• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Syria 'welcomes' proposal to hand over control of chemical weapons [W:122]

"Big Eddie " Schultz is knocking it out of the park right now. Repubs are listening to their constituents? What a joke. How about 91% of Americans supporting Toomey/Manchin? Their list of ignoring public opinion is endless. They are treasonous saboteurs and have taken it to the worst level with Syria.
More Contorted delusions???

Just a few days ago the Cons were making references to WWI and now.
Just a few days ago Cons were saying Putin would fight us.
Just a few days ago Cons claimed Assad would launch a regional war rather than give in.

If I'm drinking kool aid Cons are drinking hard liquor... :lamo
 
More Contorted delusions???

Just a few days ago the Cons were making references to WWI and now.
Just a few days ago Cons were saying Putin would fight us.
Just a few days ago Cons claimed Assad would launch a regional war rather than give in.

If I'm drinking kool aid Cons are drinking hard liquor... :lamo

Days ago, shmays ago. Hell, days ago chairman O was ready to rain down hellfire..today? Not so much..his daddy, Putin told him to settle down, and like good weakling he complied...
 
Days ago, shmays ago. Hell, days ago chairman O was ready to rain down hellfire..today? Not so much..his daddy, Putin told him to settle down, and like good weakling he complied...

Heya JMac. :2wave: I thought he was playing, like a Good Neighbor.....But telling us State-Farm was there. :lol:
 
Days ago, shmays ago. Hell, days ago chairman O was ready to rain down hellfire..today? Not so much..his daddy, Putin told him to settle down, and like good weakling he complied...

LMAO, ok now I know it is the hard liquor!

Cons in here were so wrong on so much that the only thing some can do now is pretend the past doesn't matter.

I can tell when Cons are desperate- they use increasing shrill terms for our democratically elected President. Fact is President Obama prepared to use missiles. Russia tried to sound all tough in 'defense' of Syria. Obama moves a Carrier battle Group closer and suddenly Putin is Monty Hall and it's time to play 'Let's Make a Deal'! :mrgreen:

It seems as if the Cons are sad there won't be a missile strike. Sounds like the Neo-Cons of Iraq. Only military force is strength. :doh

Forgot, one more Contortion- one group of Cons calls a limited missile strike Hellfire and another a meaningless face saving strike... kinda like the way off Con who claimed it was the start of WWIII just like WWI....
 
LMAO, ok now I know it is the hard liquor!

Cons in here were so wrong on so much that the only thing some can do now is pretend the past doesn't matter.

I can tell when Cons are desperate- they use increasing shrill terms for our democratically elected President. Fact is President Obama prepared to use missiles. Russia tried to sound all tough in 'defense' of Syria. Obama moves a Carrier battle Group closer and suddenly Putin is Monty Hall and it's time to play 'Let's Make a Deal'! :mrgreen:

It seems as if the Cons are sad there won't be a missile strike. Sounds like the Neo-Cons of Iraq. Only military force is strength. :doh

Wow, your analysis of how this unfolded is truly astounding and about what I would expect from a true believer...
 
Wow, your analysis of how this unfolded is truly astounding and about what I would expect from a true believer...

If 'true believer' means someone who doesn't do CONtortions to whine about a flash point being defused and hopefully the last of Chemical Weapons in a long and bloody Civil War, I proudly wear that badge along with MY scars from MY turn at military action.... :2wave:
 
If 'true believer' means someone who doesn't do CONtortions to whine about a flash point being defused and hopefully the last of Chemical Weapons in a long and bloody Civil War, I proudly wear that badge along with MY scars from MY turn at military action.... :2wave:

Yes, the CON is a dead giveaway of a follower who cannot look at the facts objectively...
 
Cons can keep repeating that until the cows come home but it ain't flying. Unlike BushII in Iraq, Obama listens to the other nations and folks at home.

But lets review. Russia blinked, Assad grasped, Obama is getting work done without sending thousands of Americans to their deaths.

I understand Cons are loath to see this anyway but the way they want to spin it. but the bottom line is even with no help from congress or Europe Obama is removing chemical weapons from the civil war.

Cons were so sure this was the start of WWIII

Cons were so sure this would help Sunni terrorists they refuse to see the Shiite terrorists on Assad's side.

Cons were calling planned limited missile strikes either 'war mongering' OR wussy 'face saving'

Cons want to say Obama wants a war to boost his poll numbers when he can't run again.

So it seems to me the Con POV has been so wrong, so long it is a wonder some continue to beat this horse.

What legacy the Cons have left this country is a deep fear of any military action in the world. We want fast clean wars. We got a hot mess with thousands of dead Americans a huge drain on our finances that gained us nothing and an Administration so focused on Iraq they refused to see the economy starting to collapse. Iraq exposed us as having a huge military that was so top heavy it couldn't sustain an operation that lasts longer than a woman's hair style.

A President well on his way to forcing a dictator to abandon a chemical weapon while fighting for his life WITHOUT killing thousands of American Soldiers...

That is a WIN

But do keep trying to force everything into the 'it's just like' mold. :roll:

The way I see it is that Putin saved a valued customer for its arms sales, made Obama look silly for not negotiating in the first place, Assad got the U.S. military off his ass and can now resume his business, aided by Russia's and Iran's conventional weapons, of killing any that oppose his rule. It will be interesting to see what the eventual fate of Syria's CWs is. Meanwhile Iran is getting ready to cross Obama's "red line", again with Putin calling the shots.
 
Yes, the CON is a dead giveaway of a follower who cannot look at the facts objectively...

Laffin, I can't help the FACT CON is short for CONservative. beats libtards, libbos and the other crap 'fair minded' CONS use. (and let's not mention 'Chairman', 'your boy', 'King', 'Kenyan' and the other crap CONS use.... )

Naw you 'fair minded' CONS just don't see both sides at all.... carry on with your CONvolutions... :peace
 
LMAO, ok now I know it is the hard liquor!

Cons in here were so wrong on so much that the only thing some can do now is pretend the past doesn't matter.

I can tell when Cons are desperate- they use increasing shrill terms for our democratically elected President. Fact is President Obama prepared to use missiles. Russia tried to sound all tough in 'defense' of Syria. Obama moves a Carrier battle Group closer and suddenly Putin is Monty Hall and it's time to play 'Let's Make a Deal'! :mrgreen:

It seems as if the Cons are sad there won't be a missile strike. Sounds like the Neo-Cons of Iraq. Only military force is strength. :doh

Forgot, one more Contortion- one group of Cons calls a limited missile strike Hellfire and another a meaningless face saving strike... kinda like the way off Con who claimed it was the start of WWIII just like WWI....

Well, I'll believe your take when it happens...so far, we've seen more turns than a mountain road from Obama. I think you place too much trust in the Russians..
 
Laffin, I can't help the FACT CON is short for CONservative. beats libtards, libbos and the other crap 'fair minded' CONS use. (and let's not mention 'Chairman', 'your boy', 'King', 'Kenyan' and the other crap CONS use.... )

Naw you 'fair minded' CONS just don't see both sides at all.... carry on with your CONvolutions... :peace

Yes, it appears you're only interested in insults and irrational defense, not a debate. Have a good evening...
 
The way I see it is that Putin saved a valued customer for its arms sales, made Obama look silly for not negotiating in the first place, Assad got the U.S. military off his ass and can now resume his business, aided by Russia's and Iran's conventional weapons, of killing any that oppose his rule. It will be interesting to see what the eventual fate of Syria's CWs is. Meanwhile Iran is getting ready to cross Obama's "red line", again with Putin calling the shots.

Now wait a minute here- thought good and loyal CONS didn't want us helping the mean ol' Christian killing Sunni Terrorists? Our military wasn't on his ass for killing his own people, President Obama was ticked Assad used Chemical weapons.

As far as valuable customer, we sell billions more (30B to Syria's 4B) each year so it is like letting a small fry nibble the crumbs that fell to the floor.

No sir, Putin puffed up by sending more ships to Syria and had his attack dogs bark oh so fierce about 'defending' Syria have back down like most mongrels and now want a way out. I suspect there are a few bumps along the path but I do believe it took the real threat of a strike to have any weight... after all I do believe CONS claimed President Obama wanting to talk to Iran instead of the saber rattling BushII did to no good effect was wussy... :roll:
 
Well, I'll believe your take when it happens...so far, we've seen more turns than a mountain road from Obama. I think you place too much trust in the Russians..

And I never believed your take from jump street. Better to maneuver than put your head down and run into the brick wall. Never claimed to trust the Russians, but also never claimed to trust CONS either.

DO know if Putin REALLY wanted to start WWIII like some CONS insisted.... he wouldn't have offered an out. If Assad REALLY meant he would light up the Middle East he never would have jumped at the offer.

I'm betting you don't play cards much.... :peace
 
Now wait a minute here- thought good and loyal CONS didn't want us helping the mean ol' Christian killing Sunni Terrorists? Our military wasn't on his ass for killing his own people, President Obama was ticked Assad used Chemical weapons.

As far as valuable customer, we sell billions more (30B to Syria's 4B) each year so it is like letting a small fry nibble the crumbs that fell to the floor.

No sir, Putin puffed up by sending more ships to Syria and had his attack dogs bark oh so fierce about 'defending' Syria have back down like most mongrels and now want a way out. I suspect there are a few bumps along the path but I do believe it took the real threat of a strike to have any weight... after all I do believe CONS claimed President Obama wanting to talk to Iran instead of the saber rattling BushII did to no good effect was wussy... :roll:

You obviously confuse me with a "con".
 
Laffin, I can't help the FACT CON is short for CONservative. beats libtards, libbos and the other crap 'fair minded' CONS use. (and let's not mention 'Chairman', 'your boy', 'King', 'Kenyan' and the other crap CONS use.... )

Naw you 'fair minded' CONS just don't see both sides at all.... carry on with your CONvolutions... :peace

A potpourri of nastiness that impedes discussion.:peace
 
A potpourri of nastiness that impedes discussion.:peace

I agree, and yet many Cons can't help but go there. They can't debate more than twice before the Chairman, Kenyan, King, Your boy crap starts to flow. They tend to use slurpage and other oral sex terms rather than debate.

Bless their little hearts...
 
If you quack and waddle ya just might get plucked... :)

Great argument! Anyone that disagrees with Obama, which includes many demorats on the Syria issue, is really acting like a conservative. You seem to see no problem with Obama's constantly evolving Syria positions. Perhaps trying to pick one of them, and defending it, is just to darned difficult right now since you may end up in a differnet place than Obama in a day or two - better to simply impart evil motives on those that disagree with any of the Obama plans.
 
I agree, and yet many Cons can't help but go there. They can't debate more than twice before the Chairman, Kenyan, King, Your boy crap starts to flow. They tend to use slurpage and other oral sex terms rather than debate.

Bless their little hearts...

Yep, only Obama supporters should be allowed to use vitriolic name calling from the start. Because we all know what victims they all are.
 
I agree, and yet many Cons can't help but go there. They can't debate more than twice before the Chairman, Kenyan, King, Your boy crap starts to flow. They tend to use slurpage and other oral sex terms rather than debate.

Bless their little hearts...

Frankly, you're the only poster I've observed referring to those terms in a long time.:peace
 
Back
Top Bottom