Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary[W:101]

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

P. Kersey said:

I said they were enfranchised. I didn't give an opinion if it was good, bad or indifferent. It's right there in front of you. Stop lying.
Read it again..

Click to expand...

I've read it time and again. In context, you were saying it's a negative. You must be following the Fox playbook - imply, but don't say anything.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

I'll check again, but I believe they are in favor of black people voting.

Click to expand...

Yes, but voting for one party only.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

I've read it time and again. In context, you were saying it's a negative. You must be following the Fox playbook - imply, but don't say anything.

Click to expand...

ohhhh..I see..you've been exposed, haven't you?.now your excuse is "context"..

I said that "for over 50 years negroes have been enfranchised"..Nothing more nothing less...there is no "context" or hidden meaning. Read it and take it at face value..LMFAO..it's right there in black and white. I couldn't have made it any plainer..you're desperately trying to figure out a way to dig out of the hole you put yourself in, we all see that.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

I'll check again, but I believe they are in favor of black people voting.

Click to expand...

Sire they're in favor of black folks voting...for Democrats.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

Unitedwestand13 said:

The topic of civil rights is important to me so I want to post this news story.

LA Times



Forgive me for posting a awkward or bad link

Click to expand...

Oh brother....... Because there is so much inequality for the Black Community today.... :roll:

Oh yeah, JUSTICE FOR TRAYVON! :roll:

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

Or you could read it as empowering and enfranchising black people was a mistake. That would require reading the words he typed instead of looking for a reason to defend racism.

Click to expand...

Only a raging partisan hack would read it that way.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

apdst said:

Sire they're in favor of black folks voting...for Democrats.

Click to expand...

Never said they weren't partisan. I'm pretty sure George Bush is in favor of them voting for Republicans. Welcome to "How Politics Works 101."

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

apdst said:

Only a raging partisan hack would read it that way.

Click to expand...

I see, so the part about blacks being feral savages....well that's just a fact, right?

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

Never said they weren't partisan. I'm pretty sure George Bush is in favor of them voting for Republicans. Welcome to "How Politics Works 101."

Click to expand...

Sure that's how politics works. No one denied that. But shouldn't we expect more from the average voter to see what's going on?

The Democrats are destroying race relations in the country and you call it "How Politics Works101"? Maybe it's time the electorate got a clue about Race Relations 101 so there could be some genuine 'inclusiveness' in America.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

P. Kersey said:

ohhhh..I see..you've been exposed, haven't you?.now your excuse is "context"..

Click to expand...

I've been exposed as someone who reads and thinks! OMG, I guess I can't join the Know-Nothing Party then.

I said that "for over 50 years negroes have been enfranchised"..Nothing more nothing less...there is no "context" or hidden meaning. Read it and take it at face value..LMFAO..it's right there in black and white. I couldn't have made it any plainer..you're desperately trying to figure out a way to dig out of the hole you put yourself in, we all see that.

Click to expand...

Well, let's see what you said:

P. Kersey said:

"For many of them, the event was a passing of the torch to a new generation to take up the unfinished cause of the civil rights movement--the promise of equality "embedded in the founding of America," as Cheryl LaRoche put it."

Great...Another generation of anti white blacks raised in a constant atmosphere of racial jealousy and resentment..
'Unfinished cause"?

Please. No other race has been given as much as negroes.

Click to expand...

Now let's list what they've been given

For over five decades we've "empowered" them, "franchised" them, pampered them, placed them on pedestals as creatures of pity... and for all that spending, pampering and pandering, we have vast urban areas of slums, ghettos, ruins filled with some of the most violent, blood thirsty, savage, feral creatures to ever stride the planet.

Click to expand...

OMG, we gave them some basic rights! That's so much more than what anybody's been given in the history of the world! What's next, are we going to stop throwing smallpox blankets onto the reservation? We've pampered them? By which definition of "pampered" do you mean? Slums and ghettos (which existed long before the '60s) aren't the country club. You might have noticed that in all of your research of facts.

We've had over 50 years of forced integration. over 50 years of generous social entitlement programs. and over 50 years of excuses

Click to expand...

Over 50 years of forced integration? First of all, how is it integrated if they all live in slums and ghettos? Do you live there? Why are we pampering you?

"Forced integration" means what - we allow them to live in society? We have to share bathrooms with them now?

We elevated the negroes, we've given money to bring them out of poverty, we've passed laws to prevent non-white discrimination, we've advanced them in our schools without them needing to learn, we've given them jobs and home loans they didn't qualify for.

Click to expand...

We elevated them? First of all, who's "we?" Secondly, how is it "elevating" them to allow them a few basic rights of being a citizen?

So let's see the "facts" here. Black people have gotten more than anybody else, we're pampering them and elevating them. By empowering them, enfranchising them, and allowing them to use our drinking fountains. Meanwhile all they do is sit on their ass in the "luxury" of the ghetto.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

Grant said:

Sure that's how politics works. No one denied that. But shouldn't we expect more from the average voter to see what's going on?

The Democrats are destroying race relations in the country and you call it "How Politics Works101"? Maybe it's time the electorate got a clue about Race Relations 101 so there could be some genuine 'inclusiveness' in America.

Click to expand...

No, I call the fact that Al Sharpton wants them to vote Democratic "How Politics Works." Of course he does, he's a Democrat.

I'm just stating a fact here, the rest of it is your own reading. I've decided to debate like P Kersey, just list "facts" and deny an agenda, though in this case the rest of it is you. Democrats want people to vote for Democrats. It's not hard.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

I see, so the part about blacks being feral savages....well that's just a fact, right?

Click to expand...

Well, at least you acknowledge you were wrong about "context"...by desperately changing the subject.

Since you evidently don't carefully read and comprehend before you comment emotionally, I'll correct you on this mischaracterization once again. I was alluding to the criminals...like the ones who killed chris lane, Mr. Belton, ....etc...I posted that very clearly..you're pretending to misunderstand so you can proselytize and grandstand. LMAO..Now, suddenly, you DON'T understand context! LMAO That's called "situational intelligence", I think. You're funny!

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

No, I call the fact that Al Sharpton wants them to vote Democratic "How Politics Works." Of course he does, he's a Democrat.

I'm just stating a fact here, the rest of it is your own reading. I've decided to debate like P Kersey, just list "facts" and deny an agenda, though in this case the rest of it is you. Democrats want people to vote for Democrats. It's not hard.

Click to expand...

Of course they do. But why would anyone vote for them knowing what they have done, and are doing, to the country? Don't you believe the electorate should be better informed?

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

Grant said:

Of course they do. But why would anyone vote for them knowing what they have done, and are doing, to the country? Don't you believe the electorate should be better informed?

Click to expand...

They'd vote for them because the only other choice is Republicans. When choosing between a douche and a turd, it's not a good choice either way.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

P. Kersey said:

Well, at least you acknowledge you were wrong about "context"...by desperately changing the subject.

Since you evidently don't carefully read and comprehend before you comment emotionally, I'll correct you on this mischaracterization once again. I was alluding to the criminals...like the ones who killed chris lane, Mr. Belton, ....etc...I posted that very clearly..you're pretending to misunderstand so you can proselytize and grandstand. LMAO..Now, suddenly, you DON'T understand context! LMAO That's called "situational intelligence", I think. You're funny!

Click to expand...

I thought you were just posting facts without any kind of judgement at all.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

I've been exposed as someone who reads and thinks! OMG, I guess I can't join the Know-Nothing Party then.

Click to expand...

Meaningless doubletalk.

rocket88 said:

Well, let's see what you said:

Click to expand...

I know what I said..so does everyone else. It's all right there in my OP. No need to quote it again.

rocket88 said:

OMG, we gave them some basic rights!

Click to expand...

Yes we did. everyone knows that. Your point?

rocket88 said:

That's so much more than what anybody's been given in the history of the world!

Click to expand...

Irrelevant and meaningless chatter.

rocket88 said:

What's next, are we going to stop throwing smallpox blankets onto the reservation?

Click to expand...

irrelevant and meaningless chatter.

rocket88 said:

We've pampered them? By which definition of "pampered" do you mean? Slums and ghettos (which existed long before the '60s) aren't the country club. You might have noticed that in all of your research of facts.

Click to expand...

Read my post again. The reference is self explanatory. I made sure it would be in the simplest terms. This trick of assigning specious motives and reinterpreting plain english is wearing thin, my boy. No one is fooled.

rocket88 said:

Over 50 years of forced integration?

Click to expand...

When the government passes a law it is forcing people to comply. Compliance with laws isn't voluntary.

rocket88 said:

First of all, how is it integrated if they all live in slums and ghettos?

Click to expand...

"First of all" are you saying all negroes live in slums and ghettos? Drama queen much?
Second. That isn't the legal definition of integration.

rocket88 said:

Do you live there? Why are we pampering you?

Click to expand...

Meaningless chatter

rocket88 said:

"Forced integration" means what - we allow them to live in society? We have to share bathrooms with them now?

Click to expand...

If you don't understand the definition of the word integration I suggest you go look it up for yourself and read it until you can understand it.
You question every single word I post and purposely misinterpret for attention. Kind of like a kid stomping their foot and saying "look at me..look at me"..

Me explaining it to you wouldn't convince you anyway.

rocket88 said:

We elevated them?First of all, who's "we?"

Click to expand...

The united states of america.

rocket88 said:

Secondly, how is it "elevating" them to allow them a few basic rights of being a citizen?

Click to expand...

That's not what I said. Go read it again. I purposely kept it simple so the lowest common denominator could understand. I'm NOT posting it again.

rocket88 said:

So let's see the "facts" here. Black people have gotten more than anybody else, we're pampering them and elevating them. By empowering them, enfranchising them, and allowing them to use our drinking fountains. Meanwhile all they do is sit on their ass in the "luxury" of the ghetto.

Click to expand...

I said nothing of the sort..you're lying again. Go read it again. Cherry picking random words from a post and then adding your own is dishonest.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

They'd vote for them because the only other choice is Republicans. When choosing between a douche and a turd, it's not a good choice either way.

Click to expand...

Oh, c'mon! Surely you can do better than that. It seems you are just avoiding the debate.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

P. Kersey said:

Meaningless doubletalk.



I know what I said..so does everyone else. It's all right there in my OP. No need to quote it again.







Yes we did. everyone knows that. Your point?



Irrelevant and meaningless chatter.




irrelevant and meaningless chatter.




Read my post again. The reference is self explanatory. I made sure it would be in the simplest terms. This trick of assigning specious motives and reinterpreting plain english is wearing thin, my boy. No one is fooled.





When the government passes a law it is forcing people to comply. Compliance with laws isn't voluntary.



"First of all" are you saying all negroes live in slums and ghettos? Drama queen much?
Second. That isn't the legal definition of integration.




Meaningless chatter



If you don't understand the definition of the word integration I suggest you go look it up for yourself and read it until you can understand it.
You question every single word I post and purposely misinterpret for attention. Kind of like a kid stomping their foot and saying "look at me..look at me"..

Me explaining it to you wouldn't convince you anyway.




The united states of america.



That's not what I said. Go read it again. I purposely kept it simple so the lowest common denominator could understand. I'm NOT posting it again.



I said nothing of the sort..you're lying again. Go read it again. Cherry picking random words from a post and then adding your own is dishonest.

Click to expand...

I'm sick of this ****. You say things leaving everybody to make their own judgements, and then get mad when they do. Maybe you should say what your opinion is so that we don't have to guess at what it is.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

I thought you were just posting facts without any kind of judgement at all.

Click to expand...

What you "thought" is irrelevant to this conversation..
Your "thought" processes have been on display for some time. I doubt that you have impressed very many people. I could be wrong.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

Grant said:

Oh, c'mon! Surely you can do better than that. It seems you are just avoiding the debate.

Click to expand...

Because there is no debate. Which party cares more about black people? It's just going to be a tardfest. They both care equally little for anybody but themselves.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

I'm sick of this ****. You say things leaving everybody to make their own judgements, and then get mad when they do. Maybe you should say what your opinion is so that we don't have to guess at what it is.

Click to expand...

No one is "mad" about anything.You're exaggerating again.

Once again my post was in plain english.
You've spent page after page trying to invent "context" and hidden meanings and secret codes and grandstanding to appear clever and for some reason trying to discredit or marginalize me. You keep trying to reinterpret what I say, rather than focusing on the discussion.

I don't know, maybe people think you are clever..Doesn't matter.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

P. Kersey said:

No one is "mad" about anything.You're exaggerating again.

Once again my post was in plain english.
You've spent page after page trying to invent "context" and hidden meanings and secret codes and grandstanding to appear clever and for some reason trying to discredit or marginalize me. You keep trying to reinterpret what I say, rather than focusing on the discussion.

I don't know, maybe people think you are clever..Doesn't matter.

Click to expand...

Then tell us what your opinion is. We don't need a ****ing encyclopedia.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

Then tell us what your opinion is. We don't need a ****ing encyclopedia.

Click to expand...

I made my point in the original post.

If you cannot keep pace with the discussion, perhaps you should excuse yourself from it. I appreciate any input you may have, but please read the thread before commenting to avoid redundant, mundane repetition.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

rocket88 said:

Because there is no debate. Which party cares more about black people? It's just going to be a tardfest. They both care equally little for anybody but themselves.

Click to expand...

Then give some support for that opinion. There is a real difference between the two parties, both in their history and in their attitudes toward making the country a better place for all peoples. I believe that a great many people are being bamboozled by BS and that the facts support my argument.

The Republicans simply have a better record when it comes to improving race relations than the Democrats, and there seems little doubt about that.

Re: Crowds gather for March on Washington 50th anniversary

If Dr. King were alive today, he'd be dismissed as an Uncle Tom.