Then just explain it to me.
1) If you mean the stolen guns: No, something accounting for 10-15% of the illegal market does not suggest it can fulfill the demand of that entire market, nor would it suggest that it's comparable in scope to the current legal market. Also, no one suggested an illegal market didn't exist
2) If you mean the guns that are not stolen:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...en-us-navy-yard-w-69-a-50.html#post1062331069
- " the links from you and dittohead paint the issue as mainly being dependent on weak regulations fueling legal, though questionable, transactions. So, again, as an argument that easily accessible black market guns are the consequence of heavy regulation (which was the argument I was addressing) it leaves something to be desired"
1) So to avert away from the people trying to mindlessly blame guns you want to mindlessly blame video games and medications?
2) Unfortunately attacking them, their motives, and trying to generate your own diversion issues isn't going to make their arguments go the way of the dodo. You'll need to actually address those arguments. And unfortunately that isn't accomplished by tossing around slogans and making various stupid arguments like "gun laws don't impact availability" and "knives are more deadly than guns".
All those do is paint the arguer as an idiot and allows him to serve as a useful target for anti-gun right advocates