• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Diplomats in Benghazi Debacle Back on Job

Tererun was not blaming anything on Bush. Tererun was simply pointing out the hypocracy of the right wing. It is ok if your guy does it, but...
Navy Pride said:
Here is a flash for you my left wing friend...........President Bush was reelected by a bigger margin then Obama........You can't blame Bush anymore.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
Tererun was not blaming anything on Bush. Tererun was simply pointing out the hypocracy of the right wing. It is ok if your guy does it, but...
Click to expand...

There is more than just the 'right wing' and the 'left wing'. Do you think it's only the 'right wing' who want to know the truth abut Benghazi and why their Ambassador was murdered there, along with three other Americans? I believe the 'middle' would like some answers as well, and not try to cover it up. That's holds true of all the scandals within this present administration.
 
There is no evidence of a scandal. None. The only real scandal I see is the RW making up stuff.
Grant said:
There is more than just the 'right wing' and the 'left wing'. Do you think it's only the 'right wing' who want to know the truth abut Benghazi and why their Ambassador was murdered there, along with three other Americans? I believe the 'middle' would like some answers as well, and not try to cover it up. That's holds true of all the scandals within this present administration.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
There is no evidence of a scandal. None. The only real scandal I see is the RW making up stuff.
Click to expand...

This one should be on Saturday Night Live. LOL.
 
Yes, exactly what I expected. Now tell me I just refuse to see all that evidnece you just posted.
ItAin'tFree said:
A two hour special Saturday Night Live is in order. LOL.
Click to expand...
 
MMC said:
Heya Mak. :2wave: Well to be honest.....it was trick taken out of the Democratic Playbook. Like Obama did, used Benghazi for Political Gain and in Election to top it off. You don't think for a second that Clinton wouldn't hesitate to use something politically damaging to gain power. No not at all Right? :roll:
sarcasm2.gif


Yes there was quite a bit of wrongdoing in Benghazi.....the First thing that was wrong. Was not listening to the Libyans. Who repeatedly told us that Benghazi was to dangerous to conduct any business in at the time. We were given this warning 3 days before 911 and two days before al Zawahiri released his tape stating to avenge al-Libi. Both State Dept and the CIA ignored those warnings.

Also State Dept refused to acknowledge the clear and present warning signs as to what had happened inside Libya with other Foreign Diplomats.

Then there was the issue of the State Dept hiring those who attacked us. Let alone a host of procedures and protocols that were not followed. As well as the incompetency and then the playing for political gain by those all working Under Clinton Directly.
Click to expand...

Incompetency says it all in one word.
 
Exaclty why no one except far RWers take this stuff seriously.
 
mak2 said:
Exaclty why no one except far RWers take this stuff seriously.
Click to expand...

Oh Right......that's Right,.....only left wingers bloviate that they can determine what is serious and not serious. :roll:

Tell ya what Mak.....try looking at the Top of the War College. One thing is for certain. You wont see a left-winger in the top ten. Speaks volumes in the true reality of things. Just sayin.

Which you been there, in the ****.....so you know exactly how limited the left truly is. Which that just cant be gotten around. To much past History and On the Spot moments that prove that worth. Almost 9 out of ten times. Do you think the minority that resides in that group can make up for all its other ****-ups?
 
MMC said:
Heya Apache. :2wave: When it comes to Democrats.....that is, repeated incompetency.
Click to expand...

If I were to be back in college and my political science term paper was on the Obama administration I could have turned in one page of paper with one word typed on it, that word being 'incompetency" and I would have received an A+ grade.
 
I am not really a lefty. But the dumb stuff like this pushes me further and furter away from the right. Pointing out there is no evidence there was any wrong doing from the Obama administration does not make me a lefty. But insisting something happens with no evidnence makes you delusional...at best. Just read you guys last 4-5 posts. Nothing but name calling and accusations. How bout something concrete, some sort of evidence. Remember when the elections were going on Faux was going crazy, there were military assets everywhere and Obama would not use them A jet here a company of Marines there and on and on. He just went to his room and hid. When it gets right down to it there were what? 6 guys somewhere that would have just died too? This doesnt make me a lefty. But id does kinda embarss me I used to be such a consverative.
 
mak2 said:
I am not really a lefty. But the dumb stuff like this pushes me further and furter away from the right. Pointing out there is no evidence there was any wrong doing from the Obama administration does not make me a lefty. But insisting something happens with no evidnence makes you delusional...at best. Just read you guys last 4-5 posts. Nothing but name calling and accusations. How bout something concrete, some sort of evidence. Remember when the elections were going on Faux was going crazy, there were military assets everywhere and Obama would not use them A jet here a company of Marines there and on and on. He just went to his room and hid. When it gets right down to it there were what? 6 guys somewhere that would have just died too? This doesnt make me a lefty. But id does kinda embarss me I used to be such a consverative.
Click to expand...

How many times do I have to put up to show the Libyans warned us 3 days ahead of time. The left can't get around it.....no matter how much they lie, cheat, steal, beg, or borrow. Nor even deny.

How many times does a facility need to be attacked.....before the Democrats will actually consider what took place as attacks. Look its real simple. The First time the Benghazi Facility was hit.....the left downplayed it. Then it got hit again, plus a US Ambassador was killed. All due to some shenanigans and sheer incompetency. The sheer inability to even recognize the dangers.

That's all that is needed to validate. That none of those people from the left that made decisions about anything.....should have EVER been put there in the First place. Which includes Hillary Clinton as SOS.
 
I really dont know if it is protocol for American diplomats to bail everytime a country issues some sort of warning. I suspect if it was there would be a lot of bailing. It is not lying cheating or whatever else you are going on about. Show me something that says all the presidents before have always bugged out every time the host country has issued a warning. I doubt it was ever downplayed by anyone. Without doubt Faux lied aout it at first and has doubled down on it ever since. Sheer incompeteny? Ok, has anything like this every happened before? (Yes), was that incopetence too? Is being a diplomat a dangerous buisness? how much risk is appropriate? The right doesnt come up with anything concrete, just stuff like this. I have no doubt you beleive all this, but it is baseless. The right never address anything of substance, just goes on about incompetence and shanannagians with no real context. Again, nothing you say below is evident wrong doing.
MMC said:
How many times do I have to put up to show the Libyans warned us 3 days ahead of time. The left can't get around it.....no matter how much they lie, cheat, steal, beg, or borrow. Nor even deny.

How many times does a facility need to be attacked.....before the Democrats will actually consider what took place as attacks. Look its real simple. The First time the Benghazi Facility was hit.....the left downplayed it. Then it got hit again, plus a US Ambassador was killed. All due to some shenanigans and sheer incompetency. The sheer inability to even recognize the dangers.

That's all that is needed to validate. That none of those people from the left that made decisions about anything.....should have EVER been put there in the First place. Which includes Hillary Clinton as SOS.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
I really dont know if it is protocol for American diplomats to bail everytime a country issues some sort of warning. I suspect if it was there would be a lot of bailing. It is not lying cheating or whatever else you are going on about. Show me something that says all the presidents before have always bugged out every time the host country has issued a warning. I doubt it was ever downplayed by anyone. Without doubt Faux lied aout it at first and has doubled down on it ever since. Sheer incompeteny? Ok, has anything like this every happened before? (Yes), was that incopetence too? Is being a diplomat a dangerous buisness? how much risk is appropriate? The right doesnt come up with anything concrete, just stuff like this. I have no doubt you beleive all this, but it is baseless. The right never address anything of substance, just goes on about incompetence and shanannagians with no real context. Again, nothing you say below is evident wrong doing.
Click to expand...

You don't think they should bail everytime a country issues a warning? :roll: Now who said everytime? How about the Most significant times. Mak.....listen to what you are saying. There was no mistaking all those other countries that closed their Embassies and pulled up out of dodge. There was no mistaking the Attempt on the UK Ambassadors life. Nor the Italians.

There was no mistaking the first attack on the facility. There was no mistaking the Attack on the Red Cross either.

Let me ask you.....how do you go and hire some Terrorists to act as Security for the US? That would be Ansar Al Shariah.....Mak. Just a simple mistake.....huh?

How about simple mistakes made by those who shouldn't have ever been there in the first place.....then their cover up of those mistakes......then their deflection with anything else that can get the focus off of here.

Why......because of those shenanigans we spoke of before.
 
mak2 said:
I really dont know if it is protocol for American diplomats to bail everytime a country issues some sort of warning. I suspect if it was there would be a lot of bailing. It is not lying cheating or whatever else you are going on about. Show me something that says all the presidents before have always bugged out every time the host country has issued a warning. I doubt it was ever downplayed by anyone. Without doubt Faux lied aout it at first and has doubled down on it ever since. Sheer incompeteny? Ok, has anything like this every happened before? (Yes), was that incopetence too? Is being a diplomat a dangerous buisness? how much risk is appropriate? The right doesnt come up with anything concrete, just stuff like this. I have no doubt you beleive all this, but it is baseless. The right never address anything of substance, just goes on about incompetence and shanannagians with no real context. Again, nothing you say below is evident wrong doing.
Click to expand...

Do you think there was any lying going on when Obama and Clinton said a Youtube video was the cause of the attacks? Did you read Ambassador Stevens' diary?
 
No. I really believe anytime something like that starts there is so much chaos going on they probably truly did not know what was going on at first. I also believe some secrecy is necessary. I remember something about CNN finding it and turning it over to the family. Why dont you tell be about the earth shattering evidence of a coverup I have not yet head about contained therein?
Grant said:
Do you think there was any lying going on when Obama and Clinton said a Youtube video was the cause of the attacks? Did you read Ambassador Stevens' diary?
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
No. I really believe anytime something like that starts there is so much chaos going on they probably truly did not know what was going on at first. I also believe some secrecy is necessary. I remember something about CNN finding it and turning it over to the family. Why dont you tell be about the earth shattering evidence of a coverup I have not yet head about contained therein?
Click to expand...

Do you think downplaying the first attack on the facility.....could play into that? You don't think Stevens was aware of what went down with Kenya and Tanzania when the Dems were in Office last time?
 
mak2 said:
Yes, exactly what I expected. Now tell me I just refuse to see all that evidnece you just posted.
Click to expand...

Perhaps a mini-series is in order. LOL. This comedy in endless.
 
mak2 said:
No. I really believe anytime something like that starts there is so much chaos going on they probably truly did not know what was going on at first. I also believe some secrecy is necessary. I remember something about CNN finding it and turning it over to the family. Why dont you tell be about the earth shattering evidence of a coverup I have not yet head about contained therein?
Click to expand...

So they said it was a Youtube video because, in all the chaos, they didn't know what was going on? And you find this acceptable?

Why was CNN there before the American government?
 
Not a scandal.
Grant said:
So they said it was a Youtube video because, in all the chaos, they didn't know what was going on? And you find this acceptable?

Why was CNN there before the American government?
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
Not a scandal.
Click to expand...

But it is sheer incompetency.....All the more reason to Run those Democrats out any positions they hold.

Never settle for second best or the bench players. ;)
 
So tell me, what happened to all the crazy stuff Fox was talking about during the election? all the troops and the armed drone and the AC 130? I think there was a durn good chance the RWers just made this up to help Romney get elected. Now Faux keeps it alive the keep the base emotional and stirred up. The only lying I see is coming from the right/ Oh, I looked up his diary, on Sep 11th the first entry was words to the effect he was glad to be back in Benghazi.
MMC said:
But it is sheer incompetency.....All the more reason to Run those Democrats out any positions they hold.

Never settle for second best or the bench players. ;)
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom