- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You say "good to know", but you don't apologize for you purposeful attempt at distortion.
Since it wasn't purposeful, there is no reason to apologize. I admitted that I made an error.
Then you go on to paranoid-suggest that "how do we really know it wasn't you -- they sound like you". :roll:
I saw no actual usage of the word, other than some anonymous posters. Since you have proven that you post dishonestly, the supposition that you could be linking to your own posts is not so absurd. Feel free to post any legitimate source that uses the term, and I will retract.
Then you again call the word "homarriage" a theory, which is an obviously false assertion. The word isn't a "theory", it's simply a coined term, not a "theory" at all, clearly revealing that you don't know what a "theory" truly is. :lol:
Of course it's a theory. It's a theory that they word has actual and appropriate usage.
The rest of your post is simply more error-based posturing.
The rest of my post demonstrated that you have no facts to back up your position.
What this all does prove is that, once again, you lost on point, and you're unable to admit it and then simply let go.
What it proves it that, once again, I showed you to be in error and to be unable to back your positions with facts. You should be used to this by now.