Sorry buddy, but I am not that gullible. Cons can try to be ambiguous about it, but we have seen your enthusiasm for the Iraq war, your excuses for Bush on ignoring warnings that might have helped stop 9/11 if he had paid attention, and the reality that 4 dead in an embassy attack is actually a pretty good record for a 2 term president considering the last half century. We know you do not like obama and hold him to a much higher standard than the failures like the Bushs', reagan, and nixon. You make it seem like this is something only he did and the rest of those guys are saints who did much better when really they failed much harder than he has in this area. If you want to do that sort of thing in the future it might be a good idea to have the conservatives stay more silent rather than being shining examples of hypocrisy in situations like this. In other words do not open your mouths and remove all doubt as to your intentions and contradictions. However, when you spend 8 years hailing Bush and praying to reagan's dead spirit it shows where you truly stand. Own it.
The truth has emerged. We know what happened. What you want is not the truth, but rather evidence of the lie that was made up. The problem with having an investigation based on an assumption of wrongdoing is that sometimes the situation and evidence is not what you assumed or wanted it to be. Was what happened due to risky actions? Of course. Was it worse than any other president? No, it actually worked out better than it has for other presidents. Interestingly the mistake of leaving the consolate with little protection also lowered the available people to die which was normally much higher for past presidents who put more people in harms way. Considering budget limitations and spending cutbacks you cannot boost support for these places. Less taxes and less spending that is promoted by the republicans means that the only available option to lower the death toll is to lower the number of people to be killed. It is simple math.
Thank you for catching up. We were selling arms to wacky kadaffi a month before the whole attack started and that was pretty public knowledge, and many news organizations questioned why we would all of a sudden turn on a customer. We also know that we provided assistance for the rebels which included weapons. Maybe you forgot those things, but the strategy seemed to be avoid a full on invasion by helping to arm the rebels and giving them some military strikes in lieu of using the full force of the military to invade. None of this is new, or surprising. The US sells guns and arms all over the world. We know a certain OBL was directly assisted by the US government through money and arms because he fought against russia during their afganistan invasion. There is things like Iran/contra, the gun sales to destabilize south american countries, the supply of arms to isreal and her allies, and tons of other incidents where the US has played arms dealer to many notoriously bad people. This is not Obama's creation. Would it be nice if we stopped screwing around in the world like that? Yes it would. Would it be great if obama decided to stop doing that? i think so but we know you would complain he is endangering america if he stopped playing those games. The reality is you want him to do it, you just don't want it to be him that does it because you hate him. You would criticize him both ways, and that is why people like you are hypocrites.
If obama had parachuted in and single handedly saved the embassy and all it's people you would complain because of some other reason. Please don't tell us that you actually care because we know you do not care about the dead people. All you care about is complaining about obama and you will stand on the backs of those corpses to do so.