• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Help kids with cancer? Reid asks: 'Why would we want to do that?'[W:97]

poweRob said:
Your denial is too deep. You get the exact video proof you asked for and its still not enough. I think we are done here.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't trust anything from Media Matters regardless of the outlet...
 
AlabamaPaul said:
I wouldn't trust anything from Media Matters regardless of the outlet...
Click to expand...

Doood, you don't even trust your own eyes. When that happens to someone, there's no helping that person remove their gargantuan partisan blinders.

First you didn't believe it because you didn't see the video.

I provided a video and you blamed it on tv resolution

I qusetioned that and you changed your story to attacking the source as doctoring the story on Fox doctoring photos.

You are such a Fox loyalist that you won't believe anything that you see.

Reality is now beyond even surgery's help.
 
just to make a point--as I type, I see 6 members but only 5 names listed--why do members hide??
 
poweRob said:
Doood, you don't even trust your own eyes. When that happens to someone, there's no helping that person remove their gargantuan partisan blinders.
Click to expand...

But he's liberal.
 
poweRob said:
Doood, you don't even trust your own eyes. When that happens to someone, there's no helping that person remove their gargantuan partisan blinders.
Click to expand...

Dick, when an outlet has a mission to bring down an outlet, why would anyone trust them...
 
Once all of America realizes that Reid is not the monster here, and that day is closer than ever, Repubs really are in trouble.
poweRob said:
And I backed up mine whole hog video and all. Good luck disproving that.
Click to expand...
 
NIMBY said:
Once all of America realizes that Reid is not the monster here, and that day is closer than ever, Repubs really are in trouble.
Click to expand...

Perhaps.... but Reid is still a gutless prick IMO who needs to go and be replaced by anything with a spine.
 
poweRob said:
Doood, you don't even trust your own eyes. When that happens to someone, there's no helping that person remove their gargantuan partisan blinders.

First you didn't believe it because you didn't see the video.

I provided a video and you blamed it on tv resolution

I qusetioned that and you changed your story to attacking the source as doctoring the story on Fox doctoring photos.

You are such a Fox loyalist that you won't believe anything that you see.

Reality is now beyond even surgery's help.
Click to expand...

mean while back to the ranch back to the subject of this thread. before you tried to distract from it that you are trying to derail because you have no argument or rebuttal what Reid said are you trying to claim that fox altered the vid like you are feebly trying to imply
 
trfjr said:
mean while back to the ranch back to the subject of this thread. before you tried to distract from it that you are trying to derail because you have no argument or rebuttal what Reid said are you trying to claim that fox altered the vid like you are feebly trying to imply
Click to expand...

Fiddytree showed you. Go reread his posts and then continue to deny to yourself reality actually happened.
 
Looks like your resident lefty lovers can't handle the foot in mouth of one of their dictators men very well. This is the same loser human that often tells us how much the Republicans want to kill and destroy people but when he sticks his foot in mouth suddenly its just "faux news"


trfjr said:
Help kids with cancer? Reid asks: 'Why would we want to do that?' | Fox News

so the truth comes out the democrats deliberately and purposely hurting the American public to cause as much pain and even death for political gain "my way or the high way even if it kills children"
Click to expand...
 
Would you prefer McConnell running the Senate and Cruz running both Chambers?
With all of this high tension, I'm actually afraid one of the older guys might have a heart attack.
And you know what the TEAtards would say to that.
25 Senate Repubs did not filibuster but 0 did not vote for a clean CR.
poweRob said:
Perhaps.... but Reid is still a gutless prick IMO who needs to go and be replaced by anything with a spine.
Click to expand...
 
NIMBY said:
Would you prefer McConnell running the Senate and Cruz running both Chambers?
With all of this high tension, I'm actually afraid one of the older guys might have a heart attack.
And you know what the TEAtards would say to that.
25 Senate Repubs did not filibuster but 0 did not vote for a clean CR.
Click to expand...

I'd rather Bernie Sanders be leading the Senate. Or Elizabeth Warren. Someone who stands up strong.
 
In context, he said he had 1,100 people back at Nellis USAF base who needed help.
Should they all die for one child?
Why are Repubs playing games with mini-CRs when their nads are getting crushed in PR?
Would you say Reid was set up?
And Rinse Priebus using the Veterans with Bachmann and Steve King.
And Cruz with his Bataan death march remark.
How much lower do Repubs get to go?
I know the answer.
I'll be listening to Limbaugh and the loons on Beck and Fox tomorrow for Repub talking pts.
CalGun said:
Looks like your resident lefty lovers can't handle the foot in mouth of one of their dictators men very well. This is the same loser human that often tells us how much the Republicans want to kill and destroy people but when he sticks his foot in mouth suddenly its just "faux news"
Click to expand...
 
poweRob said:
I think Fiddytree handled all that crap rather well and yes... they did. They chopped the video to destroy context and demonize who they don't like. It's a loooooong pattern with Fox.
Click to expand...

the vid came from CNN I pulled it off you tube not Fox news
you are such an -----you make it very hard not to throw insults at you but dam
 
AlabamaPaul said:
These are stills, not the video as actually shown and analog TV as well... Are you for real?
Click to expand...

You do know that analog TV set was pure skeuomorphism, don't you? It wasn't actually an analog TV set they fed an image through. As horribly irritating as that is (I tended to shy away from CNN and watch Fox News instead because CNN likes to make us watch a guy play with a touch screen device instead of shooting us the feed directly), it is not a reason to doubt the imagery.

It's like this:

53bf727ed684d727988f7bfd2ff7800e.jpg


It doesn't actually do anything for you except it's supposed to remind you of your good ol' fashioned bookcase. They could have simply had a series of book covers or even text, but they decided to use this instead.

Many media outlets (including Glenn Beck back in the day) are guilty of using skeuomorphism with regard to analog TV sets. I really first noticed it big time when watching the Move-ON.org-financed documentary "Out Foxxed." It was meant to be a cutesy and homely way of giving us the clips, but it always strictly annoyed me.
 
Last edited:
trfjr said:
the vid came from CNN I pulled it off you tube not Fox news
you are such an -----you make it very hard not to throw insults at you but dam
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's why I criticized your use of the video. Instead of going by the clip you showed, you decided to still frame it with Fox's interesting characterization of the Q & A session.
 
All you have with seniority is Schumer and Durbin.
Sanders is an Independent and way too liberal and vulnerable.
He has some real problems in Vermont with cronyism, as most pols do in their own states.
Warren in time maybe.
She needs to do her great work now while she has the drive and spunk.
poweRob said:
I'd rather Bernie Sanders be leading the Senate. Or Elizabeth Warren. Someone who stands up strong.
Click to expand...
 
Fiddytree said:
Yeah, that's why I criticized your use of the video. Instead of going by the clip you showed, you decided to still frame it with Fox's interesting characterization of the Q & A session.
Click to expand...

what? there is no clip of it on the Fox news site im not sure what the hell you are talking about ive only posted one clip and it didn't come from Fox because there is no clip provided by Fox so how n the hell can you or others say fox edited a clip that doesn't exist on their site or anywhere provided by fox
 
Last edited:
trfjr said:
what? there is no clip of it on the Fox news site im not sure what the hell you are talking about ive only posted one clip and it didn't come from Fox because there is no clip provided by Fox
Click to expand...

Is there a reason why folks in this thread have a hard time reading and comprehending posts?

Did I say what we saw from Fox News was a video clip? No, I did not. I was obviously talking about how they framed the content of the Q&A session in the OP's linked article.
 
Fiddytree said:
Is there a reason why folks in this thread have a hard time reading and comprehending posts?

Did I say what we saw from Fox News was a video clip? No, I did not. I was obviously talking about how they framed the content of the Q&A session in the OP's linked article.
Click to expand...
because I will bet you most if not all didn't go to the site they just read the first paragraph I provided, because that is all im allowed to provide. if you have a problem with something taken out of context or I didn't provide the full picture that's not my dam fault. you need to take it up with the forum moderators for only allowing to provide the first paragraph of the article and the link. so don't you dare trying to give me a hard time for following the forum rules
 
trfjr said:
because I will bet you most if not all didn't go to the site they just read the first paragraph I provided, because that is all im allowed to provide.
Click to expand...

So that's why I discussed what was near the bottom of the article, right? You must have provided that in the OP too, right?

Oh that's right, you didn't. That would require me to click on the link, read the article, and then find out after Reid complains about being taken out of context do we get text that came from the Q & A session before the paragraph you linked.

Sorry, tf, your little tantrum there doesn't negate the fact that you're still wrong.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Attacking other posters instead of addressing the topic will result in thread bans and infractions. Be careful.
 
trfjr said:
the vid came from CNN I pulled it off you tube not Fox news
you are such an -----you make it very hard not to throw insults at you but dam
Click to expand...

There are places for that. This isn't it.
 
Fiddytree said:
So that's why I discussed what was near the bottom of the article, right? You must have provided that in the OP too, right?

Oh that's right, you didn't. That would require me to click on the link, read the article, and then find out after Reid complains about being taken out of context do we get text that came from the Q & A session before the paragraph you linked.

Sorry, tf, your little tantrum there doesn't negate the fact that you're still wrong.
Click to expand...

because im not allowed to. read the dam forum rules ive received infractions for posting more then the first paragraph
please can I have a moderator come to this thread and explain the rules to this _____
 
Helix said:
Moderator's Warning:
Attacking other posters instead of addressing the topic will result in thread bans and infractions. Be careful.
Click to expand...

can you please explain the rules why I only posted the first paragraph of the article and provided a link. they are calling me out for not giving the full picture they are trying to claim I was misleading and purposely being deceitful
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom