• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

89 Year Old WWII Veteran Beaten and Left for Dead Dies

Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

IF it has nothing to do with white supremacy then why the use of a white supremacist website?

"White supremacist" means white people want to rule over other races...No one does..that's a dodge that people use when they don't have a valid counter argument
Facts are facts. Truth is truth. Those people are dead. Negroes killed them.

(FYI it shows quite a few whites as criminals as well as white gays and a few Asians, justa GP hate website)

I never said whites..or asians don't commit crimes. I said and can prove that negroes commit OVERHALF of ALL violent crime in the u.s.

I don't know what a "GP" website is?

IF you went to a more honest place to look at the REAL facts-

84% of the white folks murdered in this country are done in by members of their own race- (DoJ pdf) that means 16% were killed by another race.

According to 1992 numbers 1 million whites were raped, robbed, killed, or assaulted by a black and 132,000 blacks had a white attacker. since blacks are roughly 13% of the population that seems to say it is a matter of availability not targeting.

2010 census shows north Carolina is 22% black and they commit 21.6% of the state's crimes. White alone is 71.9% and they commit 66.8% of the crimes.

According to the DoJ, 2002, interracial crime was 18% white on black.

Yet you post no links to your claims...
....and you disingenuously pretend to not understand the concept of per capita or percentage. That's a weak dodge and evasion. Everyone knows that whites are the majority..so therefore raw data will show that more crime is committed by whites. Look at the percentages. Same as welfare RAW numbers will show more whites on welfare..percentage show that negroes are disproportionately the recipients of welfare... Statistically negroes represent a hugely disproportionate number of people on welfare and criminality based on percentage of population.


While it can be a difficult concept to grasp but rather than say crime by race it is to see crime as a economic trend. Areas of high unemployment and low incomes trend toward crime.

I don't care..and neither do most intelligent people...what the EXCUSES and rationalizations are..we are sick and tired of PROVEN disproportionate crime rates of negroes.

It is interesting to me that so many tried to put three black men in the truck that murdered the white jogger in Duncan, Ok. when the REAL pictures of the three came out some in here tried REAL hard to claim the white kid either 'looked black' or 'looked like he has some black in him'. :roll:

So a white person was involved.Does that make it ok? ..they purposely targeted Chris because he was white and according to these negroes twitter messages they hate white people...

I know some see the world as a simple black or white place, but it is a bit more complex than that.

Alinsky tactics..minimalize and pretend superior knowledge....
 
Last edited:
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

I didn't want to repeat all that crap... I listed the sources i used... what we did in the 'olden days'. facts are facts, and the white supremacists use only a very select few as if only race counts....

I do have to laugh at yout attempt to claim i demean you in any way.... you are doing that all by your oneses...
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

In the interest of accuracy, this gentleman looked exactly like Obama's grandpa.

According to the news this morning, the thug they haven't caught yet looks like he could be Obama's son. Maybe it's a family thing?
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

too sad story and he looks like a lovely old guy .(

the murderers deserve every kind of punishment but l wonder something about it

if the murderers were purple or green or white would you still be discussing it ?
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

I didn't want to repeat all that crap... I listed the sources i used... what we did in the 'olden days'. facts are facts, and the white supremacists use only a very select few as if only race counts....

Name some "white supremacists" and show where they said they want to rule other races?
No one wants to rule over black people...same weak, tired slanderous dodge as before...
Now you abandon your position and retreat due to not having sources, declare "victory" and pretend you're above it all.

My source is the FBI...are they "white supremacists", too?
Race obviously "counts" when leftist apologists want it to. Otherwise we wouldn't have affirmative action, government set asides, quotas, preference in school admissions and hiring, etc....or are those all fraudulent programs?

So it's resolved; Negroes commit a disproportionate amount of crime and black on white crime far exceeds white on black.

I do have to laugh at yout attempt to claim i demean you in any way.... you are doing that all by your oneses...

You deflect again and try to evade. Because you can't debunk my facts, you try to change the subject.
 
Last edited:
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

too sad story and he looks like a lovely old guy .(

the murderers deserve every kind of punishment but l wonder something about it

if the murderers were purple or green or white would you still be discussing it ?


Yes. Murder is wrong. Period.
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

Right..you abandon your position and retreat due to not having sources, declare "victory" and pretend you're above it all.

So it's resolved; Negroes commit a disproportionate amount of crime and black on white crime far exceeds white on black.



You deflect again and try to evade. Because you can't debunk my facts, you try to change the subject.

Poverty has a lot more do with crime than race does...
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

Yes. Murder is wrong. Period.

l am not sure

teh "white colored" prejudice makes people think that teh blacks are usually potential criminals
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

Poverty has a lot more do with crime than race does...

No one said race causes crime. The fact that negroes commit a disproportionate amount of crime versus their population numbers is hard truth.

Look, if poverty causes crime, explain how..since there are more white people in the country...and therefore more poor white people...white crime rates aren't even CLOSE to black? (Remember to factor percentages)
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

Right..you abandon your position and retreat due to not having sources, declare "victory" and pretend you're above it all. So it's resolved; Negroes commit a disproportionate amount of crime and black on white crime far exceeds white on black. You deflect again and try to evade. Because you can't debunk my facts, you try to change the subject.

You dodge the facts in that there are far more whites to be victims in this country than blacks. fact is a white man is FAR more likely to be shot by a white man than by a black. I gave my numbers and my sources...you gave a white supremacy website... :roll:

You also dodge away from the economic aspect, there are poor areas in this country. Poor employment in blighted areas creates high crime. Those in that area will fall victim to criminals far more than in gated communities far from the poor.

What your 'logic' can't address is whites have far more to worry about from their 'own kind' than blacks. It is difficult for 70+ percent of the population to prey on 13% to the same level as the reverse. The availability of victims just isn't there.

Like i said, i am not trying to demean you, your bigotry does that....
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

Look, if poverty causes crime, explain how..

Poverty doesn't cause crime. Crime causes poverty.
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

l am not sure

teh "white colored" prejudice makes people think that teh blacks are usually potential criminals


Based on FBI statistics and factoring in percentage of population, more negroes are criminals than white people. This is just a true fact.
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

You dodge the facts in that there are far more whites to be victims in this country than blacks. fact is a white man is FAR more likely to be shot by a white man than by a black. I gave my numbers and my sources...you gave a white supremacy website... :roll:

Yes..you gave some numbers and sources (but no links) and you purposely misinterpret them to desperately try to support your weak premise.
White supremacy again? is that all you have? Those people are dead...negroes killed them. Those are hard facts.

You also dodge away from the economic aspect, there are poor areas in this country. Poor employment in blighted areas creates high crime. Those in that area will fall victim to criminals far more than in gated communities far from the poor.

I'm not dodging anything. I said that negroes commit a disproportionate amount of crime based on their population numbers. You're the one who keeps flailing around and trying to equivocate, rationalize and make excuses.

What your 'logic' can't address is whites have far more to worry about from their 'own kind' than blacks. It is difficult for 70+ percent of the population to prey on 13% to the same level as the reverse. The availability of victims just isn't there.

No...we've been over this already. Whites aren't nearly as criminally inclined as blacks...FBI statistics prove it. Negroes commit OVER HALF of ALL violent crime in the u.s. despite only being 13% of the population. Hard facts.

Like i said, i am not trying to demean you, your bigotry does that....
You're dodging again.
Quoting proven government statistics isn't "bigotry".
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

Poverty doesn't cause crime. Crime causes poverty.

I didn't say it did..I was questioning the logic of the person who DID say that.
You got anything relevant to add or just picking/editing things out of context?
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

l am not sure

teh "white colored" prejudice makes people think that teh blacks are usually potential criminals

speak for yourself. Not all white people see blacks as potential criminals. :roll:
 
too sad story and he looks like a lovely old
guy .(

the murderers deserve every kind of punishment but l wonder something about it

if the murderers were purple or green or white would you still be discussing it ?

In the Context of our racially overcharged society I think the skin color of the attackers is relevent.

We're still waiting for the President to speak out on this attack, the murder of the Australian Baseball player, and the thousands of blacks killed by other blacks in the inner cities of our most Liberal run cities.

But he won't apparently and for one sick and disgusting reason. Because he can't construct a racist false narrative to gin up politicial support .

Welcome to the Democrat party of the United States.

One of the most insidious, corrupt and disgusting political organizations ever created.
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

No one said race causes crime. The fact that negroes commit a disproportionate amount of crime versus their population numbers is hard truth.

Look, if poverty causes crime, explain how..since there are more white people in the country...and therefore more poor white people...white crime rates aren't even CLOSE to black? (Remember to factor percentages)
The ratio of % of whites in poverty is much less than blacks. That is pretty simple if you'd bother to look it up.
 
In the Context of our racially overcharged society I think the skin color of the attackers is relevent.

We're still waiting for the President to speak out on this attack, the murder of the Australian Baseball player, and the thousands of blacks killed by other blacks in the inner cities of our most Liberal run cities.

But he won't apparently and for one sick and disgusting reason. Because he can't construct a racist false narrative to gin up politicial support .

Welcome to the Democrat party of the United States.

One of the most insidious, corrupt and disgusting political organizations ever created.

*checks Fenton's lean*

Yup. Not surprising.

obama3.jpg
 
Oh the hell with it...here's the truth...now make up some more excuses.

Disproportionate crime rates of negroes (based on percentage of population) proven by FBI statistics.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/table-43

First of all, it is important to mention the USA 2010 census data*, according to which:
Whites constitute 72.4% of the population
Blacks constitute 12.6% of the population
The ratio is thus 5.75:1

1. Rape:

The rape rates, from the years 1996 to 2008, can be found here:
1. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
2. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)

The averages for all the years are as follows:
All victims: 219,372
White victims: 180,560
Black victims: 38,812
-----------------------------
All white rapists: 131,351
All black rapists: 52,908
White on black rapists: 1,869
Black on white rapists: 21,401

It is thus:
- 14.28 times more likely that any woman will be raped by a black man than a white man.

- 65.82 times more likely that a white woman will be raped by a black man than a black woman by a white man.

Some interesting observations:
For the years 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, there were ZERO white on black rapes reported.
When during 2003 to 2008 white men raped zero black women, blacks raped 131,413 white women and 148,343 black women!

In 2005, blacks even outnumbered whites on the number of rapes! 74,080 rapes were committed by blacks, whereas only 49,613 were committed by whites! That is 1.49 times more or 8,57 times more in proportion to the demographics.

2. Homicide by strangers:

The homicide rates** where the offenders were strangers, from the years 1976 to 2005, can be found here, on page 72:
http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/htius.pdf

The averages for all the years are as follows:
White on white stranger homicides: 41.64%
White on black stranger homicides: 5.08%
Black on black stranger homicides: 33.23%
Black on white stranger homicides: 18.77%

It is thus:
- 6.4 times more likely that any person will be murdered by a black stranger than a white stranger.

- 21.25 times more likely that a white person will be murdered by a black stranger than a black person by a white stranger.

One can also see that blacks commit more than half of all stranger murders, when they are only 12.6% of the population.

*Keep in mind that in the USA, Arabs and other Semites, as well as Mexicans and other non-white Hispanics and mixed people are considered "white," so whites constituted only about 60-65% of the population in 2010, and it is not known how many of the "white on white," "white on black" or even "black on white" cases were actually white offenders or victims.

**These figures differ when you also take homicides by acquaintances into account, which is irrelevant to the point I'm making here, that it is far more likely you will be killed by some random black on the street than by a random white person, thus profiling is completely justified and logical.



Top 10 most dangerous cities in America 2013

1. Camden, New Jersey (Population 77, 344) (17.59% Caucasian, 48.07% African American, 34.34% Other Race) ($27,027)

2. Detroit, Michigan (Population 713,777) ( 10.6% Caucasian, 82.7% African American, 6.7% Other Race) ($25,787)

3. Atlanta, Georgia (Population 420,003) ( 38.4% Caucasian, 54% African American, 7.6% Other Race) ($35,453)

4. St. Louis, Missouri (Population 319,294) ( 43.9% Caucasian, 49.2% African American, 6.9% Other Race) ($29,159)

5. Gary, Indiana (Population 80,294) ( 11.92% Caucasian, 84.03% African American, 4.05% Other Race) ($27,195)

6. Washington, DC (Population 617,996) ( 38.5% Caucasian, 50.7% African American, 10.8% Other Race) ($55,755)

7. Hartford, Connecticut (Population 124,775) ( 18.72% Caucasian, 40.05% African American, 41.23% Other Race) ($20,820)

8. New Orleans, Louisiana (Population 343,829) ( 33% Caucasian, 60.2% African American, 6.8% Other Race) ($24,929)

9. Richmond, Virginia (Population 204,214) ( 41.6% Caucasian, 52.3% African American, 6.1% Other Race) ($31,121)

10. Birmingham, Alabama (Population 212,237) ( 35.07% Caucasian, 62.46% African American, 2.47% Other Race) ($26,735)

Dishonorable Mention: Chicago, Illinois (Population 2,695,598) (45.0% Caucasian, 32.9% African American, 22.1% Other Race) ($38,625)

Read more at Top 10 most dangerous cities in America 2013

Top 10 Safest cities in the US 2013
1. Newton, Massachusetts (Population 85,146) (79.6% Caucasian, 2.5% African American, 17.9% Other Race) ($112,230)

2. Brick Township, New Jersey (Population 75,072) ( 93.05% Caucasian, 2% African American, 4.95% Other Race) ($65,129)

3. Amherst, New York (Population 122,366) ( 83.8% Caucasian, 5.7% African American, 10.5% Other Race) ($55,427)

4. Mission Viejo, California (Population 93,305) ( 79.8% Caucasian, 1.3% African American, 18.9% Other Race) ($93,330)

5. Clarkstown, New York (Population 84,187) ( 79.97% Caucasian, 7.87% African American, 12.16% Other Race) ($92,121)

6. Lake Forest, California (Population 77,264) ( 70.3% Caucasian, 1.7% African American, 28% Other Race) ($86,285)

7. Thousand Oaks, California (Population 126,683) ( 80.3% Caucasian, 1.3% African American, 18.4% Other Race) ($101,120)

8. Colonie, New York (Population 81,591) ( 90.55% Caucasian, 3.96% African American, 5.85% Other Race) ($51,817)

9. Cary, North Carolina (Population 135,234) ( 73.1% Caucasian, 8% African American, 18.9% Other Race) ($83,292)

10. Toms River, New Jersey (Population 91,239) ( 89.91% Caucasian, 2.7% African American, 7.39% Other Race) ($71,934)
Read more at Top 10 Safest cities in the US 2013


Here are some accurate stats according to population and race. You'll notice a hugely disproportionate number of blacks are represented.
Remember, percentage is the key.
According to the raw data, USUALLY whites commit more crime..but notice that as a smaller percentage of the population more crimes are committed by blacks

Fewer blacks but higher numbers, see how that works?

Table 43 - Crime in the United States 2006
Table 49 - Crime in the United States 2006
Table 55 - Crime in the United States 2006
Table 61 - Crime in the United States 2006
Table 67 - Crime in the United States 2006

Here are some more stats from solid, reliable, thoroughly researched and verified sources.


Statistics that compare race and crime are hard to locate (for SOME reason) these days.

Statistics
*More than 1,600 Whites are murdered by Blacks each year. Blacks murder Whites at 18 times the rate Whites murder Blacks.
*About 1 million Whites were murdered, robbed, assaulted, or raped by Blacks in 1992
*In the last 30 years, 170 million violent and nonviolent crimes were committed by Blacks against Whites in the U.S.
*Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than Whites, although they comprise only one-seventh of the White population.
*27 million nonviolent crimes were committed in the U.S. in 1992 alone. 31% of the robberies involved Black offenders and White victims; only 2% involved White offenders and Black victims.
The above stats were collected by an Australian reporter, Neil Sheehan, who dug out half-concealed U.S. crime figures for an article in the Sydney Morning Herald (May 2, 1995). The contents of his article, he commented, could not possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media.

Paved With Good Intentions, a book by Jared Taylor, also studies crime statistics by race. It must be stressed that Blacks make up only 12% of the population according to the 1990 U.S. census (and Black males about 6%), but they commit a vastly disproportionate number of violent crime.

Mr. Taylor reveals:
1) 58% of all arrests for weapons violations are Blacks.
2) 46% of all arrests for violent crimes are Blacks.
3) 73% of all “justified self-defense” killings are committed by Blacks.
4) 60.5% of all Blacks are armed with some type of weapon at all times.
5) 98% of all youths arrested for gun fights in Atlanta are Blacks.


Major Findings of The Color of Crime -- Second, Expanded Edition (2005)

The Color of Crime
Race, Crime, and Justice in America
Second, Expanded Edition, 2005


Major Findings:

Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities.

Crime Rates

Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

Interracial Crime

Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

Gangs

Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

Incarceration

Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.
Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.


Explain to me how these are all the work of "white supremacists"? LMAO...

If you don't think there's a correlation, just look at the stats on crime. If you cannot find a pattern then immediately move to the poorest neighborhood closest to you.You will either figure it out or become a victim.
 
Last edited:
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

The ratio of % of whites in poverty is much less than blacks. That is pretty simple if you'd bother to look it up.

Wait..if poverty causes crime, as you say...and there are more whites in america as we know...logically there are more poor whites...yet white crime rates don't begin to approach those of blacks...you can't have it both ways.. Stop making excuses..
It's just a simple, proven fact that negroes commit a disproportionate amount of crime despite only being 13% of the population.

I understand and you've made it clear that you don't LIKE the truth. Nevertheless it is the truth.
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

Wait..if poverty causes crime, as you say...and there are more whites in america as we know...logically there are more poor whites...yet white crime rates don't begin to approach those of blacks...you can't have it both ways.. Stop making excuses..
It's just a simple, proven fact that negroes commit a disproportionate amount of crime despite only being 13% of the population.

I understand and you've made it clear that you don't LIKE the truth. Nevertheless it is the truth.
If you'd read what I wrote I said the % of whites in poverty is about 1/5th of the number of blacks. That is based on percentage of the population as well.

That is the reason poverty will cause more crime.

Here, let me help you.

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0712.pdf

Whites at poverty level: 12.3% (2012)
Blacks at poverty level: 25.8% (2012)

That is why you'll see more crime from blacks vs whites. When you have nothing the laws don't really matter when you are desperate. Which is also why high poverty areas regardless of race have high crime rates.
 
If you'd read what I wrote I said the % of whites in
poverty is about 1/5th of the number of blacks. That is based on percentage of the population as well.

That is the reason poverty will cause more crime.

Here, let me help you.

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0712.pdf

Whites at poverty level: 12.3% (2012)
Blacks at poverty level: 25.8% (2012)

That is why you'll see more crime from blacks vs whites. When you have nothing the laws don't really matter when you are desperate. Which is also why high poverty areas regardless of race have high crime rates.

Thats an absolutely ridiculous claim.

Its simplistic and generic description and its void of any objective correlation.

The issue of whether poverty follows crime or crime follows poverty is irrelevent.

Choices made by the individual that leads them down a life of poverty or crime and why those choices continue SHOULD be the issue but for some reason when it comes to justifying the continued failure of inner city areas that breed people like the two scum that killed the 88 year old veteren, the issue of self responsibillity is always " verboten".

That these people have only themselves to blame is a notion that's tagged as racist right out of the gate.

So it continues, and real heros are killed by worthless human trash, and we're supposed to ignore the culture and the political ideology that has allowed it to continue.
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

If you'd read what I wrote I said the % of whites in poverty is about 1/5th of the number of blacks. That is based on percentage of the population as well.

That is the reason poverty will cause more crime.

Here, let me help you.

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0712.pdf

Whites at poverty level: 12.3% (2012)
Blacks at poverty level: 25.8% (2012)

That is why you'll see more crime from blacks vs whites. When you have nothing the laws don't really matter when you are desperate. Which is also why high poverty areas regardless of race have high crime rates.


Let ME help YOU.
There are more whites in america..will you concede that?
Lets say there are 300 million people in the u.s and 72% of them are white.That's 216 million people...if 12% are at poverty level that equals 26 million. Still with me?

If negroes make up 13% of the population that equals a total of 39 million. 25% of that number at poverty level equals 9 million.

So that excuse is now debunked.

Now even though you've studiously avoided discussing actual crime rates supported by FBI statistics we know for a fact that negroes commit a disproportionately high amount of crime...Look at post #169 for the actual numbers.
 
Re: WWII Vet, 88, brutally beaten in Spokane, Wash.

Let ME help YOU.
There are more whites in america..will you concede that?
Lets say there are 300 million people in the u.s and 72% of them are white.That's 216 million people...if 12% are at poverty level that equals 26 million. Still with me?

If negroes make up 13% of the population that equals a total of 39 million. 25% of that number at poverty level equals 9 million.

So that excuse is now debunked.

Now even though you've studiously avoided discussing actual crime rates supported by FBI statistics we know for a fact that negroes commit a disproportionately high amount of crime...Look at post #169 for the actual numbers.

Not really, when you are discussing difference in population you have to go by per capita, which means for the same number of white people there are more blacks in poverty by their percentage than white. By over double. Which would account for the almost double crime rate. When you have 2x the poverty rate you are going to get higher crime rate. This isn't something that is up for debate unless you are still going to contest there are fewer blacks in poverty than white (in terms of per population percentage). There are far more blacks in poverty than white per capita.

If that is the case you might want to look up how statistics work when comparing to very different population sizes. IE China and US. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom