• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pope Francis: Church can't 'interfere' with gays

Status
Not open for further replies.
1) the bible wasn't written by god.

2) man might not be all knowing. But the Article is garbage, it doesn't even come close to disproving carbon dating and niether do you.

The only thing your proving at the moment is blind faith can be bad for you.

NYTimes also had an article about it. And yes, God DID in FACT write the Bible.
 

ostrich-head-in-sand.jpg
 
And yes, God DID in FACT write the Bible.

oh dear lord.

Ok well this is definitely Ptif219 all over again.

If you're this lost then I have no interest in this conversation.

Outright denying science in this fashion is not healthy.
 
That's always blown my mind. The catholic church wags its fingers at homosexuals, yet raping boys (a homosexual act) is completely ok. Maybe I missed that part in the bible.

Wow, that' causes your mind to be blown? That's kind of disturbing that you'd allow that to happen to your mind since there's been a multitude of instances where the Catholic Church "wags its fingers" at the notion of "raping boys". Such as this for example:

Link

The sexual abuse of children is not just a "heinous crime" but a "grave sin" that offends God and wounds human dignity, Pope Benedict XVI said Tuesday after a two-day meeting with Irish Catholic bishops at the Vatican.

It's funny...you bitch on and on about someone else possibly being bigoted, and then you make broad, ignorant, factually incorrect statements based on stereotypes. Truly, a wonderous comedy to behold.
 

So your proof that carbon dating is "proven" inaccurate is that it doesn't mesh with the Bible, and thereofre that proves it's wrong?

God damn...how about put the bible down for a few minutes and pick up a dictionary. You need to understand what the basic meaning of the words that you use are because you obviously don't have a working knowledge of what the definition of "Fact" or "proven".
 
So your proof that carbon dating is "proven" inaccurate is that it doesn't mesh with the Bible, and thereofre that proves it's wrong?

God damn...how about put the bible down for a few minutes and pick up a dictionary. You need to understand what the basic meaning of the words that you use are because you obviously don't have a working knowledge of what the definition of "Fact" or "proven".

The Bible IS fact.
 
oh dear lord.

Ok well this is definitely Ptif219 all over again.

If you're this lost then I have no interest in this conversation.

Outright denying science in this fashion is not healthy.

I don't deny science, just stupid false science.
 
The Bible IS fact.

No it isn't. It is your OPINION. If you cannot understand the difference between fact and opinion, maybe a debate board isn't for you and you might want to look up www.biblethumber.com instead. Otherwise, we will continue to laugh and call you out on your fallacies.
 
No it isn't. It is your OPINION. If you cannot understand the difference between fact and opinion, maybe a debate board isn't for you and you might want to look up www.biblethumber.com instead. Otherwise, we will continue to laugh and call you out on your fallacies.

You won't be laughing on judgement day.
 
You won't be laughing on judgement day.

Yes, I will because there isn't any judgement day. You can't prove there is either. BTW, I say God Damn it alot too.
 

!!!!!!!!

I can do punctuation too. Still waiting for you to prove that the bible was written by God. You of course say it is a fact so waiting on your proof.
 
No, it is your OPINION he did. Your faith is not fact.

TNE...the following might help you understand David's argument:

ReligiousCircularLogic.jpg


You can't penetrate this type of thinking...it's impossible :roll:
 
!!!!!!!!

I can do punctuation too. Still waiting for you to prove that the bible was written by God. You of course say it is a fact so waiting on your proof.

Why did you say you say GD a lot as well?
 
You're like a broken record, ignorantly repeating garbage you know nothing about

Jesus was a Rabbi. You know about them don't you? Jesus spoke on many occasions against fornication(s). One of those fornication(s) being homosexual sex. In other words Jesus didn't need to say the word homosexuality to have denounced filthy sodomy behavior. Anyone who tries to claim Jesus somehow would have approved of sodomy is an ignorant fool pushing some hardcore Gay Thumper propaganda. It's simply such a laughable premise that nothing more needs to be said.

God and Jesus are the same entity. The words God spoke in the Old Testament are the words of Jesus

You just don't fundamentally understand what Catholicism is. You're running around like a toddler in this thread looking foolish. Anyways, good luck convincing people Jesus thought sticking your pp in dirty holes was normal. :2wave:

Do you realize sodomy is defined as any sexual act that isn't strictly a human penis going into a human vagina? If you've ever gone down on someone, had someone go down on you, masturbated, pleasured anyone with your hand, or been pleasured by someone elses hand (or foot/cleavage/armpit/whatever), you've partaken in what is defined as "sodomy" and are (according to your argument) every bit the sinner as those dirty gays are in the eyes of Jesus.
 
Do you realize sodomy is defined as any sexual act that isn't strictly a human penis going into a human vagina? If you've ever gone down on someone, had someone go down on you, masturbated, pleasured anyone with your hand, or been pleasured by someone elses hand (or foot/cleavage/armpit/whatever), you've partaken in what is defined as "sodomy" and are (according to your argument) every bit the sinner as those dirty gays are in the eyes of Jesus.

Where in the world did you get that definition? Source?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom