- Joined
- Apr 20, 2013
- Messages
- 12,331
- Reaction score
- 1,941
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Run? Hide? Do you take me for a lib, do you? That is just plain insulting then. :lamo
Well, lets just see here…
Second position:TENANT MUST DO AS OWNER INSTUCTS, EVACUATE IF TOLD TO DO SO.
Third position: OH YEAH, TENANT DOES HAVE THE RIGHT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT OF THE PROPERTY AND SAID TENANT CAN IGNORE INSTRUCTIONS TO EVACUATE THE PREMISE.
:yt
That help you out your understanding/memory of events any?
I mean, after getting spanked on the other thread about the Hannity-Pascrell subsidies wager/ non wager, perhaps you should just leave well enough alone…
One could be a little more sympathetic in the case of the other thread where one may not be able to closely follow what two other people on video are saying, perhaps cannot understand the larger concepts of Congress, the OPM and Obama with Obamacare added to the nuance of an amendment added by a Republican to make Congress subject to its own laws...and then the mad scramble to make compensation to congress and staff where many of the rest of us do not get similarly compensated…
But surely one should be able to understand what oneself wrote…
Oh and, 0 for 2 is not a particularly good average, yanno?
Well, lets just see here…
if the property owner tells you to close the property, close the property
then recover what you would have earned thru the courts
winning a contract dispute with the federal government is always an enriching proposition
no. the landlord could tell the tenant to vacate
and the tenant would have to vacate
and then seek compensation via the courts
you are correct. unless the contract indicates otherwise, the tenant is entitled to quiet enjoyment of the property
and barring any contract language to the contrary, the tenant's decision to remain open is his to make
but being able to do something does not make it smart to do something
which is something i do not expect you to understand
First postion: DO AS THE PROPERTY OWNER INSTUCTS, CLOSE THE PROPERTY.please point out any posts in which what i presented is at odds with the more current post
accept the challenge
dont run and hide from it
Second position:TENANT MUST DO AS OWNER INSTUCTS, EVACUATE IF TOLD TO DO SO.
Third position: OH YEAH, TENANT DOES HAVE THE RIGHT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT OF THE PROPERTY AND SAID TENANT CAN IGNORE INSTRUCTIONS TO EVACUATE THE PREMISE.
:yt
That help you out your understanding/memory of events any?
I mean, after getting spanked on the other thread about the Hannity-Pascrell subsidies wager/ non wager, perhaps you should just leave well enough alone…
One could be a little more sympathetic in the case of the other thread where one may not be able to closely follow what two other people on video are saying, perhaps cannot understand the larger concepts of Congress, the OPM and Obama with Obamacare added to the nuance of an amendment added by a Republican to make Congress subject to its own laws...and then the mad scramble to make compensation to congress and staff where many of the rest of us do not get similarly compensated…
But surely one should be able to understand what oneself wrote…
Oh and, 0 for 2 is not a particularly good average, yanno?