• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

US plans for '3 days of attack' on Syria

BmanMcfly said:
I don't get how anyone could support this kind of action. seriously, how many people actually believe that a sovereign nation woukd just allow themselves to be attacked without bringing about some sort of retribution.

that is unlesd the intention is to have Syria retaliate and use that retaliation as justification for an all out invasion. that woukd then open the door to a regiobal war that woukd engulfe iran and all surroundibg natiins as a minimum.
Click to expand...


Right. So, sense John Kerry was asked while in London, was there anything president Assad could do to avoid a US attack on his country and government, John Kerry said, "yes, he can surrender all his chemical weapons to the international community in one week." We'll, president Assad didn't even wait one day, he said, OK ill do that. But the US was lying again/still. Regime change is the goal and they will stop at nothing short of that. And as documented by another poster today there's a gas pipeline deal that is part of the motive for war on Syria.
 
specklebang said:
Really, we're the biggest bully in the schoolyard and fighting back is not an option. For which we should be grateful. As long as we pick on small countries, we're unlikely to have any retribution.
Click to expand...

Yup, makes us tuff, huh?
 
Still and again the US has zero credibility.
 
Bronson said:
Yea let's go bomb brown people in the ME

That's classy. Supporting the murderers of Christians is "classy"

Obama! Obama!

Bomb Bomb for Jihad!
Click to expand...

Most of the right supported it under Bush. In fact, the right re-elected him again to do it more.
 
MMC said:
Well Monte.....we can bitch all we want. There is no doubt we will strike. I think Obama will wait until after the 11th.To much has been put into play. Like Kerry Stated. They weren't even going to consider any objective arguments. This is to dire now. We can't let others think they can get away with using Chems.
Click to expand...
except that we are not 100% sure who used them.
 
TheNextEra said:
Most of the right supported it under Bush. In fact, the right re-elected him again to do it more.
Click to expand...

Ah, the old "Bush had his wars, Obama needs his".9/11 was the impetus for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Wars Obama promised to end. Still in Afghanistan.
Do this Syria thing, and I will put money that we will be there for years.
 
CRUE CAB said:
Ah, the old "Bush had his wars, Obama needs his".9/11 was the impetus for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Wars Obama promised to end. Still in Afghanistan.
Do this Syria thing, and I will put money that we will be there for years.
Click to expand...


Your right Crue, you guys on the right let Bush do his bull****, and Next and his partisan hacks will let Obama do the same. That's why America is sucking!
 
Surtr said:
She must have never served in the US Military, then, because nobody is ever prepared for everything.
Click to expand...

A guy who would know said, when hostilities begin, all plans go out the window.
 
a351 said:
Because it's clearly a choice between only two options. Keep your mouth shut entirely or slander and berate a decorated veteran due to his age and the fact you merely disagree with him. Good thinkin' :thumbs:
Click to expand...

Just because someone is a "decorated veteran" doesn't mean they are worthy of respect. Especially when they use their "decorated veteran" status for personal gain and politics.
 
Montecresto said:
Your right Crue, you guys on the right let Bush do his bull****, and Next and his partisan hacks will let Obama do the same. That's why America is sucking!
Click to expand...

We "let" Bush do it? Like we had some input in it.
Any one with half a brain knew Bush was going to Iraq once elected, to avenge daddy and "finish the job". 9/11 was just the reason to go back.
 
reinoe said:
Just because someone is a "decorated veteran" doesn't mean they are worthy of respect. Especially when they use their "decorated veteran" status for personal gain and politics.
Click to expand...

You go trough what he did, then come and bad mouth him.
 
CRUE CAB said:
You go trough what he did, then come and bad mouth him.
Click to expand...
You're pathetic if you think that because someone went through bad things in life then they are above reproach. You sicken me. Go give McCain a blowjob and leave the thinking to the rest of us.
 
reinoe said:
You're pathetic if you think that because someone went through bad things in life then they are above reproach. You sicken me. Go give McCain a blowjob and leave the thinking to the rest of us.
Click to expand...
Go get your arms broken and beaten every day for a few years. He may not be 100% right on this issue, but he is more man then you will ever be.
 
CRUE CAB said:
Go get your arms broken and beaten every day for a few years. He may not be 100% right on this issue, but he is more man then you will ever be.
Click to expand...

Ahh but this isn't a thread about "manliness", this is a thread about issues. Or are you saying that it's ok to be wrong on the issues as long as someone is appropriately "manly"? Here's a hint this is 2013 and not the stone age, where the intellect puts us above the animals. I'm not even going to mock you for your homoerotic fascination with a 77 year old man.
 
CRUE CAB said:
Go get your arms broken and beaten every day for a few years. He may not be 100% right on this issue, but he is more man then you will ever be.
Click to expand...

Only a person that would cut your heart out and eat it (oh, like the nice little rebels we support in Syria) wouldn't have sympathy for John McCain for the treatment he received in Nam. But how is that relevant to him being, not less than 100% right Crue, but 100% wrong on this?
 
SBu said:
Actually don't agree. We may agree that the timing of Obama is terrible and he's made the situation worse, but we should "disturb" other countries if it's in our national interest.
Click to expand...
Well, but I was being facetious and less focused on the generality of the issue than its specifics. Certainly, there are circumstances when we need to "disturb" other countries.
 
reinoe said:
You're pathetic if you think that because someone went through bad things in life then they are above reproach. You sicken me. Go give McCain a blowjob and leave the thinking to the rest of us.
Click to expand...

You'll forgive me if I can't include you in "the rest of us" when you've said this and then referred to a homoerotic attraction to McCain. :roll:
 
ttwtt78640 said:
It has not been explained why the Arab League is incapable of dealing with this situation. While the U.S. could use its military might to punish all evil doers in the world, there is no rationale to say why it is in the national interest of the U.S. to do so.
Click to expand...

I think the international community is opposed to Sarin gas WMDs and chemical weapons of any sort.
 
Sharona said:
I think the international community is opposed to Sarin gas WMDs and chemical weapons of any sort.
Click to expand...

They're Opposed to terrorists too.....so that's not saying to much.
 
MMC said:
They're Opposed to terrorists too.....so that's not saying to much.
Click to expand...

Well.. even if the Syrians continue fighting each other.. the key concern here is Sarin gas and the use of chemical weapons anywhere.
 
Sharona said:
Well.. even if the Syrians continue fighting each other.. the key concern here is Sarin gas and the use of chemical weapons anywhere.
Click to expand...

Yeah.....well all should have had so much of a concern when the Rebel/Terrorists decided to use them. The First time. That should have sent the same Warning Bells off as well as the World waking up and saying. Damn.....terrorists just got their hands on some chems and could get more. We best do something about that.

To think we could have just hit the FSA command and their STNC boys in Turkey.....then this whole conflict would have ended a year ago. No one trusts traitors on any side. In the true reality of things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom