• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran: We will never develop nuclear weapons

You would know when a person is following right wing propaganda. That's all you know how to post.

That's what I was thinking and its an admission that right wing PROPAGANDA should be followed. What ever happened to truth.
 
Funny how you put anti-semitism on liberals. You know like Ginsburg, Alinsky...people like that. Jewish people themselves seem to disagree:

Jewish Vote Goes 69 Percent For Barack Obama: Exit Polls

I never mentioned anything negative about either about either Ginsberg or Alinsky, or their being Jews.

But yes, why Jews vote for Obama, when they are among the best educated of the electorate, is a vexing question that many Jews are also asking themselves.
 
That's what I was thinking and its an admission that right wing PROPAGANDA should be followed. What ever happened to truth.

The truth?? Aren't you the one who gave a like to the Rigoberta Menchu propaganda and claimed that the US started a war on Muslims???
 
The truth?? Aren't you the one who gave a like to the Rigoberta Menchu propaganda and claimed that the US started a war on Muslims???

Yes about a hundred years ago.
 
No I don't. But it's funny how you can insult a whole region of the world, but if I were to imply that people in Arkansas were inbred rednecks, the same people jump down my throat. It's the same sort of BS statement, but as long as a righty says it about Musilms it's OK.

So, you have no concern for truth or equitability.

Duly noted.
 
What are you taking tips from Bronson now?

It isn't my problem that you aren't honest enough to admit that the consanguinity rates of Arkansas and anywhere in the Muslim middle east are so dissimilar that any attempt to equate the two is the product of an agenda too underhanded to be considered honorable.

This isn't a "right wing" propaganda vs "left wing propaganda" issue. It is an issue of honesty, clarity and the ability to look at statistics with an open mind rather than one predetermined to act as a dishonest apologist.
 
Hardly. It was a question that would expose the disgusting ideology that is liberal progressivism. You won't answer because of that, you can't answer because of that. Which is why I hold that most liberal progressives are really just liars, and generally cowards, afraid to be honest.

Excuse me?

Please correct me if I am wrong, but this started out with myself replying to this comment
Because for thousands of years, we've gotten nothing but truth, integrity, and peace from this refined, sophisticated, and exemplary region of the earth.
. Now I simply said that in Ancient Persia (which was thousands of years ago) it was considered one of the most heinous crimes to tell a lie, and that for a pretty fair period of time Persia, had a more refined culture than that of Europe.

You then asked me to define the term "Taq'qya" Taqiyya is a practice in which Shi'a Muslims lie about their faith in order to avoid persecution and/or aggression towards them.
The problem with you having me define this is that it does not represent Ancient Persia. Yes indeed Iran is Shi'a Muslim today, however Ancient Persia was Zoroastrian.

Hence it is not relevant to my statement.

So where the hell does "The disgusting theory of Liberal Progressivism" come into play in any of this?
 
They do when they are under a very real threat of being bombed by Israel.

Why would Israel bomb a purely civilian site that would be constantly inspected and shown to be clean? As long as they don't pull the Osirak kind of verification (aka, little), the entire world would have access to verify Iran's behavior.

Go ahead and provide your examples. Let's talk specifics.

Which specifics? Like how Israel pretended facilities doing nuclear work didn't exist? How they put in fake walls during inspections? How they tossed out inspectors?

South Korean nuclear research programs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tell me how the Iranian program resembles the Argentina program. We know the Argentina program is civilian only.

Whether or not they are covered in sanctions currently extant is completely irrelevant. Regardless, this is really just irrelevant to the discussion.

Not at all. If Iran was serious about civilian only, they could have saved billions in direct costs and billions from sanctions if they simply bought the fuel and shipped out the waste. That's how everyone else does it. The costs otherwise make it uncompetitive against other forms of electrical generation. Having to run your own enrichment program is horribly expensive. It's so much easier just to buy the fuel.
 
Back
Top Bottom