- Joined
- Jul 28, 2013
- Messages
- 25,834
- Reaction score
- 25,190
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Every slippery slope argument you presented was summerily refuted either by me or someone else. Easily and without much effort I might add.
You have no understanding or grasp of this issue whatsoever. Your entire argument lacks logic and since it is very difficult to discuss any issue with someone who doesn't seem to understand basic logical tenets in discussion, discussing this issue with you has been challenging. No substance can be presented, since you can't present information without it being logically wrong. For instance, as CT said, what you posted above is an appeal to tradition logical fallacy and is therefore not pertinent. You don't seem to understand these basic concepts even though they have been pointed out.
So, along with your standard slippery slope logical fallacy... something that your entire position is based upon, we can add an appeal to emotion to your repertoire. Good job.
No you hold the banner for emotional arguments. Your record is easily accessed.
And it is not an argument to continually attack another who disagrees with you every time claim it as a fallacy. Duh.
Like I said I have a real pretty pair of socks with your name on it.