• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pope Francis: Church can't 'interfere' with gays

Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps I missed this proof, link?

Perhaps you missed the explanation included in my comments. Now, we could get tedious and I could repost all the evidence that you have seen several times already... but we know you don't care to listen. You've seen the evidence. You choose to remain blind to it. You have your beliefs... beliefs which have no basis in evidence. I really don't care what you believe, david, but when you try to present them as facts, which they are not, you'll get confronted and proven wrong every time, either by me or by someone else.
 
Perhaps you missed the explanation included in my comments. Now, we could get tedious and I could repost all the evidence that you have seen several times already... but we know you don't care to listen. You've seen the evidence. You choose to remain blind to it. You have your beliefs... beliefs which have no basis in evidence. I really don't care what you believe, david, but when you try to present them as facts, which they are not, you'll get confronted and proven wrong every time, either by me or by someone else.

Still waiting on that proof.....
 
I asked you to show me where, you continue to refuse to do so.

I outlined the proof in my post. The proof has been shown to you REPEATEDLY. Like I said, we all know that you have no interest in proof.
 
Are you SERIOUSLY suggesting that there is no proof that Adam and Eve, and even the age of the Earth itself, are completely made up fables that were NEVER intended to be taken literally as fact?

Not suggesting, telling.
 
I outlined the proof in my post. The proof has been shown to you REPEATEDLY. Like I said, we all know that you have no interest in proof.

You listed talking points with nothing to back it up. I have interest in proof but since none exists you make these ridiculous claims rather than showing this earth shattering proof.
 
You listed talking points with nothing to back it up.

I listed proof. You have talking points. I have evidence. Define natural, david. Define normal... in a non-statistical sense, david. Refute archaeological and evolutionary evidence, david. You can't and haven't, each and every time you have been challenged. All you post are dumb extreme right wing talking points, or dumber biblical explanations that you claim are proof. The bible isn't proof, david, not when it comes to discussing science. This is why you always fail in these little encounters. You can't define terms and you use sources that don't apply.

I have interest in proof but since none exists you make these ridiculous claims rather than showing this earth shattering proof.

You have no interest in proof. If you did, you wouldn't post as you do.
 
I listed proof. You have talking points. I have evidence. Define natural, david. Define normal... in a non-statistical sense, david. Refute archaeological and evolutionary evidence, david. You can't and haven't, each and every time you have been challenged. All you post are dumb extreme right wing talking points, or dumber biblical explanations that you claim are proof. The bible isn't proof, david, not when it comes to discussing science. This is why you always fail in these little encounters. You can't define terms and you use sources that don't apply.



You have no interest in proof. If you did, you wouldn't post as you do.

Give me the evidence to refute and I will gladly do so. OR you can just keep dodging. :spin: :alert
 
And that "fact" of yours can be backed up with a very specific biblical source?

And you are saying there's no proof that your biblical source is wrong?

0 Proof that the Bible is wrong correct. And the age of the earth is based on genealogies.
 
10-20 thousand years.

Show scientific evidence. Oh, and since the bible isn't science, you can't use that. And remember the link that you posted a couple of weeks ago? You can't use that, either as it is not scientific. Show scientific evidence with research that follows the scientific model.

And every time you don't... and you and I both know that all you will post will not be scientific, you will dig yourself deeper in the hole that you are in, and people will just respond by saying "not scientific. Irrelevant."
 
Give me the evidence to refute and I will gladly do so. OR you can just keep dodging. :spin: :alert

Already posted it either here or elsewhere. You have failed in the past to refute it. Try this. Natural is defined as existing in nature. Homosexuality exists in nature. Therefore, homosexuality is natural.

Show us how you fumble this one.
 
Show scientific evidence. Oh, and since the bible isn't science, you can't use that. And remember the link that you posted a couple of weeks ago? You can't use that, either as it is not scientific. Show scientific evidence with research that follows the scientific model.

And every time you don't... and you and I both know that all you will post will not be scientific, you will dig yourself deeper in the hole that you are in, and people will just respond by saying "not scientific. Irrelevant."

I can't help it if you and others around here can't accept scientific evidence because it debunks your beliefs. And yes, that is the biased mod team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom