- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 44,814
- Reaction score
- 20,221
- Location
- A very blue state
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Some of these people here will go to any length.
You're right, but it's not the people you're thinking of.
Some of these people here will go to any length.
Sure... let's see:
There's photoshopping images of politicians they want to demonize:
Then there is the swapping of video footage to push the narrative that the Wisconsis union rally's were violent by showing rally footage from a California rally... No there was no disclaimer saying they did this... it was he palm trees that gave their lie away.
If you want blatant lying other than the ones that happen ever damn day there is this court case where they felt it important to legally win the right to lie.
If you want more evidence just turn on The Five or the morning idiots. They pull stuff right out of their ass and it's generally angry bullcrap they just make up.
So next time any of you Fox News lovers want to say "all media does that..." you have to go dig up this kind of **** I just posted above.
These are stills, not the video as actually shown and analog TV as well... Are you for real?
did or did he not say this "Why would we want to do that?" followed directly after the 2nd question "If you can help one child who has cancer, why wouldn't you do it?"Did you ever think it was odd that in the Youtube clip you provided, Reid doesn't say the "why would we do that?" line until 1:07 in a clip that lasted only until 1:14?
Meanwhile what he said from 17 seconds to 55 seconds in the clip does not show up in their piece until the bottom of the article?
God knows why you folks are being so dishonest here.
Yes, his immediate response was that it was picking and choosing what parts of government stay open and which do not, insinuating that they were not doing enough and that they were "obsessed" with Obamacare.
As Bash later pointed out to viewers, the President, Reid, and others ensured that military pay was reinstated, which put a dent in Reid's rhetoric, but established again that Democrats thought that Republican antics were not going far enough to restore the government to its operating capacity.
It doesn't matter. Harry Reid is a Democrat.
If he was caught red handed eating dead babies they'd blame it on Fox News
It doesn't matter. Harry Reid is a Democrat.
If he was caught red handed eating dead babies they'd blame it on Fox News
did or did he not say this "Why would we want to do that?" followed directly after the 2nd question "If you can help one child who has cancer, why wouldn't you do it?"
what difference is it what he said before the second question
did or did he not say this "Why would we want to do that?" followed directly after the 2nd question "If you can help one child who has cancer, why wouldn't you do it?"
what difference is it what he said before the second question
First he states that it was explained by Chuck Schumer and others.
Then he says this:
"What right did they have to pick and choose what parts of government can be funded. It's obvious what's going on here."
Then he discusses it being about Obamacare.
Then she reiterates again the question and then he finally says what Fox News apparently claimed he "immediately" said.
[video]http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoftv/2013/10/02/exp-bash-reid.cnn&iref=videosearch[/video]
These are stills, not the video as actually shown and analog TV as well... Are you for real?
did or did he not say this "Why would we want to do that?" followed directly after the 2nd question "If you can help one child who has cancer, why wouldn't you do it?"
what difference is it what he said before the second question
No, it's not.
You didn't even watch it then. Because at around 40 seconds in that video it shows the video segment of Fox & Friends where Steve Doocy broadcasts those images in his segment.
You are in deeeep denial and flat out lying to yourself if you believe you don't see that.
Who the hell said anything about a french story?
What a complete straw man you are fighting.
You didn't even watch it then. Because at around 40 seconds in that video it shows the video segment of Fox & Friends where Steve Doocy broadcasts those images in his segment.
You are in deeeep denial and flat out lying to yourself if you believe you don't see that.
IMO, Harry Reid is a PoS and needs to be booted out of office. Fox's deceptive lying bull**** isn't necessary, lacks morality and integrity in those who wish to call themselves journalists.
just proof that people will screen capture and photo shop Fox coverage and try to use it as evidence that fox lies
Actually, I did watch it several times. I only have HD TV's, and even on those, when I'm on the lower channels everything is distorted depending on my picture settings...
just proof that people will screen capture and photo shop Fox coverage and try to use it as evidence that fox lies
Interesting. Looks like the shots against Fox are the only defense for Reid. Seems like Fox was on point.eace
You going to do that? Really? You are going to say that it was natural tv distortion? A distortion where just those guys are distorted unintentionally while everything else looks fine?
You are saying this video did not happen?
I give you exactly what you ask for and you are still going to deny it. How bizzare people are.
are you trying to imply Fox did anything to the Harry Reid vid? is that your implication is that your point?
What would the benefit have been? Media Matters is well known for attempting to bring down those media outlets with whom they disagree...