• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tea Party Favorite Cruz releases birth certificate

You were certainly not the first to make me aware that righties lie about Obama's education. Just so ya know.

I wasn't referring to Obamas education. Or lack of. Just the fact that he is in every bit in as deep, if not deeper, than all "birthers". He started it all. So if any "birther" is a "nut case", "crazy" ,"liar" or whatever, then a person with any honesty at all would have to include Obama in the same breath. But leftists will be leftists so I never expect them to be honest about anything.
 
I wasn't referring to Obamas education. Or lack of. Just the fact that he is in every bit in as deep, if not deeper, than all "birthers". He started it all. So if any "birther" is a "nut case", "crazy" ,"liar" or whatever, then a person with any honesty at all would have to include Obama in the same breath. But leftists will be leftists so I never expect them to be honest about anything.
He did not start it all. Complete nonsense.
 
I wasn't referring to Obamas education. Or lack of. Just the fact that he is in every bit in as deep, if not deeper, than all "birthers". He started it all. So if any "birther" is a "nut case", "crazy" ,"liar" or whatever, then a person with any honesty at all would have to include Obama in the same breath. But leftists will be leftists so I never expect them to be honest about anything.

I'm feeling a bit slow this morning after working thru most of the night - could you explain in no more than two syllable words, just how President Obama is a "nut case", "crazy" ,"liar" like those who cling to the birther beliefs?
 
Is that a "right-winger"?

Also, I notice you had to go to the conspiracy theory forum to find someone.. I don't think that technically counts as here. :2razz:
Who cares what you count? "Here" is this forum. There are plenty.
 
He did not start it all. Complete nonsense.

Sure he did. At least in 1991, if not sooner.

Now, he probably wishes he had nothing to do with it, but it doesn't change facts.
 
I wasn't referring to Obamas education. Or lack of. Just the fact that he is in every bit in as deep, if not deeper, than all "birthers". He started it all. So if any "birther" is a "nut case", "crazy" ,"liar" or whatever, then a person with any honesty at all would have to include Obama in the same breath. But leftists will be leftists so I never expect them to be honest about anything.

Leftists are dupes, and there are no two ways about it. Even Noam Chomsky, one of the most leftist of leftists, is able to see this clearly.Noam Chomsky: Sarah Palin Was Right About ‘Hope And Change’ [Video]
 
Sure he did. At least in 1991, if not sooner.

Now, he probably wishes he had nothing to do with it, but it doesn't change facts.
LOL! As if you know any facts.

If you did, you would know that the publisher of that pamphlet says that they didn't get Obama's bio from Obama. So you claiming Obama started "birtherism" is yet more BS.

If you knew facts, you would know that the NY times reported in 1990 that Obama was born in Hawaii.

So no, Obama is not a Birther, nor did he start it.

And again, this is not a defense of Obama but a highlight of the loony lies being spread.
 
I'm feeling a bit slow this morning after working thru most of the night - could you explain in no more than two syllable words, just how President Obama is a "nut case", "crazy" ,"liar" like those who cling to the birther beliefs?

Why not ask Obama why he no longer "clings" to the "birther" beliefs? He started every bit of it. While you are at it, ask him why he did start it all. I can see why he might have done what he did, but I don't know 100% for sure why he did what he did. Good luck though, I'm betting you won't get a peep.
 
When do the lies end?? No friends remember him? Really?

Obama's Neighborhood - Barack Obama Resources, Hawaii History, Punahou, Pictures, Images

NO PROFESSORS can remember him? Really?

Obama's missing 'thesis' - First Read

Seriously ... what do you think you gain by lying?

There is no doubt BHO attended Harvard but there is also no doubt that he was an affirmative action student, just as he is an affirmative action President.

It doesn't really matter how much time he spends on the golf course, on vacations, with celebrities, or with his dogs. This is a teleprompter president and the real power lies with his 'czars'.
 
LOL! As if you know any facts.

If you did, you would know that the publisher of that pamphlet says that they didn't get Obama's bio from Obama. So you claiming Obama started "birtherism" is yet more BS.

If you knew facts, you would know that the NY times reported in 1990 that Obama was born in Hawaii.

So no, Obama is not a Birther, nor did he start it.

And again, this is not a defense of Obama but a highlight of the loony lies being spread.

If they didn't get the information from Obama, who did they get it from? Obama's literary agent says he was 'born in Kenya'. How did the mainstream media miss this? – Telegraph Blogs
 

Dunno where they got it from as they didn't say. What they did say was that Obama was not the source. So ascribing that to Obama is nothing short of ridiculous. And again, a year earlier, the NY Times reported that Obama was born in Hawaii.

According to the conspiracy nuts, he must have been telling some people he was born in Hawaii and then changing that to Kenya and then back to Hawaii again.
:screwy
 
Dunno where they got it from as they didn't say. What they did say was that Obama was not the source. So ascribing that to Obama is nothing short of ridiculous. And again, a year earlier, the NY Times reported that Obama was born in Hawaii.

According to the conspiracy nuts, he must have been telling some people he was born in Hawaii and then changing that to Kenya and then back to Hawaii again.
:screwy

It seems you never read the article. read it first, please, and then comment.
 
Let's see your evidence that healthcare in Massachusetts is on par with witchdoctor healthcare.......

Why should I waste my time looking for evidence for you for something I did not bring up nor support? :lamo

If you want evidence, look it up yourself. I don't care about Romney's health care plan, and I especially don't care about Obama's ignorant plan.

One thing though, Romeny's plan was on the state level where the buffoon Obama's is on the federal level. See if you can figure out the difference,
 
LOL! As if you know any facts.

If you did, you would know that the publisher of that pamphlet says that they didn't get Obama's bio from Obama. So you claiming Obama started "birtherism" is yet more BS.

If you knew facts, you would know that the NY times reported in 1990 that Obama was born in Hawaii.

So no, Obama is not a Birther, nor did he start it.

And again, this is not a defense of Obama but a highlight of the loony lies being spread.

See here you go with the leftist type stuff. It says nowhere that they "didn't get Obama's bio from Obama". You made that up. "looney lies" from the left trying to protect the first "birther". The article says clients were contacted and they got approval for what was published. How much Obama told them, he will never own up to. But he knowingly allowed it to be published as written for his own reasons. He never demanded they change anything or we would have heard about it from either him or that agency by now. Now he may have started the "birther' stuff before this. But he signed a Presidential order his first day or two in office that may prevent the truth from ever coming out on that.

NY times said he was born in Hawaii in 1990? Well, good for them. In one article the Honolulu Advertiser said Obama was born in Kenya. Whats your point?

So, the facts are once again laid out. At least some of them. Obama won't let the rest out. Obama is the first "birther". The only question about it is, when did he actually start this movement? 1991 or before?
 
Who cares what you count? "Here" is this forum. There are plenty.

You keep claiming that but I don't see a lot of people here who fit your claim. I mean, even in this case you pick a poster who didn't disclosed their politics, and who hasn't been around here long enough that there are no posts for me to browse.
 
LOL....see post #314


Well, first, is that poster "right wing"? Not likely as they are libertarian.

Second, they clearly state that they believe Obama is a natural born citizen and eligible to be president, so they aren't a birther either.
 
Why not ask Obama why he no longer "clings" to the "birther" beliefs? He started every bit of it. While you are at it, ask him why he did start it all. I can see why he might have done what he did, but I don't know 100% for sure why he did what he did. Good luck though, I'm betting you won't get a peep.

or in other words "I KNOW WHAT I KNOW AND REALITY BE DAMNED! and why should I explain something that is so obvious to 'right'-thinking people, particularly when the question is asked by some un-American socialist Obama worshipper." [/sarcasm]

:roll:
 
Last edited:
There is this thing called "Google" that you should probably check before posting such things. After all, there are more people like you out there who don't bother looking it up and happily post is as possibly true when trying to make a point.

It appears that the subtlety of the post escaped you. And, by the way, I knew about Google .. that's where I find all of the stuff on Obama being a Kenyan, a Muslim, not being born here, not understanding America (since he's a foreigner), etc. It's the same place, no? Anyway, please stand by ... I may want you to do other work for me in the future ...
 
or in other words "I KNOW WHAT I KNOW AND REALITY BE DAMNED! and why should I explain something that is so obvious to 'right'-thinking people, particularly when the question is asked by some un-American socialist Obama worshipper." [/sarcasm]

:roll:

Why not just ask Obama?
 
It appears that the subtlety of the post escaped you. And, by the way, I knew about Google .. that's where I find all of the stuff on Obama being a Kenyan, a Muslim, not being born here, not understanding America (since he's a foreigner), etc. It's the same place, no? Anyway, please stand by ... I may want you to do other work for me in the future ...

Don't worry, I double check what you say by default as you aren't blessed with an abundance of trustworthiness.

By the way, where did you locate a copy of that quote that didn't make it clear that the quote was fake?
 
It's funny how birthers refuse to address Cruz's situation but love to pontificate about Obama's situation.

We know for a FACT that Cruz was not born in the USA.

Yes or No... is it a problem for Senator Cruz to not be born in America to be President?
 
Don't worry, I double check what you say by default as you aren't blessed with an abundance of trustworthiness.

By the way, where did you locate a copy of that quote that didn't make it clear that the quote was fake?

that's only right since I find myself doing the same with you, but don't start feeling special ... I do it with all of you conservatives ... at times it feels like a full-time job ...

as far as the quote is concerned, you can do the work, and if you do it right, you'll find more than one link where it's not obvious ... but that's irrelevant anyway, since my post was more subtle than that (and I even indicated that there was a question about its authenticity) ... what should disturb you is that it is believable and that was the point I was making, actually warning Dems that it is not out of the realm of possibility that we may end up with a Rand Paul or Ted Cruz as president ...

J, you're going to have to keep up because I'm not going to be there every time to help you ... take care ...
 
I dont think it makes a whole lot of difference. What amazes me is the breath taking hyporisy from the right wingers. But hey, it hasnt be the party of morals and ethics for years. Glad they quit saying that...
It's funny how birthers refuse to address Cruz's situation but love to pontificate about Obama's situation.

We know for a FACT that Cruz was not born in the USA.

Yes or No... is it a problem for Senator Cruz to not be born in America to be President?
 
that's only right since I find myself doing the same with you, but don't start feeling special ... I do it with all of you conservatives ... at times it feels like a full-time job ...

as far as the quote is concerned, you can do the work, and if you do it right, you'll find more than one link where it's not obvious ... but that's irrelevant anyway, since my post was more subtle than that (and I even indicated that there was a question about its authenticity) ... what should disturb you is that it is believable and that was the point I was making, actually warning Dems that it is not out of the realm of possibility that we may end up with a Rand Paul or Ted Cruz as president ...

J, you're going to have to keep up because I'm not going to be there every time to help you ... take care ...


There is no reason to track your source of the quote. Whether you were misinformed by the source, misread the source or simply chose to withhold the fact that it was fake doesn't really matter. They all make you look bad.

The "subtlety" in you post was posting a fake Reagan quote about George Bush as a warning to Dems? So "subtlety" to you is defined as "pointless unverified gossip"? You should have skipped the quote.
 
Back
Top Bottom