz... out of Obama, Hitler, and Stalin... Which did not do this?

As the leader, declare that certain laws would no longer be enforced?
... decide that some groups would get special treatment and also not have some laws apply to them.
... use the power of government to persecute certain groups that he considered enemies.
... bypass other parts of government and grab more power to do what he wants to do, despite laws that prohibit that behavior.

I can add more, but by now, you've probably figured out that it is a trick question!
 
It didn't work out well because many like you ignored the results and focused on the media spin and liberal lies especially about Iraq. Bush lost the Congress in 2006 because of Iraq not because of the economy. I defy you to post the economic results prior to the 2006 elections to make your point?

You make a good point!

Aside from all the bad things that happened, everything that happened was good!
 
You make a good point!

Aside from all the bad things that happened, everything that happened was good!

Same challenge to you, show me the economic results from 2003 through 2006 and tell me what was bad in those results that led to the Democrat take over in Congress? Results don't matter to the "American Idol" crowd including you
 
Same challenge to you, show me the economic results from 2003 through 2006 and tell me what was bad in those results that led to the Democrat take over in Congress? Results don't matter to the "American Idol" crowd including you

Challenge? I AGREED WITH YOU!

Aside from the bad stuff, it was All Good!
 
Like most partisans, right and left you miss the point. I am not speaking for all independents, no one can speak for 100% of any group and independents are such a diverse group all one can do is get a feel about them, polls of course help. The thing that is happening is the reasons why, the wherefores, the blame, etc gets lost. Independents except a very few do not following the workings of Washington D.C. and the mundane workings of politics and government. What I am say, they can see the government is shut down, they heard of dire consequences of the debt ceiling not being raised. The know in their hearts and mind their government is not working the way it should. They may or may not know the reasons and may or may not know how party politics work. Most just vote for the a candidate and not a party. They see at the moment government is broke and want it fixed. It is quite simple.
I love how you start off the paragraph stating that you don't speak for independents......and then continue to speak for them (well apparently "not all" just excepting "a few"!). You see, I think you missed your point.....you don't speak for them....not even in the casual self denying manner you continue doing.

They aren't at the moment worried about the ACA, about sequester, about future debt, about what everyone on this site is so hot and bothered about. They at this moment do not care about any of this stuff, they just want government to get back to work and how that happens, what one party gives and the other party takes is irrelavent to them at this moment. Get back to work government is what they are saying, to those in washington, get off your high horse and solve this thing.
And this self denied but continuing "I don't speak for all independents, but here is what they think" delusion continues...amazing!

now a month, six weeks, six months, the ACA or other political issues might become important to them, some will and some won't. But that is unimportant to them today, right now, at this moment. Getting the government back up running is. Do you understand?
Oh yes...I understand that your delusional belief that you have the pulse of independents in the US continues unabated, without seeing any of it hypocrisy or irony.

Not only that, but the 2 points I made, that you completely glossed over your statistical misrepresentations (177%!!!) and you failed to address how the POTUS is supposedly "messing with the lives of independents"....by fighting for HI access....which I am sure a number of them want and need....but then perhaps I am in error to speak....for that minority.

Sigh, carry on. You talk a lot....I just hoped you were going to say something.
 
Challenge? I AGREED WITH YOU!

Aside from the bad stuff, it was All Good!

I asked you to point out the bad stuff that led to a Democrat takeover of Congress in the 2006 elections. Seems that liberals want to hold Bush totally accountable for 2008 and ignore the fact that he was in office through the Clinton recession, 9/11, and a strong economy and job creation from 2003-2006 yet lost the election in 2006. I want a liberal to explain it.
 
Here's a quick quiz... out of Obama, Hitler, and Stalin... Which did not do this?

As the leader, declare that certain laws would no longer be enforced?
... decide that some groups would get special treatment and also not have some laws apply to them.
... use the power of government to persecute certain groups that he considered enemies.
... bypass other parts of government and grab more power to do what he wants to do, despite laws that prohibit that behavior.

I can add more, but by now, you've probably figured out that it is a trick question!

Very interesting reference site to understand the liberal agenda.

Discover the Networks
 
I love how you start off the paragraph stating that you don't speak for independents......and then continue to speak for them (well apparently "not all" just excepting "a few"!). You see, I think you missed your point.....you don't speak for them....not even in the casual self denying manner you continue doing.

And this self denied but continuing "I don't speak for all independents, but here is what they think" delusion continues...amazing!

Oh yes...I understand that your delusional belief that you have the pulse of independents in the US continues unabated, without seeing any of it hypocrisy or irony.

Not only that, but the 2 points I made, that you completely glossed over your statistical misrepresentations (177%!!!) and you failed to address how the POTUS is supposedly "messing with the lives of independents"....by fighting for HI access....which I am sure a number of them want and need....but then perhaps I am in error to speak....for that minority.

Sigh, carry on. You talk a lot....I just hoped you were going to say something.

I have made it a habit of studying independents for the last 20 plus years. After all we all know how Republicans and Democrats will vote whose side of an issue they will take. Now indpendents can be all over the place and they switch sides, going from one party to the other and sometimes back again. For a lot of my information I rely on polls, there is a ton of information insides these polls if one is brave enough to do a little research. But as I said that is my hobby.

On the ACA, RCP has the average of 6 polls and you can check it out, it is 38.3 in favor, 48.8 against. But this is for all Americans, Republicans, Democrats and Independents. SO how do independents really feel about the ACA, I went inside the polls so kindly provided by RCP,. They hold a wealth of information if one is politically inclined and doesn't just take what the RNC or the DNC as gospel. Here are 3 questions and answers in one of those polls about the ACA broken down by party plus Independents.

Health care: Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing on this issue?
Approve Dem 79% Rep 12% Ind 36%
Disapprove Dem 18% Rep 85% Ind 57%
Don't know Dem 3% Rep 3% Ind 7%

Which one of the following comes closest to what you would like to see lawmakers do with the new health care law -- would you like lawmakers to repeal the law entirely, repeal parts of the law, expand the law, or leave it as is?
Repeal it entirely Dem 8% Rep 53% Ind 30%
Repeal parts of the law Den 20% Rep 26% Ind 30%
Expand it Dem 24% Rep 6% Ind 16%
Leave it as is Dem 45% Rep 11% Ind
(Don't know) Dem 4% Rep 4% Ind7%


Which do you think would be better for you and your family -- the new health care system or the system that was in place before the new health care law?
The new health care system Dem 60% Rep 12% Ind 34%
System that was in place Dem 27% Rep 80% Ind 48%
(Don't know) Dem 13% Rep 8% Ind 18%

Now you can look at the number and I am pretty sure you can decide how independents view the ACA as of the date of the poll which was 7 Oct 2013.

Now there are around 40 questions they asked concerning who is to blame for the shut down, Presidents Obama approval rating, how do you view Boehner, Cruz, Reid, both political parties, even on baseball and football. So I look at the inside of these polls and I can be fairly certain to with a plus or minus of 3 points, the polls error margin on how independents view all these different subject. You can or could do the same instead of just spouting opinions. Rack me over the coals if that makes you feel good, I don't mind. But I do know in my mind that be researching and going inside all these different polls one can get a pretty good feel as to where independents stand on any given subject. Being there are six such polls, I feel confident in saying the majority of independents are against the ACA as you can easily see or perhaps determine from the polling results.

Yes all 177% of me.
 
Watching FOX by-lines on mute--
Are they cheering for the failure of ACA--
Imagine the many millions being spent to obstruct the law being used the 'American' way--
 
I have made it a habit of studying independents for the last 20 plus years.
Well there you go, apparently you do speak for them, except for those you dont speak for....


Health care: Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing on this issue?
Approve Dem 79% Rep 12% Ind 36%
Disapprove Dem 18% Rep 85% Ind 57%
Don't know Dem 3% Rep 3% Ind 7%

Which one of the following comes closest to what you would like to see lawmakers do with the new health care law -- would you like lawmakers to repeal the law entirely, repeal parts of the law, expand the law, or leave it as is?
Repeal it entirely Dem 8% Rep 53% Ind 30%
Repeal parts of the law Den 20% Rep 26% Ind 30%
Expand it Dem 24% Rep 6% Ind 16%
Leave it as is Dem 45% Rep 11% Ind
(Don't know) Dem 4% Rep 4% Ind7%


Which do you think would be better for you and your family -- the new health care system or the system that was in place before the new health care law?
The new health care system Dem 60% Rep 12% Ind 34%
System that was in place Dem 27% Rep 80% Ind 48%
(Don't know) Dem 13% Rep 8% Ind 18%

Now you can look at the number and I am pretty sure you can decide how independents view the ACA as of the date of the poll which was 7 Oct 2013.

Yes all 177% of me.
I am still waiting for your explanation of the 177% you posted earlier....these are your words:

A CNN/ORC poll of independents and independents only showed 60% angry at the Republican Congress, 59% angry at the Democrats in congress and 58% angry at President Obama.
You are still glossing over the misrepresentation of the data, you cannot have 177%.

Try again.
 
Watching FOX by-lines on mute--
Are they cheering for the failure of ACA--
Imagine the many millions being spent to obstruct the law being used the 'American' way--

Now how dare the Representatives of the people obstruct a law that 38% of the people support!! The question should be why are taxpayer dollars being spent on a social program that most of the country doesn't want?
 
Forbes, H. Cain, and now 8th-grade teacher's profanity-laced tape--blocked out her face, but easy to show it is Black..rare insight from FOX..
Now how dare the Representatives of the people obstruct a law that 38% of the people support!!
good move by me today to mute and watch FOX, so I see where you get your stuff..but wait, you don't watch FOX..get up earlier for Lush??
The question should be why are taxpayer dollars being spent on a social program that most of the country doesn't want?
Why should tax dollars be spent on anything, right ?
 
Forbes, H. Cain, and now 8th-grade teacher's profanity-laced tape--blocked out her face, but easy to show it is Black..rare insight from FOX..good move by me today to mute and watch FOX, so I see where you get your stuff..but wait, you don't watch FOX..get up earlier for Lush??Why should tax dollars be spent on anything, right ?

Federal Social spending isn't the role of the Federal Govt. but it is in the liberal world where we have a massive central govt. providing for everything people like you need and want
 
Well there you go, apparently you do speak for them, except for those you dont speak for....


I am still waiting for your explanation of the 177% you posted earlier....these are your words:

You are still glossing over the misrepresentation of the data, you cannot have 177%.

Try again.

Oh I see, okay somehow my fingers typed faster than my mind. I actually thought you were for real but you are fixated on a typo. I agree you cannot have 177% where ever I typed that, Happy? But that does not take away from my main point, if one follows the polls and looks inside them one can find out how the majority of Republicans, Democrats and Independents feel about a certain subject. All I can do is point out the independent view, you can do with it what you like. But in denying it when the facts and figures are there, not only in one poll but six, seems like someone living in a fantasy world. Welcome to Disney Land my friend.
 
I asked you to point out the bad stuff that led to a Democrat takeover of Congress in the 2006 elections. Seems that liberals want to hold Bush totally accountable for 2008 and ignore the fact that he was in office through the Clinton recession, 9/11, and a strong economy and job creation from 2003-2006 yet lost the election in 2006. I want a liberal to explain it.

Strong GOVERMENT job creation. Private sector job creation kind of sucked under Bush.
 
Oh I see, okay somehow my fingers typed faster than my mind. I actually thought you were for real but you are fixated on a typo. I agree you cannot have 177% where ever I typed that, Happy? But that does not take away from my main point, if one follows the polls and looks inside them one can find out how the majority of Republicans, Democrats and Independents feel about a certain subject. All I can do is point out the independent view, you can do with it what you like. But in denying it when the facts and figures are there, not only in one poll but six, seems like someone living in a fantasy world. Welcome to Disney Land my friend.
Um, I'm denying that you know as much as you want let on.....and you STILL have not corrected your error.....WHILE you claim I am not living in realty....because I challenge your faulty data....going on 3 pages now.

FFS.
 
Do you believe that the Interstates should be left to disrepair, with bridges falling in..
Why did Boehner's caucus stab him in the back on his TRAN. bill and Farm bill, when he tried to put them on the floor..
Federal Social spending isn't the role of the Federal Govt. but it is in the liberal world where we have a massive central govt. providing for everything people like you need and want
Such as the very necessary project on the Ohio River..
 
Um, I'm denying that you know as much as you want let on.....and you STILL have not corrected your error.....WHILE you claim I am not living in realty....because I challenge your faulty data....going on 3 pages now.

FFS.

Forget it guy, if a typo causes you glee, so be it. I admit I made a typing mistake and when you type as many numbers as I do that will happen. I cede to your intellectial powers. It is time to move on. Bye.
 
Really? cite your source between 2003-2007, BLS disagrees with you

I seem to remember Bush being President from January 2001 - January 2009. 2003-2007 is HALF of his presidency. That's a great way to be taken seriously!

Let me rewrite your post for you. Private sector job creation was great under Bush in all of the months that it was great. Please don’t talk about the other half.
 
Back
Top Bottom